Connect with us

Business

MAN Accuses NCS, NPA Not Giving Priority to Trade Facilitation

Published

on

495 Views

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) said this morning  that some of the government’s agencies are not “walking the talk” on ease of doing business,  citing the recent introduction and implementation of the 4% Free-on-Board Levy by the Nigeria Customs Service ( NCS) and the NPA 15 percent ports tariff. 

Segun Ajayi-Kadir,  the Director-General of MAN,  stated that the Association views those development as an unfortunate addition to the 1% Comprehensive Import Supervision Scheme (CISS) fee being paid by its members at a time that all Government agencies should be seeking ways to deescalate cost of doing business in Nigeria, as it is being done in other economies. 

Ajayi-Kadir noted: ” It is equally worrisome that this is coming at a time when there is a planned 15% hike in port charges and industries are struggling with the astronomical increase in the effective import duty calculations rate.

” We had expected that the NCS would give priority to trade facilitation in view of the prevailing economic downturn, rather than exacerbating the spiraling cost of production.”

The statement reads: “This is in view of its potential wider implications on the economy in the form of low productivity, increased unemployment rate and consequent higher propensity to criminal activities and insecurity, not to mention the negative impact on the disposable income of the overall economic wellbeing of the over 220 million Nigerians. 

We had expected that, in line with the prevailing economic reform agenda of government that seeks to streamline fiscal policies and engender a progressive and business friendly tax regime, we should be witnessing a winding down of regulatory and official fees by government agencies and institutions. 

All government institutions should recommit to the reduction of the cost of doing business, expanding the scope of businesses and broadening the nation’s revenue base. 

 Our aversion to the introduction of the levy is further predicated on the following reasons: 

 1. The already high rate of calculating the customs duty exchange rate and the new levy will further escalate the cost of imported raw materials, which had earlier jumped by over 118 percent from ₦2.07 trillion in the first nine months of 2023 to ₦4.53 trillion in the same period of 2024.

  1. 2. The levy will cause heavy disruption in supply chain, trigger raw materials stock-out in many manufacturing concerns, inflict higher cost of demurrage, further increase the huge volume of unsold inventories and worsen the competitiveness of Nigerian manufacturers.
  2. 3.The levy is coming at a time when the headline inflation has hit a historic record of 34.8 percent in nearly three decades and majority of Nigerians are struggling. Therefore, the impact on the cost of locally produced items will be instant and far reaching.

4.The introduction of the levy contradicts the principles of the ongoing Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms and the spirit behind the tax bills currently being considered by the National Assembly.

These efforts are targeted at eliminating multiplicity of taxes and reduction of tax burden for households, manufacturers and other private businesses.

  1. As an addition to the existing 1% CISS fee, extant duties and other cargo clearance charges, the new Customs Operations levy will increase import transaction costs, compound the already high cost of doing business significantly. 
  2. The introduction of the levy is an additional incentive to smuggling, trade diversion, under declaration of duty and other trade infractions that has bedeviled our country, stretched the capacity of our Customs Service and undermined the revenue profile of the country. 
  3. It will jeopardize the plan of the Federal Government to boost forex earnings through non-oil export, as many manufacturing exporters rely on imports for vital inputs and machines that are not available locally. 
  4. The levy will jeopardize our aspiration to be an investment destination of choice and an industrial hub in the West African sub-region. 

The need to increase government revenue is not lost on manufacturers. We have consistently advocated for the expansion of the tax base and not introduction of new taxes or increase in existing ones. It is not helpful to kill the goose that lays the golden egg.

 Appreciable improvement in trade facilitation infrastructure and processes would encourage significant increase in volume of transactions and give rise to the much needed revenue for Government. 

This is the way to go. It is in view of the foregoing that we implore the Federal Government to urgently direct the Nigeria Customs Service to halt the implementation of the 4% Free-on-Board Levy.

We equally urge Mr. President to direct the Service to engage with relevant stakeholders and the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform in order to align with the ongoing landmark and wholesale reform agenda of Government.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

History of Naira Revaluation and Devaluation (1973–2026) (Part 1)

Why was the naira devalued?

Published

on

By

33 Views


The history of the Nigerian naira is marked by two major developments: periods when the currency gained value or was officially strengthened, and prolonged periods when it lost value against major international currencies, particularly the US dollar.


Since its introduction in 1973, the naira has undergone several exchange-rate policy changes, including fixed exchange rates, currency devaluations, foreign-exchange market liberalisation, attempts to unify exchange rates and market-driven depreciation.


The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has played a central role in managing these changes.

  1. Introduction of the Naira in 1973

  2. Nigeria introduced the naira on January 1, 1973, replacing the Nigerian pound.

  3. The conversion rate was:
    £1 Nigerian pound = ₦2.
    ₦1 = 10 shillings under the old currency system.
    ₦1 = 100 kobo.

