Connect with us

Business

MAN Accuses NCS, NPA Not Giving Priority to Trade Facilitation

Published

on

526 Views

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) said this morning  that some of the government’s agencies are not “walking the talk” on ease of doing business,  citing the recent introduction and implementation of the 4% Free-on-Board Levy by the Nigeria Customs Service ( NCS) and the NPA 15 percent ports tariff. 

Segun Ajayi-Kadir,  the Director-General of MAN,  stated that the Association views those development as an unfortunate addition to the 1% Comprehensive Import Supervision Scheme (CISS) fee being paid by its members at a time that all Government agencies should be seeking ways to deescalate cost of doing business in Nigeria, as it is being done in other economies. 

Ajayi-Kadir noted: ” It is equally worrisome that this is coming at a time when there is a planned 15% hike in port charges and industries are struggling with the astronomical increase in the effective import duty calculations rate.

” We had expected that the NCS would give priority to trade facilitation in view of the prevailing economic downturn, rather than exacerbating the spiraling cost of production.”

The statement reads: “This is in view of its potential wider implications on the economy in the form of low productivity, increased unemployment rate and consequent higher propensity to criminal activities and insecurity, not to mention the negative impact on the disposable income of the overall economic wellbeing of the over 220 million Nigerians. 

We had expected that, in line with the prevailing economic reform agenda of government that seeks to streamline fiscal policies and engender a progressive and business friendly tax regime, we should be witnessing a winding down of regulatory and official fees by government agencies and institutions. 

All government institutions should recommit to the reduction of the cost of doing business, expanding the scope of businesses and broadening the nation’s revenue base. 

 Our aversion to the introduction of the levy is further predicated on the following reasons: 

 1. The already high rate of calculating the customs duty exchange rate and the new levy will further escalate the cost of imported raw materials, which had earlier jumped by over 118 percent from ₦2.07 trillion in the first nine months of 2023 to ₦4.53 trillion in the same period of 2024.

  1. 2. The levy will cause heavy disruption in supply chain, trigger raw materials stock-out in many manufacturing concerns, inflict higher cost of demurrage, further increase the huge volume of unsold inventories and worsen the competitiveness of Nigerian manufacturers.
  2. 3.The levy is coming at a time when the headline inflation has hit a historic record of 34.8 percent in nearly three decades and majority of Nigerians are struggling. Therefore, the impact on the cost of locally produced items will be instant and far reaching.

4.The introduction of the levy contradicts the principles of the ongoing Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms and the spirit behind the tax bills currently being considered by the National Assembly.

These efforts are targeted at eliminating multiplicity of taxes and reduction of tax burden for households, manufacturers and other private businesses.

  1. As an addition to the existing 1% CISS fee, extant duties and other cargo clearance charges, the new Customs Operations levy will increase import transaction costs, compound the already high cost of doing business significantly. 
  2. The introduction of the levy is an additional incentive to smuggling, trade diversion, under declaration of duty and other trade infractions that has bedeviled our country, stretched the capacity of our Customs Service and undermined the revenue profile of the country. 
  3. It will jeopardize the plan of the Federal Government to boost forex earnings through non-oil export, as many manufacturing exporters rely on imports for vital inputs and machines that are not available locally. 
  4. The levy will jeopardize our aspiration to be an investment destination of choice and an industrial hub in the West African sub-region. 

The need to increase government revenue is not lost on manufacturers. We have consistently advocated for the expansion of the tax base and not introduction of new taxes or increase in existing ones. It is not helpful to kill the goose that lays the golden egg.

 Appreciable improvement in trade facilitation infrastructure and processes would encourage significant increase in volume of transactions and give rise to the much needed revenue for Government. 

This is the way to go. It is in view of the foregoing that we implore the Federal Government to urgently direct the Nigeria Customs Service to halt the implementation of the 4% Free-on-Board Levy.

We equally urge Mr. President to direct the Service to engage with relevant stakeholders and the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform in order to align with the ongoing landmark and wholesale reform agenda of Government.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Bank of Ghana launches new Cedi notes

The aim is to make cash transactions more convenient and strengthen confidence in the cedi.

