Connect with us

News

Yahaya Bello Vs EFCC: Court Adjourns Ruling and Continuation of Trials to June 26 , 27 and July 4 and 5

Published

on

836 Views

You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the hearing of the alleged money laundering case instituted against the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling on the request by the prosecution to “cross-examine” the 3rd witness and for continuation of trial.

Justice Emeka Nwite adjourned the hearing after listening to addresses by the prosecution and defence counsels on the Prosecution’s move to initially cross-examine the witness, a position that was rejected by the Defendant’s Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN.

When the matter was called for continuation of cross-examination, the Defendant’s counsel asked the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, whether he had testified in other courts with respect to the issue of school fees paid by the Bello family to AISA, he said yes.

But the witness, an internal auditor at the American International School, Abuja, said he could not mention the exact courts.

He admitted testifying in a similar charge involving Ali Bello but added that he never said anything adversely against former Governor Yahaya Bello just as he had not said anything negative or adversely against him in the instant charge.

After Daudu SAN concluded the cross-examination of the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, the EFCC’s lawyer, Olukayode Enitan, SAN, moved to also cross-examine the Commission’s witness on Exhibit 19.

He told the court that he was not re-examining the EFCC’s witness, but cross-examining him because the document was admitted in evidence.

“I am not re-examining him, I am cross-examining him because they brought this document,” he said.

The Defendant’s lawyer, however, drew the court’s attention to the fact that the prosecution counsel’s position was unknown to law, in line with the Evidence Act.

“If you want to cross-examine your own witness, you have to first declare him a hostile witness. You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

At this point, the judge asked: “Do you have any provision of the law to support this?””I will draw your lordship attention to Section 36 of the Constitution.

They sought to tender this document, we objected and the court granted their prayer. Fair hearing demands that the complainant too has the right to examine this because Section 36 of the Constitution talks of fair hearing,”

Enitan responded. “We are not saying that they cannot re-examine the witness. That is what Section 36 under the law says about fair hearing. But if it is to cross-examine him, he will have to show us the law that backs that.

“He cannot come under the guise of fair hearing to want to cross-examine the witness,” the Defendant’s lawyer maintained. The judge, at the end of the arguments, refused to allow cross-examination of the witness by the EFCC lawyer.”

Under the procedure, the witness gives evidence in chief and the defendant cross examines, then the prosecution re-examines.

“With due respect, what I will do is if you people are so skewed to continue with this, it is better to address me on this and I will take a position,” he stated.

At this point, the prosecution counsel agreed to re-examine the EFCC’s witness and the judge gave him the go-ahead.”You can re-examine him on that but not to ask questions that will show cross examination,” Justice Nwite said.

However, when the prosecution lawyer proceeded to re-examine the witness, and his questions pointed at cross-examination, as observed by Daudu SAN, the judge insisted that the parties had to address him on the specific issue.

The Defendant’s Counsel, in his address, maintained that the position was unknown to law.

“My lord, the procedure that is being sought by the prosecution by refering the witness to the document tender in Exhibit 19 and by asking him to read paragraph 1, without drawing his attention to the issue on how the document affected his evidence in chief, the question asked in cross-examination, and the ambiguity, which needs clarification, amounts to a strange and unknown procedure not covered by the Evidence Act,” he stated.

Enitan SAN, disagreed, saying that in the case of Amobi Amobi referred to by the defendant’s counsel, the Supreme Court held that the learned trial judge ought to have allowed a re-examination of Exhibit E.

He said when the defendant sought to introduce the document, the prosecution team “submitted that this document was not made by the witness and as such, he should not be allowed to speak to it under cross examination or allowed to be confronted with it.”

“Having brought it in now, during the case of the prosecution, particularly during the cross examination of PW-3, your lordship should not allow them to shut us out as that would amount to the court allowing them to blow hot and cold,” Pinheiro SAN said.

Justice Nwite thereafter adjourned to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling and continuation of trial.

The 3rd prosecution witness had, at the last hearing on Thursday, said there was no wired transfer of fees from the Kogi State Government or any of the local Governments in the state to the account of the American International School, Abuja.

He also read out a part of a previous Federal Capital Territory High Court judgment that said there was no court order for AISA to return fees to EFCC or any judgment declaring the money as proceeds of money laundering.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Anambra Achieves ‘100% Healthy’ Rating in Open Government Partnership Subnational Ranking

Published

on

15 Views

By Christian ABURIME

In a strong validation of institutional transparency and accountability, Anambra State has attained the highest possible “100% Healthy” rating in the latest Open Government Partnership (OGP) Nigeria Subnational Status Ranking released in July 2026.

The ranking evaluates participating states across a rigorous nine-point framework that measures genuine openness, accountability, and citizen engagement in governance. Anambra’s perfect score reflects full compliance and strong performance across all assessed criteria, based on verifiable actions rather than declarations.

