Business
EU fines Apple and Meta €700m, risking Trump fury
Apple Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. were hit by relatively modest European Union fines totaling €700 million ($798 million) for violating tough new antitrust rules for Big Tech, following warnings of harsh retaliation from US President Donald Trump.
EU regulators levied the penalties — €500 million against Apple and €200 million against Meta — under its Digital Markets Act, which includes a list of dos and don’ts mainly aimed at Silicon Valley giants.
“Apple and Meta have fallen short,” EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said on Wednesday.
“All companies operating in the EU must follow our laws and respect European values.”
The punishments — the first under the DMA — are far lower than previous penalties under traditional EU competition law, and are likely to be seen as an attempt to avoid further provoking Trump, who recently laid out a swath of tariffs on global economies.
He’s specifically called out the EU’s tech regulations as the kind of non-tariff trade barrier that his so-called reciprocal tariffs are intended to target.
The European Commission said that Apple had failed to allow developers to link out from its App Store in order to make sales outside of the company’s marketplace.
Meta’s business model for ad-free services on Instagram and Facebook also fell foul of the tech law, which gives regulators fining powers of up to 10% of a company’s global annual revenue.
Both firms must comply with the EU decision within 60 days, or face the risk of further financial penalties.
Apple was also warned that its new fee structure for app developers — itself a plan devised to comply with EU rules — isn’t in line with the EU Big Tech rulebook.
Apple responded fiercely to the EU penalty, accusing the bloc’s regulators of discriminating against the company and forcing it to give away its technology for free.
The Cupertino, California-based company said it would appeal the fine to the EU courts. Just last year, the company was hit with a €1.8 billion EU fine for shutting out music-streaming rivals on the iPhone.
Meta’s head of global affairs Joel Kaplan also hit back, saying the EU “is attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.”
The EU decision “isn’t just about a fine; the commission forcing us to change our business model effectively imposes a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service,” said Kaplan.
“And by unfairly restricting personalized advertising the European Commission is also hurting European businesses and economies.
”The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.Asked about whether the commission had deliberately kept the fines low to avoid provoking Trump, the Brussels-based EU commission said the fines were “proportionate” to the alleged gravity and duration of breaches of the DMA, which became applicable two years ago.
“This is about enforcement. It’s not about trade negotiations,” commission spokesperson Arianna Podesta told reporters.
Still, the size of the fines “suggest an easing of European regulatory pressure on US tech giants,” according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Tamlin Bason.
“Penalties under the competition law could have been as much as 10% of total revenue, but ended up being less than 0.15% of each company’s 2024 sales, likely reflecting caution on aggressive enforcement against a tense backdrop in US-EU relations,” Bason said.
Despite its fine, Apple did see EU watchdogs close an investigation into online browsers after it rejigged how it offers users more choice on their iPhones.
EU regulators also backtracked on their decision to target Facebook Marketplace under the DMA. Meta was hit by a €798 million EU fine for alleged abuses on that service last year under standard antitrust law.
Apple shares rose 3.5% and Meta advanced 7% in early New York trading while the S&P 500 Index was up 3%.
Over recent years the EU has made costly penalties against firms, including more than $8 billion in fines against Alphabet Inc.’s Google and a separate order for Apple to pay Ireland back taxes of €13 billion.
Under its abuse-of-dominance rules, it has also forced changes out of Amazon.com Inc.’s marketplace platform and Apple’s tap-and-go chip, while also investigating Microsoft Corp. video conference software, Teams.
Business
Global energy costs take its toll on Nigerian Manufacturers
The recent surge in global fuel prices, driven by geopolitical tensions, is compounding the challenge. While some manufacturers have temporarily absorbed the increases, Onafowakan warned that the full impact could materialise within the next three to four months.
The Managing Director/CEO of Coleman Technical Industries Ltd, Mr George Onafowakan, said that the global higher energy costs occasioned by Iran -US Israeli war has started impacting on manufacturers in Nigeria.
Onafowokan said that findings across major industrial zones reveal a sector heavily dependent on diesel-powered generators, with factories running at high energy costs to sustain operations. Engineers and technical teams now work around the clock to monitor fuel consumption and prevent disruptions that could halt production lines.
Onafowakan stressed that power outages routinely stall factory operations, placing manufacturers under intense pressure to meet delivery timelines.
“When the lights go off, everything stops. We rely on generators, but the costs are rising, and there is constant uncertainty about meeting production targets,” he added.
The recent surge in global fuel prices, driven by geopolitical tensions, is compounding the challenge. While some manufacturers have temporarily absorbed the increases, Onafowakan warned that the full impact could materialise within the next three to four months.
“By the second quarter, businesses may be forced to make difficult decisions around production planning and pricing,” he said.
Beyond individual firms, the impact is already rippling across supply chains. Production delays are affecting dependent businesses and, ultimately, consumers, who are likely to face higher prices for goods.
Despite the growing pressure, Onafowakan said widespread layoffs or major operational restructuring may not occur immediately but cautioned that the situation could deteriorate without timely intervention.
