Connect with us

News

Yahaya Bello Vs EFCC: Court Adjourns Ruling and Continuation of Trials to June 26 , 27 and July 4 and 5

Published

on

849 Views

You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the hearing of the alleged money laundering case instituted against the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling on the request by the prosecution to “cross-examine” the 3rd witness and for continuation of trial.

Justice Emeka Nwite adjourned the hearing after listening to addresses by the prosecution and defence counsels on the Prosecution’s move to initially cross-examine the witness, a position that was rejected by the Defendant’s Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN.

When the matter was called for continuation of cross-examination, the Defendant’s counsel asked the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, whether he had testified in other courts with respect to the issue of school fees paid by the Bello family to AISA, he said yes.

But the witness, an internal auditor at the American International School, Abuja, said he could not mention the exact courts.

He admitted testifying in a similar charge involving Ali Bello but added that he never said anything adversely against former Governor Yahaya Bello just as he had not said anything negative or adversely against him in the instant charge.

After Daudu SAN concluded the cross-examination of the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, the EFCC’s lawyer, Olukayode Enitan, SAN, moved to also cross-examine the Commission’s witness on Exhibit 19.

He told the court that he was not re-examining the EFCC’s witness, but cross-examining him because the document was admitted in evidence.

“I am not re-examining him, I am cross-examining him because they brought this document,” he said.

The Defendant’s lawyer, however, drew the court’s attention to the fact that the prosecution counsel’s position was unknown to law, in line with the Evidence Act.

“If you want to cross-examine your own witness, you have to first declare him a hostile witness. You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

At this point, the judge asked: “Do you have any provision of the law to support this?””I will draw your lordship attention to Section 36 of the Constitution.

They sought to tender this document, we objected and the court granted their prayer. Fair hearing demands that the complainant too has the right to examine this because Section 36 of the Constitution talks of fair hearing,”

Enitan responded. “We are not saying that they cannot re-examine the witness. That is what Section 36 under the law says about fair hearing. But if it is to cross-examine him, he will have to show us the law that backs that.

“He cannot come under the guise of fair hearing to want to cross-examine the witness,” the Defendant’s lawyer maintained. The judge, at the end of the arguments, refused to allow cross-examination of the witness by the EFCC lawyer.”

Under the procedure, the witness gives evidence in chief and the defendant cross examines, then the prosecution re-examines.

“With due respect, what I will do is if you people are so skewed to continue with this, it is better to address me on this and I will take a position,” he stated.

At this point, the prosecution counsel agreed to re-examine the EFCC’s witness and the judge gave him the go-ahead.”You can re-examine him on that but not to ask questions that will show cross examination,” Justice Nwite said.

However, when the prosecution lawyer proceeded to re-examine the witness, and his questions pointed at cross-examination, as observed by Daudu SAN, the judge insisted that the parties had to address him on the specific issue.

The Defendant’s Counsel, in his address, maintained that the position was unknown to law.

“My lord, the procedure that is being sought by the prosecution by refering the witness to the document tender in Exhibit 19 and by asking him to read paragraph 1, without drawing his attention to the issue on how the document affected his evidence in chief, the question asked in cross-examination, and the ambiguity, which needs clarification, amounts to a strange and unknown procedure not covered by the Evidence Act,” he stated.

Enitan SAN, disagreed, saying that in the case of Amobi Amobi referred to by the defendant’s counsel, the Supreme Court held that the learned trial judge ought to have allowed a re-examination of Exhibit E.

He said when the defendant sought to introduce the document, the prosecution team “submitted that this document was not made by the witness and as such, he should not be allowed to speak to it under cross examination or allowed to be confronted with it.”

“Having brought it in now, during the case of the prosecution, particularly during the cross examination of PW-3, your lordship should not allow them to shut us out as that would amount to the court allowing them to blow hot and cold,” Pinheiro SAN said.

Justice Nwite thereafter adjourned to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling and continuation of trial.

The 3rd prosecution witness had, at the last hearing on Thursday, said there was no wired transfer of fees from the Kogi State Government or any of the local Governments in the state to the account of the American International School, Abuja.

He also read out a part of a previous Federal Capital Territory High Court judgment that said there was no court order for AISA to return fees to EFCC or any judgment declaring the money as proceeds of money laundering.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ebola Outbreak in DR Congo Surpasses 2,000 Cases

Published

on

17 Views

Health authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have confirmed that the ongoing Ebola outbreak has now topped 2,000 cases, marking a grim milestone in what has become the country’s most severe epidemic involving the Bundibugyo strain of the virus.

