Politics
Atiku Holds the Key to Obi’s Presidential Ambition, By Emeka Monye
For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.
Image: Atiku , Kwankwaso, and Obi
IN Nigerian politics, timing and coalition are often more decisive than individual popularity.
As the 2027 presidential race begins to take shape, one calculation keeps recurring in political circles: the path for Peter Obi to unseat President Bola Tinubu runs through Atiku Abubakar.
2023 election
The 2023 election proved that Nigeria’s electorate is no longer locked into the old two-party rhythm.
For the first time in the Fourth Republic, three candidates ran competitive, nationwide campaigns, forcing analysts and party strategists to rethink long-held assumptions about voter behavior, regional loyalty, and the power of structure.
Heading into February 2023, most observers expected a straight contest between the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party.
Tinubu, Atiku and Obi
Bola Tinubu, former Lagos governor and APC national leader, carried the weight of the ruling party.
Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President and perennial contender, led the PDP. Then came Peter Obi.
The former Anambra governor’s defection from the PDP to the Labour Party galvanized a youth-driven movement that defied the traditional logic of ethnic and party strongholds.
What was supposed to be a two-horse race became a three-way contest, and the results reflected it.Tinubu was declared winner with 8,794,726 votes.
Atiku followed with 6,984,640 votes, winning 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory: Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Gombe, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, and Yobe.
Obi came third with 6,101,533 votes, but his spread was striking. He carried 11 states plus the FCT: Abia, Anambra, Cross River, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, Imo, Lagos, Nasarawa, and Plateau.The numbers told a clear story.
No candidate won a majority
The combined votes of the two main opposition candidates—over 13 million—exceeded Tinubu’s total by more than 4 million.
The election was split along regional, generational, and class lines, but it also revealed a fragmented opposition that could not convert its numerical advantage into victory.
Beneath the campaign rhetoric was a deeper debate about power rotation. After eight years of Muhammadu Buhari, a northerner, many within the PDP argued that the presidency should return to the South in 2023.
It was not a constitutional requirement, but a political convention that had guided candidate selection since 1999. Senior PDP figures lobbied Atiku to step aside in the interest of equity.
The argument was straightforward: if the PDP was serious about national balance, it could not field another northerner immediately after Buhari.
Decision had consequences
Atiku, who had spent decades building a national network, disagreed. He won the party’s primary in May 2022, defeating 12 aspirants including Nyesom Wike and Bukola Saraki.His decision had consequences.
It pushed key southern PDP governors and stakeholders toward neutrality or outright defection.
It also created the opening for Obi to exit the PDP and build a movement outside the traditional party structure.
In hindsight, Atiku’s insistence preserved his base in the North but split the opposition vote in the South and Middle Belt.
Obi consolidated the South-East and South-South, broke into Lagos, and made inroads in the Christian belt of the North-Central.
Fast forward to 2027
Atiku held the core North and parts of the North-West and North-East. Tinubu took the South-West and split the North-Central. Fast forward to 2027, and the arithmetic hasn’t changed.
Tinubu will run as an incumbent with the full weight of the federal government and party machinery.
Obi has retained his support base and remains the face of the urban youth and middle-class vote. Rabiu Kwankwaso, who won Kano for the NNPP in 2023, remains a factor in the North-West.
Political analysts agree that any serious challenge to Tinubu requires the opposition to close ranks.
The most discussed scenario is a Obi-Kwankwaso ticket. Combined, their 2023 votes would exceed 7.6 million, and their regional reach covers the South-East, South-South, North-West, and pockets of the North-Central. On paper, it looks like a winning coalition.But the missing piece is Atiku’s 6.9 million votes.
Atiku’s base is concentrated in the North-East, North-West, and parts of the North-Central—regions where Obi and Kwankwaso underperformed in 2023.
Two-thirds of states and the FCT
Without that bloc, an Obi-Kwankwaso ticket would struggle to cross the constitutional requirement of 25% in two-thirds of states and the FCT.
With it, the opposition could flip enough states to make the race unwinnable for the incumbent.
This is why many in the opposition coalition argue that Atiku must be willing to sacrifice a fourth presidential run for the sake of defeating the APC.
The logic is simple: his 2023 votes have nowhere else to go. If he runs again, the opposition vote splits a third time, and Tinubu wins by default. If he steps aside and backs Obi, those votes become decisive.
The problem is not mathematical; it’s political and personal. Atiku has run for president six times and remains one of the most influential figures in the PDP.
Stepping aside would mean dismantling a structure built over 30 years and accepting a role as kingmaker rather than king.There’s also the question of trust.
After the 2023 primary and the fallout over the PDP’s zoning decision, relationships between Atiku, Obi, and the G-5 governors remain strained.