Under the leadership of Governor Chukwuma Charles Soludo, CFR, the state has embedded a culture of structured governance that prioritises systems, predictability, and measurable results. The OGP assessment highlights Anambra’s political will, resource commitment, and consistent implementation of open government reforms.

“This rating is not an isolated achievement but the natural outcome of a deliberate approach to public administration,” sources familiar with the state’s reforms noted. Governor Soludo’s background as an economist and institution-builder has shaped policies that favour enduring structures over short-term visibility.

The state’s performance aligns with broader gains in service delivery, including notable improvements in primary healthcare that have earned recognition from international partners such as the World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF, and Médecins Sans Frontières.

A “100% Healthy” status signals to investors, development partners, and citizens that Anambra’s regulatory, fiscal, and accountability mechanisms are robust and operational. It positions the state as one of the few in Nigeria with independently verified governance architecture that emphasises transparency as a core operating principle.

The OGP framework operates in continuous cycles of commitment, co-creation, and implementation. Officials say Anambra’s leadership is focused on sustaining and deepening these reforms rather than resting on the current achievement.

In a political landscape often dominated by rhetoric, Anambra’s verified success underscores the compounding value of credibility built on measurable processes. The state continues its upward trajectory, reinforcing its reputation for commercial dynamism and sound governance.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Rejects Motion to Probe N1.3bn PFIPC Allocation Amid Fresh Scandal Allegations

Published

on

27 Views

The Nigerian Senate has rejected a motion seeking a full-scale investigation into the controversial allocation of N1.3 billion to the Petroleum Fuel Import Pricing Committee (PFIPC), a decision that has intensified accusations of a cover-up in what is now being called the PFIPC scandal.

The motion, which was brought before the upper chamber on Wednesday, aimed to compel relevant committees to investigate the disbursement and utilisation of the funds. Proponents argued that the allocation raised serious questions of transparency, accountability, and possible mismanagement of public resources at a time when Nigerians are grappling with high fuel prices and economic hardship.

However, the Senate voted against the motion after a heated debate, with a majority of senators opposing the probe. Critics within and outside the chamber have described the rejection as a blatant attempt to shield powerful interests from scrutiny.

Details of the N1.3 billion allocation first emerged in recent weeks, triggering public outrage. Opposition lawmakers and civil society groups claim the funds were released under questionable circumstances with little documentation on how they were spent or what specific objectives were achieved. Some reports suggest the money was meant for subsidy-related activities or price modulation mechanisms, but lack of clarity has only fuelled suspicions of impropriety.

Reacting to the Senate’s decision, Senator [Name], who sponsored the motion, expressed disappointment: “This is a sad day for transparency in governance. Nigerians deserve to know what happened to this money.”

The development comes as the National Assembly faces growing pressure to demonstrate commitment to fighting corruption. Public commentators and activists have taken to social media to condemn the rejection, with many calling for external intervention by anti-graft agencies such as the EFCC and ICPC.

As of now, the executive arm has remained silent on the matter. The Senate leadership has defended its decision, stating that existing oversight mechanisms are sufficient and that not every allegation warrants a full parliamentary investigation.

The PFIPC scandal continues to generate heated debate, with calls mounting for more openness in the management of petroleum sector funds that directly affect the cost of living for millions of Nigerians.

Continue Reading

News

FG Launches First University Innovation POD, Targets Research-Led Industrial Growth

Published

on

47 Views

The Federal Government has launched Nigeria’s first Manu-Tech University Innovation Pod at the Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, as part of a broader strategy to transform universities into hubs of innovation, manufacturing, entrepreneurship and enterprise development.

The initiative is designed to connect academic research with industry and accelerate economic growth.

Speaking at the launch in Umudike, Abia State, the Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, said universities must move beyond producing graduates and academic publications to becoming centres that create industries, generate jobs and provide practical solutions to national challenges.

He stressed that education must serve as a catalyst for production, innovation and national prosperity, and
explained that the Innovation Pod aligns with the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and is the product of collaboration between the Federal Government, the United Nations Development Programme, Tertiary Education Trust Fund, MOUAU and other stakeholders.

“The facility is expected to bring together researchers, students, innovators, manufacturers and investors within a single innovation ecosystem”. the centre integrates emerging technologies including artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing systems, agro-processing, industrial automation and entrepreneurship”.

“The facility will support the development of ideas from research and design stages through prototyping, production and eventual commercialisation”.

The Minister noted that the location of the Innovation Pod in Abia State is strategic because of its proximity to the renowned Aba manufacturing cluster, creating opportunities to link local enterprise with university research and investment.

He said the initiative would strengthen local manufacturing, promote value addition, create jobs and improve the competitiveness of Made-in-Nigeria products within the African Continental Free Trade Area.

Alausa also disclosed that the Innovation Pod model will be replicated across Nigeria’s geopolitical zones based on regional economic strengths, reaffirming the Federal Government’s commitment to building an education system that equips young Nigerians with future-ready skills, supports research commercialisation and contributes to the nation’s goal of becoming a one-trillion-dollar economy.

Continue Reading

Trending