Published

on

By

91 Views

The Bank of Ghana has launched the Ghana Cedi Heritage Series, a new set of smaller banknotes with enhanced security features, as part of efforts to modernise its currency.

The notes will enter circulation on December 1, 2026, replacing the existing designs.

The central bank officially launched the series on Thursday, November 12, 2026.

It said the redesigned notes have improved durability, more portable sizes and stronger security features.

The aim is to make cash transactions more convenient and strengthen confidence in the cedi.

A close examination of the new Heritage Series shows that only Dr Nkrumah retained a place on the new banknotes, while the other five members are absent.

The new series features other prominent Ghanaian personalities whose contributions span politics, religion, education, public service, culture and international diplomacy.

The Heritage Series, however, adopts an individual-portrait approach, recognising personalities whose contributions helped shape Ghana’s political, educational, cultural and diplomatic history.

Here are prominent Ghanaian personalities featured on new Ghana cedi notes:

On the GH¢1 note is Agnes Oforiwa Tagoe-Quarcoopome, who is said to be the first Makola woman to open a bank account with the then Standard Bank of West Africa (now Standard Chartered Bank).

Cardinal Peter Porekuu Dery, a revered Catholic priest from Zimuopare (Ko), near Nandom in the Upper West Region of Ghana back in the 1950s, features on the GH¢2 denomination.

James Emmanuel Kwegyir-Aggrey is featured on the GH¢5 note, with Justice Annie Jiagge, the first woman in Ghana and the Commonwealth of Nations to become a judge, appearing on the GH¢10 banknote.

The GH¢20 note features Dr Ephraim Amu, the composer of the Twi version of the Ghana national anthem, Yɛn Ara Asaase Ni, while Theodosia Salome Okoh, the designer of the Ghana flag, is on the GH¢50 denomination.

Former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan features on the GH¢100 note, while Ghana’s first President, Dr Kwame Nkrumah, appears on the GH¢200 banknote.

Dr Nkrumah’s appearance on the GH¢200 note represents a change from the existing series, where his portrait appeared on the ceremonial GH¢2 denomination as part of the collective image of the Big Six.

The Big Six became prominent figures in Ghana’s independence struggle following their arrest by the British colonial authorities in 1948 after disturbances in Accra.

Continue Reading

Business

Naira Exchange Rates Friday,13 Nov 2026

The black market (parallel market) exchange rates is the most searched forex query in Nigeria.

Published

on

By

97 Views

BLACK MARKET RATES

₦1435 DOLLAR (USD)

₦1870 POUND (GBP)

₦1540 EURO (EUR)

₦950 CANADIAN DOLLAR (CAD)

₦70 SOUTH AFRICAN RAND (ZAR)

₦350 UAE DIRHAM (AED)

₦100 GHANAIAN CEDI (GHS)

₦190 CHINESE YUAN (CNY)

₦2240 WEST AFRICAN CFA F.(XOF)

₦2180 CENTRAL AFRICAN CFA F.(XAF)

₦820 AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR (AUD)

Continue Reading

Business

Exclusive:10,000MW Electricity Ambition Continues Under New Political Campaigns

Published

on

By

86 Views

By Ochefa

•Minister of Power Chief Olasunkanmi Joseph Tegbe

The Federal Government past and present has spent nearly two decades pursuing essentially the same 10,000MW electricity benchmark.

This is understandable given that electricity remains one of the biggest obstacles to industrial development in Nigeria.

That’s why in the ongoing 2027 election campaigns , the top three parties – APC, ADC, and the NDC recognise the importance of electricity to the economy, although their specific commitments differ.

APC: Plans to scale electricity generation towards 10,000MW, strengthen transmission and distribution, and expand clean energy access.

ADC: Emphasises energy-sector reforms and regional connectivity to support production and industrialisation.

NDC: Proposes expanding power generation and distribution. The NDC campaign blueprint specifically identifies an additional 10,000MW of power within four years as a target.

However, checks by Ohibaba.com shows that successive administrations have set the 10,000MW as a goal but achieving the target has remained elusive.

Here are the records:

Nigeria’s 10,000-megawatt (MW) electricity generation target dates back to the electricity expansion programme of the Olusegun Obasanjo administration (1999–2007), although successive governments adopted, modified and repeatedly renewed the target.