Any coalition would require ironclad agreements on power-sharing, policy direction, and the sequencing of political offices.
Ideology and messaging
Then there’s the issue of ideology and messaging. Obi’s campaign was built on “structurelessness,” competence, and anti-establishment sentiment.
Atiku represents the traditional political establishment. Merging those two brands without alienating either base will be delicate.
A closer look at the 2023 results shows where the opportunity lies. In states like Kaduna, Katsina, and Sokoto, Atiku won, but Obi came a strong second in urban centers.
Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes.
APC’s grip
In Lagos, Obi beat Tinubu outright, proving that the APC’s grip is not absolute even in its stronghold.
In the FCT, Obi won, while Atiku and Tinubu split the rest.If those patterns hold, and if Atiku’s northern base moves with him, an Obi-led ticket could redraw the electoral map.
The key would be holding the South-East and South-South, expanding in the North-Central, and peeling off enough votes in the North-West to prevent a Tinubu sweep.
Kwankwaso’s role is equally critical. Kano alone delivered 1.5 million votes to the NNPP in 2023.
A three-way deal between Obi, Kwankwaso, and Atiku would cover every major voting bloc outside the South-West.
The alternative is clear from 2023. When the opposition runs divided, the incumbent wins with a plurality.
Tinubu’s 37% vote share was the lowest for a winning candidate in Nigeria’s democratic history, yet it was enough because the opposition could not agree on a common front.
For Obi, the 2027 window may be his strongest. He has name recognition, a disciplined support base, and four years to build structure.
Northern votes
But without Atiku’s northern votes, he risks repeating 2023: winning the narrative but losing the numbers. For Atiku, the choice is equally stark.
A fourth run would likely produce a third-place finish and cement his legacy as the candidate who could not unite the opposition.
Stepping aside would be politically painful, but it would give him a chance to shape the next administration and secure his place in Nigeria’s democratic history.
Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes. He holds leverage.
Whether he uses it to run again or to enable a new opposition coalition will determine whether 2027 becomes another four years of APC rule or the first real test of an alternative.
For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.
Politics
Exclusion of candidates from INEC list: CD cautions INEC against manipulation by politicians
The organisation maintained that it was deeply troubling that candidates who emerged through primaries monitored by INEC itself could be so brazenly excluded without immediate explanation.
• Demands untainted integrity ahead of 2027 elections
A leading pro-democracy group in Nigeria, the Campaign for Democracy (CD) has raised concerns over the omission of some political parties’ candidates from the list of candidates to contest in the 2027 general elections, particularly some governorship candidates.
The pro-democracy group warned the Independent National Electoral Commission against manipulation by desperate politicians, saying any threat to what it described as “political pluralism and participatory democracy” would be resisted.
In a strongly worded statement, signed by its President, Comrade Ifeanyi Odili, and released on Wednesday, CD wondered how the candidates’ names were excluded from the final list, without any immediate explanation, and when INEC, in its earlier list made available to the public on August 29, 2026, had cleared and published them.
The statement made particular reference to the Peoples Democratic Party’s governorship candidate in Gombe State, Isa Pantami; the party’s governorship candidate in Ogun State, Ladi Adebutu, and his deputy, Yemi Sowunmi-Kolapo.
The Campaign for Democracy said the development was particularly disturbing in Ogun State, where citizens had witnessed repeated boasts and triumphalism by members of the All Progressives Congress in the state that the PDP governorship candidate would be excluded from the final list.
According to CD, as if to validate that boast, INEC went ahead to publish a list that excluded both the PDP candidate, and his deputy, Hajia Yemi Sowunmi-Kolapo, without stating any reason for their omission.
CD said, “The timing of the omissions was even more disturbing, and this was where we became concerned and alarmed. A particular instance was that of Ogun State where the state’s citizens had witnessed repeated claims and apparent triumphalism by elements within the All Progressives Congress (APC) and their supporters that the PDP governorship candidate would be disqualified from participating in the forthcoming election.
“As if to validate that boast, INEC published a list that excluded both PDP candidates without stating the reason for their omission.”
“This troubling sequence of events raises legitimate questions about the independence and impartiality of the Commission that Nigerians cannot afford to ignore,” the pro-democracy group added.
It said, “Under your leadership, Mr. Chairman, INEC bears an enormous responsibility to demonstrate impartiality, transparency, and strict adherence to the law. Unfortunately, this development has raised serious doubts about the Commission’s preparedness to conduct a credible, transparent, and inclusive election in 2027.
“The clarification by the Commission published late yesterday, three days after the incident was belated.”
The group stated, “To the best of our knowledge, these are candidates that emerged through the primaries conducted by their various political Parties which were monitored by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Information in the public domain shows clearly that these candidates were on the earlier list published on the 29th of August, 2026.
