Business
EU fines Apple and Meta €700m, risking Trump fury
Apple Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. were hit by relatively modest European Union fines totaling €700 million ($798 million) for violating tough new antitrust rules for Big Tech, following warnings of harsh retaliation from US President Donald Trump.
EU regulators levied the penalties — €500 million against Apple and €200 million against Meta — under its Digital Markets Act, which includes a list of dos and don’ts mainly aimed at Silicon Valley giants.
“Apple and Meta have fallen short,” EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said on Wednesday.
“All companies operating in the EU must follow our laws and respect European values.”
The punishments — the first under the DMA — are far lower than previous penalties under traditional EU competition law, and are likely to be seen as an attempt to avoid further provoking Trump, who recently laid out a swath of tariffs on global economies.
He’s specifically called out the EU’s tech regulations as the kind of non-tariff trade barrier that his so-called reciprocal tariffs are intended to target.
The European Commission said that Apple had failed to allow developers to link out from its App Store in order to make sales outside of the company’s marketplace.
Meta’s business model for ad-free services on Instagram and Facebook also fell foul of the tech law, which gives regulators fining powers of up to 10% of a company’s global annual revenue.
Both firms must comply with the EU decision within 60 days, or face the risk of further financial penalties.
Apple was also warned that its new fee structure for app developers — itself a plan devised to comply with EU rules — isn’t in line with the EU Big Tech rulebook.
Apple responded fiercely to the EU penalty, accusing the bloc’s regulators of discriminating against the company and forcing it to give away its technology for free.
The Cupertino, California-based company said it would appeal the fine to the EU courts. Just last year, the company was hit with a €1.8 billion EU fine for shutting out music-streaming rivals on the iPhone.
Meta’s head of global affairs Joel Kaplan also hit back, saying the EU “is attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.”
The EU decision “isn’t just about a fine; the commission forcing us to change our business model effectively imposes a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service,” said Kaplan.
“And by unfairly restricting personalized advertising the European Commission is also hurting European businesses and economies.
”The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.Asked about whether the commission had deliberately kept the fines low to avoid provoking Trump, the Brussels-based EU commission said the fines were “proportionate” to the alleged gravity and duration of breaches of the DMA, which became applicable two years ago.
“This is about enforcement. It’s not about trade negotiations,” commission spokesperson Arianna Podesta told reporters.
Still, the size of the fines “suggest an easing of European regulatory pressure on US tech giants,” according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Tamlin Bason.
“Penalties under the competition law could have been as much as 10% of total revenue, but ended up being less than 0.15% of each company’s 2024 sales, likely reflecting caution on aggressive enforcement against a tense backdrop in US-EU relations,” Bason said.
Despite its fine, Apple did see EU watchdogs close an investigation into online browsers after it rejigged how it offers users more choice on their iPhones.
EU regulators also backtracked on their decision to target Facebook Marketplace under the DMA. Meta was hit by a €798 million EU fine for alleged abuses on that service last year under standard antitrust law.
Apple shares rose 3.5% and Meta advanced 7% in early New York trading while the S&P 500 Index was up 3%.
Over recent years the EU has made costly penalties against firms, including more than $8 billion in fines against Alphabet Inc.’s Google and a separate order for Apple to pay Ireland back taxes of €13 billion.
Under its abuse-of-dominance rules, it has also forced changes out of Amazon.com Inc.’s marketplace platform and Apple’s tap-and-go chip, while also investigating Microsoft Corp. video conference software, Teams.
Business
Justrite Supermarket Sets For IFC’s $15m Loan For Expansion
Justrite, a popular supermarket chain co-founded by the dynamic duo, Ayodele Patrick Aderinwale and his wife, is on the cusp of a significant expansion.
The International Finance Corporation (IFC) is considering a substantial $15 million loan to help Justrite open a whopping 25 new stores across the country.
This exciting development promises a brighter future for both Justrite and the local economy.
The financing would be used to build and equip the new stores, creating jobs for Nigerians.
The expansion also aims to strengthen Justrite’s relationships with local suppliers, boosting their businesses as well.
If the deal goes through, it would be one of the largest development-finance investments in Nigeria’s retail sector in recent times, signaling confidence in the country’s growing market.
Since starting as a small neighborhood store in 2000, Justrite has grown into a familiar homegrown retail brand, serving urban and peri-urban communities that lack modern supermarkets.
The new funding could accelerate its expansion beyond the southwest, enhance logistics, cold-chain systems, and digital inventory tools, and further position Justrite as a scalable national retailer.
AfricInvest, which took a 40.4 percent stake in 2022, has already supported operational and procurement upgrades, preparing the chain for this next growth phase. The proposed IFC loan reflects renewed investor confidence in Nigeria’s consumer market after recent inflation and currency pressures.