Business
CBN orders banks to reverse failed ATM transactions immediately
The requirement will be implemented gradually over three years, with banks expected to meet 30 percent of the threshold in 2026, 60 percent in 2027 and full compliance by 2028.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has directed banks to immediately reverse failed automated teller machine (ATM) transactions.
The apex bank said that the revised framework is designed to strengthen ATM service reliability, improve fraud monitoring, enhance security and ensure stronger consumer protection across Nigeria’s fast-growing digital payments ecosystem., tightening rules aimed at improving consumer protection and reliability across the country’s payment infrastructure.
Beyond refund timelines, the regulator introduced new requirements for ATM deployment nationwide.
All card issuers are required to deploy at least one ATM for every 7,500 payment cards issued.
The requirement will be implemented gradually over three years, with banks expected to meet 30 percent of the threshold in 2026, 60 percent in 2027 and full compliance by 2028.
Under new Guidelines on the Operations of Automated Teller Machines in Nigeria, the apex bank said failed “on-us” ATM transactions, where a customer uses the ATM of their own bank, must be reversed instantly. Where an instant reversal fails due to technical issues or system glitches, banks are required to complete a manual reversal within 24 hours.
For failed “not-on-us” transactions, where a customer uses another bank’s ATM, the refund timeline must not exceed 48 hours.
The guidelines also state that automated reversals for on-us transactions should occur in less than five minutes, while not-on-us transactions should be resolved in less than 15 minutes where automated systems function properly.
The CBN added that in cases where transaction failures arise from biometric mismatch or device errors, ATM operators must provide an immediate fallback to non-biometric verification where it is considered safe.
Such events must also be logged for diagnostics while the stipulated refund timelines are maintained.
The Central Bank also directed that ATMs must be located within reasonable proximity to one another across both urban and rural areas, while deployment, relocation or decommissioning of machines must receive prior written approval from the regulator.
The guidelines also set operational and service benchmarks for ATM operators.
Business
Nigeria Ranks 14th out of 50 Most Agricultural Land globally
The ranking highlights where the world’s largest agricultural footprints are located, spanning major producers across Asia, Africa, and the Americas.
Nigeria has been ranked the fourteenth country among the top 50 Most Agricultural Land in the world.
Agricultural land spans more than 18 million square miles worldwide, forming the foundation of global food production.
In a data analysed by Visual Capitalist using the most recent FAO data compiled by the World Bank, China has the most agricultural land in the world, with roughly 2.0 million square miles.
The United States (1.6 million), Australia (1.4 million), Brazil (914,000) and Russia (832,826) round out the top five countries worldwide.
Each of these countries specialises in different crops.
For example, the U.S. is the world’s largest producer of corn, while Brazil is the top grower of both soybeans and sugarcane.
Meanwhile, Australia has overcome its mostly arid geography to become a major wheat and cereals grower, rivaling major producers like India (689,000) and Ukraine (160,000).

In the data, Asia and Africa account for a large share of the top 50 countries by agricultural land area.
African countries make up nearly half of the top 50 countries worldwide by square mileage of agricultural land area. They’re led by larger countries like Sudan (435,000), South Africa (372,000), and Nigeria (268,000).
The ranking highlights where the world’s largest agricultural footprints are located, spanning major producers across Asia, Africa, and the Americas.
Each of these countries specializes in different crops.
For example, the U.S. is the world’s largest producer of corn, while Brazil is the top grower of both soybeans and sugarcane.
Meanwhile, Australia has overcome its mostly arid geography to become a major wheat and cereals grower, rivaling major producers like India (689,000) and Ukraine (160,000).
Africa’s Growing Desert ProblemAfrican countries make up nearly half of the top 50 countries worldwide by square mileage of agricultural land area.
They’re led by larger countries like Sudan (435,000), South Africa (372,000), and Nigeria (268,000).
As with peers in Eurasia and the Americas, African agriculture is increasingly facing challenges from climate change.In particular, the growing desertification problem is reducing countries’ agricultural land, especially in the Sahel region, as temperatures rise and soil becomes less fertile for growing crops.
Over-farming and over-grazing are exacerbating regional soil erosion and deepening desertification.
-
Politics2 days ago(UPDATED) Governor Soludo Begins Second -Term (2026-2030)
-
Crime3 days agoPolice Confirm 23 Dead in Maiduguri Explosion
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Tinubu orders political appointees seeking elective offices to resign by March 31
-
News2 days agoInsecurity: PDP says Nigeria’s Safer in 2015 Than Today
-
Sports2 days agoCAF Strips Senegal of AFCON title, crowns Morocco champions
-
Crime3 days agoDSS Arrests Notorious Gunrunner, Intercepts 850 Rounds of Live Ammunition in Cross River
-
Business2 days agoGlobal energy costs take its toll on Nigerian Manufacturers
-
Politics2 days agoSoludo Reels Out Past Achievements , New Promises for Anambra