1. Obasanjo administration:

The original 10,000MW ambition (2005–2008).The roots of the 10,000MW target can be traced to the Federal Government’s efforts to expand electricity generation through the National Integrated Power Projects (NIPP).

Following the failure of private investment to deliver sufficient electricity, the government began directly funding new power plants from 2002.

In 2005, construction commenced on several NIPP power stations, including:

Alaoji

Geregu

Omotosho

Olorunsogo

Ihovbor

Egbema

Gbarain.

The government’s ambition was to push installed generation capacity beyond 10,000MW by the end of 2008.

An earlier policy document, however, had already established a more specific target of achieving 10,000MW of operable generation capacity by the end of 2011.

2. Yar’Adua administration: 10,000MW by 2011

The Umaru Musa Yar’Adua administration inherited the NIPP projects and retained the 10,000MW ambition.

A 2009 African Development Bank report on Nigeria’s Economic and Power Sector Reform Programme confirmed that the Federal Government expected to achieve 10,000MW of operable generation capacity by the end of 2011.

The strategy involved rehabilitating existing power stations and completing new plants under NIPP.

3. Jonathan administration: Target raised to 16,000MW

President Goodluck Jonathan’s Transformation Agenda (2011–2015) went beyond the 10,000MW benchmark.

The administration set the following targets:5,000MW by 2011.6,000MW by 2012.16,000MW by 2015.

However, by December 2012, actual generation had reached approximately 4,500MW, falling short of the 10,000MW target for that period.

4. Buhari administration: 10,000MW distributable electricityIn March 2016, President Muhammadu Buhari publicly announced a target of delivering 10,000MW of distributable electricity within three years.

He also promised to add 2,000MW to the national grid in 2016.

This was against the backdrop of the APC’s 2015 campaign manifesto, which promised to expand electricity generation and distribution to 40,000MW within four to eight years.

The distinction is important: Buhari’s 10,000MW promise referred to distributable power, not merely installed generation capacity.

5. Subsequent administrations.

The 10,000MW ambition continued under subsequent governments.

In 2021, Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo said investments exceeding $3 billion in generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure would put Nigeria on the path to achieving 10GW of electricity.

The National Development Plan 2021–2025 also incorporated a 10,000MW electricity target.

The historical significance: Why has 10,000MW remained elusive?

The recurring 10,000MW target exposes a fundamental problem with Nigeria’s electricity policy: successive administrations have announced ambitious generation targets without resolving the structural constraints affecting the entire electricity value chain.

The bigger question is how did countries like Egypt, South Africa, and Morocco attained energy security? Nigerian leaders can borrow a leaf from their strategy.

These include:

  1. 1. Gas supply constraints: Inadequate gas supply to thermal power stations.

2. Transmission limitations: Inability of the national grid to evacuate all available generation.

3.Distribution bottlenecks: Insufficient distribution infrastructure to deliver electricity to consumers.

4. Funding challenges: Persistent liquidity problems across the electricity market.

5 . Infrastructure deficits: Poor maintenance and inadequate investment in power infrastructure.

According to the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), as of October 2026, Nigeria’s installed electricity generation capacity is approximately 13,625 MW, but the amount of electricity actually available for generation is significantly lower.

What does this mean?

Nigeria has a significant gap between installed capacity and actual electricity generation.13,625 MW:

What the installed generating infrastructure can theoretically produce.4,744 MW:

What was available for dispatch in October.4,047 MW: Average electricity actually generated per hour.

This means Nigeria generated only about 30% of its installed generation capacity on average during October 2026.

Major challenge

1.The gap is associated with:Inadequate natural gas supply to thermal power plants.

2. Ageing generation infrastructure.

3.Poor maintenance and equipment failures.

4. Transmission infrastructure limitations.

5. Financial and operational challenges in the electricity market.

The big question is how did African countries like Egypt, South Africa, and Morocco attained energy security? Nigerian leaders can borrow a leaf from their strategy.

Electricity Generation Capacity of Five African Countries – 2026

Source: Afreximbank Power Industry Report 2022.

Continue Reading

Trending