“Even though the Commission has just published a belated clarification on the incident, we consider this development deeply troubling and a serious blow to public confidence in the electoral process, particularly because the published list provided no immediate explanation for the omissions of the governorship and other candidates.”
CD, which was formed in 1991 and was among the prominent civil society organisations that fought the military for restoration of civil rule in 1999, said it decided to intervene because the omission threatens Nigeria’s democratic credentials, warning INEC Chairman, Joash Amupitan, to avoid orchestrating anything that could set the nation on fire.
The organisation maintained that it was deeply troubling that candidates who emerged through primaries monitored by INEC itself could be so brazenly excluded without immediate explanation.
The group warned that an electoral umpire must not only be independent but must be seen to be independent.
CD said information from the affected states already showed heightened anxiety that could have exploded into intractable violence before the Commission’s belated clarification, describing the delay as inexcusable tardiness.
The pro-democracy body further demanded an immediate investigation into allegations circulating in the public that some candidates’ names were electronically removed after they were duly submitted.
It vowed that as a committed pro-democracy group, it would not hesitate to mobilise citizens and pro-democracy organisations across the nation for lawful mass civic action against any threat to political pluralism and participatory democracy.
“We remind INEC that elections belong to the Nigerian people, not to any political party, individual, or governing interest.
No institution should take actions that create the impression that opposition participation can be determined by administrative discretion without transparent, constitutional justification and due process,” CD stated.
Politics
APC Makes Wike, Soludo, Adeleke State’s Campaign Coordinator
Wike belongs to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Soludo is a member of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), while Adeleke won re-election as Osun governor in 2026 under the Accord Party.
• [L-R] A collage of Soludo, Adeleke and Wike
The All Progressives Congress (APC) has named Nyesom Wike, minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT); Ademola Adeleke, Osun governor; and Chukwuma Soludo, Anambra governor, as state campaign coordinators in its expanded presidential campaign council for the 2027 general election.
This is despite their affiliations with other political parties.
Wike belongs to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Soludo is a member of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), while Adeleke won re-election as Osun governor in 2026 under the Accord Party.
Under the new arrangement, Wike will coordinate the APC campaign in Rivers State and the FCT, Soludo will oversee Anambra, while Adeleke will coordinate the campaign in Osun.
The expanded list is scheduled for inauguration by President Bola Tinubu at the Presidential Villa in Abuja on Wednesday.
The APC initially released its campaign council list on August 22, naming Abdulaziz Yari, former Zamfara governor, as director-general. Senate President Godswill Akpabio, House of Representatives Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and Yobe Governor Mai Mala Buni were appointed deputy director-generals.
Politics
BEWARE: Fake 2027 Gov’ Candidates List Circulating Online — INEC Raises Alarm
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has raised the alarm over a fraudulent publication circulating online that claims to be a special announcement about governorship candidates for the 2027 elections.
In a public notice issued on Monday, October 12, 2026, the electoral body described the document as “FAKE” and stressed that it did not originate from the Commission.
The circulating material purports to address issues affecting the list of governorship candidates in six states: Zamfara, Gombe, Delta, Plateau, Yobe, and Kano.
“The Commission wishes to categorically inform the general public that the publication is FAKE and did not originate from INEC. INEC therefore urges members of the public to disregard the fraudulent publication and refrain from sharing it,” the notice stated.
INEC further clarified that any information suggesting it has issued a special announcement concerning governorship candidates in those states is false.
The warning comes just days after the Commission published the final lists of candidates for the February 6, 2027 governorship elections.
The electoral umpire advised Nigerians, political parties, and candidates to rely solely on official notices, press releases, and information released through its verified channels.
These include the INEC website (inecnigeria.org), its Facebook page (INEC Nigeria), X and Instagram handles (@inecnigeria), and the INEC News Portal.
INEC reiterated its commitment to providing accurate electoral information and called on the public to remain vigilant against misleading publications as preparations for the 2027 elections intensify.
-
Business3 days agoNAFDAC scolds fake manufacturers: “You are killing Nigerians in order to make money”
-
Business3 days agoOyedele Chairs G-24 Call for Fairer Global Financial System, Affordable Development Financing
-
Business2 days agoNaira Exchange Rates For Thursday, October 15
-
Sports2 days agoCAF Increases Annual Funding for Member Federations to $700,000
-
Business1 day agoGermany plans tax on sugary drinks
-
Politics2 days agoExclusion of candidates from INEC list: CD cautions INEC against manipulation by politicians
-
News1 day agoASCON To Be Rebranded “National School Of Government”
-
Business1 day agoWEF could appoint Lagarde as its next chair, sources say