  4. The new currency was introduced during a period of expanding oil revenues and economic growth.

  5. Nigeria initially maintained a relatively strong, managed exchange rate, supported by foreign-exchange controls and the country’s oil earnings.

  6. The introduction of the naira was a currency change, not a devaluation.
  7. The 1970s: A Relatively Strong Naira

  8. During the 1970s, rising oil revenues strengthened Nigeria’s foreign-exchange position.

  9. The government maintained a controlled exchange-rate system, initially linking the naira to the US dollar before moving to a basket of currencies representing major trading partners in 1978.

  10. The oil boom provided foreign exchange for imports, infrastructure and public expenditure.

  11. However, Nigeria’s dependence on crude oil revenues left the economy vulnerable to fluctuations in international oil prices.

  12. Key development: The naira benefited from a relatively strong external position, although its exchange rate was managed by the authorities rather than determined by an unrestricted market.
  13. The Early 1980s: Mounting Pressure on the Naira

  14. The economic situation deteriorated in the early 1980s as oil revenues weakened and foreign-exchange shortages intensified.

  15. Nigeria faced several economic challenges:
    • Declining oil receipts.
    • Rising import bills.
    • Pressure on foreign reserves.
    • Growing external debt and trade arrears.
    • Increasing demand for foreign currency.

  16. The government maintained controls on foreign exchange, but the official rate became increasingly disconnected from the rate at which foreign currency could be obtained in the parallel market.

  17. This created pressure for exchange-rate reform.
    The crisis set the stage for the introduction of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1986.
  18. 1986: Major Naira Devaluation Under SAP

  19. September 26, 1986, marked a turning point in the history of the naira.
    Under the military government of General Ibrahim Babangida, Nigeria introduced the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM) as part of the Structural Adjustment Programme.

  20. The objective was to allow market forces to play a greater role in determining the naira’s exchange rate.

  21. According to an International Monetary Fund account, the naira’s value was discounted by approximately 66 per cent at the inaugural SFEM auction.

  22. The exchange rate moved from about ₦1.60 per US dollar under the previous administered rate to approximately ₦4.60 per dollar at the initial auction.

  23. Why was the naira devalued?

  24. The policy was intended to:
    •Reduce the overvaluation of the naira.
    •Improve the allocation of scarce foreign exchange.
    •Encourage non-oil exports.
    •Improve the competitiveness of Nigerian products.
    •Reduce distortions in the foreign-exchange market.

  25. However, the weaker currency also increased the naira cost of imported goods and production inputs.

  26. The 1986 reform began a prolonged period of exchange-rate adjustments.
  27. …To be continued
Continue Reading

Business

Obasanjo Accuses Tinubu : “You Made Every Nigerian Poor By 300% Naira Devaluation”

The former President also rejected the argument that Tinubu needed more time to complete his reforms, saying he did not see the economy improving.

Published

on

By

32 Views

Image: AI generated

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has accused President Bola Tinubu of making every Nigerian poor by 300 per cent through the devaluation of the naira.

Obasanjo spoke on Wednesday during the Financial Times Africa Summit 2026 in London, United Kingdom.

He said that the naira lost its value overnight due to economic reforms undertaken by the Tinubu administration in 2023.

“We do not live in isolation as a country. We interact with the rest of the world. And overnight, you devalue the currency by 300 per cent. The naira went from N500 to a dollar to N1,500 to a dollar. What that meant was that every Nigerian is made poor by 300 per cent.”

Obasanjo said that had made Nigeria “the poverty capital of the world,” which he said meant the country had the largest number of poor people in the world.

“You cannot say to me that that is good for Nigeria. You cannot say to me that that is good for us in any sense,” he noted.

The former President also rejected the argument that Tinubu needed more time to complete his reforms, saying he did not see the economy improving.

Continue Reading

Business

CBN Licences Abbey Bank to Start Full Commercial Banking in November 2026

Adewumi said: “The year 2026 represents a defining moment in the history of Abbey. Our approval to transition to commercial banking is a testament to the work invested in building this institution and the confidence placed in us by our regulators, shareholders, customers and employees.”

Published

on

By

34 Views

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has approved Abbey Bank Plc to begin operation as a regional commercial bank, effectively from November 2026.

The licence opens retail banking, small and medium-sized enterprise lending, trade finance and corporate banking to the lender.

Abbey Bank had operated as a mortgage bank for more than three decades.

The commercial banking licence was issued in June 2026 after the bank completed its capital-raising process.

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Mobolaji Adewumi said the bank began internal discussions on the transition in 2023 and submitted a formal application in 2024.

He said regulatory approval arrived in October 2024.

Adewumi said: “The year 2026 represents a defining moment in the history of Abbey. Our approval to transition to commercial banking is a testament to the work invested in building this institution and the confidence placed in us by our regulators, shareholders, customers and employees.”

Continue Reading

Trending