Business
Nigerian govt suspends implementation of 15% petrol import duty
The Nigerian government has suspended the planned 15 per cent import duty on premium motor spirit (PMS) and automotive gas oil (diesel). The announcement was made by George Ene-Ita, spokesperson for the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), in a statement on Thursday.
The regulator urged Nigerians to avoid panic buying, assuring that there is adequate supply of petroleum products nationwide.
“It should also be noted that the implementation of the 15 percent ad valorem import duty on imported premium motor spirit and diesel is no longer in view,” NMDPRA stated.
The statement added that both domestic and imported supplies of petrol, diesel, and other petroleum products are sufficient to meet demand, especially during the peak period. The authority warned against hoarding, panic buying, or unwarranted price increases, and affirmed that it would continue to monitor supply and distribution closely.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had approved the 15 per cent import duty last month to encourage the use of products from Dangote Refinery. While some stakeholders supported the move as a boost for local refining, critics argued it could increase fuel prices and worsen economic hardship for Nigerians.
Business
NAFDAC’s Ban on sachets alcohol: the economy repercussions, by MAN
The Association emphasised that the ban would likely lead to the “Loss of over N1.9 trillion in investments, primarily from indigenous Nigerian companies.
The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) has said that the government’s move to ban the production and sale of alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets and small PET bottles, effective December 31, 2025, will have severe repercussions on the economy.
” This announcement by the NAFDAC, in our view, is counterproductive and threatens to disrupt the economy significantly at a time when it is beginning to stabilise,” said the Association through its Director-General, Ajayi-Kadir.
The Association emphasised that the ban would likely lead to the “Loss of over N1.9 trillion in investments, primarily from indigenous Nigerian companies.
• Mass retrenchment of over 500,000 direct employees and approximately 5 million indirect employees through contracts, marketing, and logistics.”
Ajayi-Kadir said that the earlier directive from the Ministry of Health for a one-year extension, which included the consideration and validation of the draft National Alcohol Policy by stakeholders, should have been taken into account before any significant announcement from another government body.
“We believe that a consultation with whether through a public hearing or focused meetings with relevant parties in the alcohol beverage industry, should have been conducted by the appropriate Senate Committee before an outright ban was imposed.
This approach was successfully followed by the House of Representatives in the recent past,” he stated.
Ajayi-Kadir highlighted that issues related to the ban on alcohol in sachets and small PET bottles were addressed by a broad committee that included all stakeholders, along with NAFDAC representatives, who validated the National Alcohol Policy in October 2025. The committee made the following key recommendations:
• Develop multi-sectoral action plans.- Strengthen enforcement by law enforcement agencies
• Establish licensed liquor stores/outlets in Local Government Areas nationwide.
• Increase monitoring and compliance checks by NAFDAC, FCCPC, and others to ensure product quality and safety.
• Regulatory bodies should focus more on regulation, monitoring, and educational campaigns to inform stakeholders and the public about the dangers of underage alcohol consumption and its sale in motor parks.
• Conduct educational campaigns in secondary schools across the country to raise awareness among students about the dangers and issues related to alcohol abuse.
Furthermore, we would like to note that the unfounded and untested claim of abuse by minors has been challenged by several independent studies conducted by the government.
The industry has proactively launched campaigns promoting responsible alcohol consumption to discourage underage abuse, resulting in expenditures exceeding one billion Naira on media outreach across the nation, which has effectively just underage drinking.
Ajayi-Kadir also stressed that the Senate’s directive for an outright ban is unjust and does not reflect the industry’s true conditions, as it seems the upper chamber has only considered NAFDAC’s perspective.
NAFDAC was part of the validation organised by the Ministry of Health, and it should have presented its views to the Committee and the Ministry during that process, rather than circumventing these channels and approaching the National Assembly without consulting other stakeholders.
-
Sports3 days agoCAF announces free e-visas for fans attending AFCON Morocco 2025
-
News3 days agoParliamentary Workers set for full-scale nationwide strike
-
Politics3 days agoPDP Ibadan Convention : Amotekun, DSS and Police Beefup Securiy
-
Crime3 days agoBREAKING: DSS Recaptures Ansaru Terrorist Commander Linked to Church Massacre
-
News2 days agoFG vows to end frequent power grid collapses
-
Crime2 days agoArmy confirms death of two soldiers in Borno ambush
-
News2 days agoMarwa Vows Tougher Crackdown on Drug Traffickers in Second NDLEA Tenure
-
News3 days agoMarwa To Serve As NDLEA Chairman Until 2031- Tinubu