The latest figures from the Congolese Ministry of Health indicate rapid transmission in conflict-affected eastern provinces, particularly Ituri, where the outbreak was first declared in mid-May. The surge comes despite intensified response efforts, including contact tracing and community mobilization, as insecurity, population displacement, and community resistance continue to hinder containment.

Officials report that the death toll has also climbed significantly, with hundreds of fatalities recorded so far. Treatment centers in hard-hit areas are nearing capacity, and challenges persist in identifying patient zero and fully tracing contacts amid ongoing violence from armed groups. The rare Bundibugyo virus strain lacks approved vaccines or specific treatments, unlike previous Zaire strain outbreaks.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and Africa CDC have expressed deep concern over the potential for further geographic spread, including risks to neighboring countries like Uganda, where cases have already been reported. Projections suggest the outbreak could worsen substantially without accelerated interventions, with modeling indicating thousands more potential cases and deaths in the coming months if transmission is not curbed.

International partners have pledged substantial funding and resources, but humanitarian workers face logistical nightmares in displacement camps and mining areas where the virus continues to spread through community and family contacts.

Health officials are urging heightened vigilance, improved surveillance, and community cooperation as they race to contain the epidemic before it reaches even more catastrophic levels. The DRC has experienced multiple Ebola outbreaks in recent years, but this one stands out due to its speed and the complicating factors of regional instability.

Further updates will depend on daily situation reports as the response scales up.

Continue Reading

News

Rabies Outbreak Confirmed in Abuja Following Two Fatalities

Published

on

20 Views

……As NCDC Launches Fresh Vaccination Drive

Health authorities have officially confirmed a rabies outbreak in the Federal Capital Territory after two people died from the disease, prompting an urgent public health response.

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), in collaboration with the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and veterinary services, announced the confirmation on Wednesday. Both victims are reported to have succumbed to rabies following bites from suspected rabid animals, highlighting the ongoing risks posed by stray dogs and wildlife in parts of the capital.

In a swift move to contain the spread, officials have launched a fresh vaccination drive targeting dogs and other domestic animals across affected communities. The campaign aims to vaccinate thousands of pets and strays in high-risk areas, while also encouraging residents to report animal bites immediately and seek post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) at designated health facilities.

“Rabies is almost always fatal once symptoms appear, but it is entirely preventable through timely vaccination of animals and proper wound management in humans,” a health official stated. “We urge pet owners to vaccinate their dogs and avoid contact with unknown animals.”

Residents have been advised to remain vigilant, keep pets on leashes in public spaces, and visit the nearest hospital for anti-rabies treatment if bitten or scratched. Authorities are also intensifying public awareness efforts through community sensitization programs.

This latest outbreak serves as a stark reminder of the need for sustained rabies control measures in urban centers. Health teams continue to monitor the situation closely, with plans to expand the vaccination campaign if new cases emerge.

Continue Reading

News

FG Unveils Digital Platforms for Transparency

Published

on

22 Views

The Federal Government has launched three digital platforms, the Reform Tracker, Knowledge Repository, and National Strategy for Public Service Reforms (NSPSR) Dashboard to strengthen transparency, accountability, performance monitoring, and knowledge management across the Federal Public Service.

The platforms were developed by the Bureau of Public Service Reforms (BPSR) to support the effective implementation of government reforms.

Speaking at the launch in Abuja, Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, represented by his Senior Technical Adviser, Professor Babatunde Bolaji Bernard, described the platforms as an integrated digital ecosystem that will transform how reforms are monitored, documented, and communicated across Ministries, Departments, and Agencies.

According to the SGF, the Reform Tracker will provide a reliable mechanism for monitoring reform milestones, implementation timelines, and performance indicators across government institutions, helping to ensure accountability and timely delivery of reform programmes.

He explained that the Knowledge Repository will serve as a central digital library for reform-related documents, policies, reports, and case studies, preserving institutional memory, reducing duplication of efforts, and promoting evidence-based decision-making throughout the public service.

Senator Akume added that the NSPSR Dashboard will provide real-time updates on the implementation of the National Strategy for Public Service Reforms, enabling policymakers to track progress, identify gaps, measure achievements, and make informed decisions.

He said the initiative reflects the government’s commitment to building a technology-driven and results-oriented public service.

Meanwhile, Director-General of BPSR, Dr. Dasuki Ibrahim Arabi, described the launch as a major milestone in institutionalising reforms through innovation and technology.

Continue Reading

Trending