Politics
Atiku Holds the Key to Obi’s Presidential Ambition, By Emeka Monye
For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.
Image: Atiku , Kwankwaso, and Obi
IN Nigerian politics, timing and coalition are often more decisive than individual popularity.
As the 2027 presidential race begins to take shape, one calculation keeps recurring in political circles: the path for Peter Obi to unseat President Bola Tinubu runs through Atiku Abubakar.
2023 election
The 2023 election proved that Nigeria’s electorate is no longer locked into the old two-party rhythm.
For the first time in the Fourth Republic, three candidates ran competitive, nationwide campaigns, forcing analysts and party strategists to rethink long-held assumptions about voter behavior, regional loyalty, and the power of structure.
Heading into February 2023, most observers expected a straight contest between the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party.
Tinubu, Atiku and Obi
Bola Tinubu, former Lagos governor and APC national leader, carried the weight of the ruling party.
Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President and perennial contender, led the PDP. Then came Peter Obi.
The former Anambra governor’s defection from the PDP to the Labour Party galvanized a youth-driven movement that defied the traditional logic of ethnic and party strongholds.
What was supposed to be a two-horse race became a three-way contest, and the results reflected it.Tinubu was declared winner with 8,794,726 votes.
Atiku followed with 6,984,640 votes, winning 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory: Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Gombe, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, and Yobe.
Obi came third with 6,101,533 votes, but his spread was striking. He carried 11 states plus the FCT: Abia, Anambra, Cross River, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, Imo, Lagos, Nasarawa, and Plateau.The numbers told a clear story.
No candidate won a majority
The combined votes of the two main opposition candidates—over 13 million—exceeded Tinubu’s total by more than 4 million.
The election was split along regional, generational, and class lines, but it also revealed a fragmented opposition that could not convert its numerical advantage into victory.
Beneath the campaign rhetoric was a deeper debate about power rotation. After eight years of Muhammadu Buhari, a northerner, many within the PDP argued that the presidency should return to the South in 2023.
It was not a constitutional requirement, but a political convention that had guided candidate selection since 1999. Senior PDP figures lobbied Atiku to step aside in the interest of equity.
The argument was straightforward: if the PDP was serious about national balance, it could not field another northerner immediately after Buhari.
Decision had consequences
Atiku, who had spent decades building a national network, disagreed. He won the party’s primary in May 2022, defeating 12 aspirants including Nyesom Wike and Bukola Saraki.His decision had consequences.
It pushed key southern PDP governors and stakeholders toward neutrality or outright defection.
It also created the opening for Obi to exit the PDP and build a movement outside the traditional party structure.
In hindsight, Atiku’s insistence preserved his base in the North but split the opposition vote in the South and Middle Belt.
Obi consolidated the South-East and South-South, broke into Lagos, and made inroads in the Christian belt of the North-Central.
Fast forward to 2027
Atiku held the core North and parts of the North-West and North-East. Tinubu took the South-West and split the North-Central. Fast forward to 2027, and the arithmetic hasn’t changed.
Tinubu will run as an incumbent with the full weight of the federal government and party machinery.
Obi has retained his support base and remains the face of the urban youth and middle-class vote. Rabiu Kwankwaso, who won Kano for the NNPP in 2023, remains a factor in the North-West.
Political analysts agree that any serious challenge to Tinubu requires the opposition to close ranks.
The most discussed scenario is a Obi-Kwankwaso ticket. Combined, their 2023 votes would exceed 7.6 million, and their regional reach covers the South-East, South-South, North-West, and pockets of the North-Central. On paper, it looks like a winning coalition.But the missing piece is Atiku’s 6.9 million votes.
Atiku’s base is concentrated in the North-East, North-West, and parts of the North-Central—regions where Obi and Kwankwaso underperformed in 2023.
Two-thirds of states and the FCT
Without that bloc, an Obi-Kwankwaso ticket would struggle to cross the constitutional requirement of 25% in two-thirds of states and the FCT.
With it, the opposition could flip enough states to make the race unwinnable for the incumbent.
This is why many in the opposition coalition argue that Atiku must be willing to sacrifice a fourth presidential run for the sake of defeating the APC.
The logic is simple: his 2023 votes have nowhere else to go. If he runs again, the opposition vote splits a third time, and Tinubu wins by default. If he steps aside and backs Obi, those votes become decisive.
The problem is not mathematical; it’s political and personal. Atiku has run for president six times and remains one of the most influential figures in the PDP.
Stepping aside would mean dismantling a structure built over 30 years and accepting a role as kingmaker rather than king.There’s also the question of trust.
After the 2023 primary and the fallout over the PDP’s zoning decision, relationships between Atiku, Obi, and the G-5 governors remain strained.
Any coalition would require ironclad agreements on power-sharing, policy direction, and the sequencing of political offices.
Ideology and messaging
Then there’s the issue of ideology and messaging. Obi’s campaign was built on “structurelessness,” competence, and anti-establishment sentiment.
Atiku represents the traditional political establishment. Merging those two brands without alienating either base will be delicate.
A closer look at the 2023 results shows where the opportunity lies. In states like Kaduna, Katsina, and Sokoto, Atiku won, but Obi came a strong second in urban centers.
Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes.
APC’s grip
In Lagos, Obi beat Tinubu outright, proving that the APC’s grip is not absolute even in its stronghold.
In the FCT, Obi won, while Atiku and Tinubu split the rest.If those patterns hold, and if Atiku’s northern base moves with him, an Obi-led ticket could redraw the electoral map.
The key would be holding the South-East and South-South, expanding in the North-Central, and peeling off enough votes in the North-West to prevent a Tinubu sweep.
Kwankwaso’s role is equally critical. Kano alone delivered 1.5 million votes to the NNPP in 2023.
A three-way deal between Obi, Kwankwaso, and Atiku would cover every major voting bloc outside the South-West.
The alternative is clear from 2023. When the opposition runs divided, the incumbent wins with a plurality.
Tinubu’s 37% vote share was the lowest for a winning candidate in Nigeria’s democratic history, yet it was enough because the opposition could not agree on a common front.
For Obi, the 2027 window may be his strongest. He has name recognition, a disciplined support base, and four years to build structure.
Northern votes
But without Atiku’s northern votes, he risks repeating 2023: winning the narrative but losing the numbers. For Atiku, the choice is equally stark.
A fourth run would likely produce a third-place finish and cement his legacy as the candidate who could not unite the opposition.
Stepping aside would be politically painful, but it would give him a chance to shape the next administration and secure his place in Nigeria’s democratic history.
Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes. He holds leverage.
Whether he uses it to run again or to enable a new opposition coalition will determine whether 2027 becomes another four years of APC rule or the first real test of an alternative.
For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.
Politics
Osun Polls: INEC Includes SDP Candidate, Deputy On Ballot Papers
Says Reproduced Ballot Papers Will arrive on Thursday
With few days to the Osun State governorship election scheduled for August 15, the Independent National Electoral Commisson (INEC) has confirmed the inclusion of the candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Dr. Francis Olugbenga Ajala and his running mate, Faseke Babajimi Oladipo on the ballot.
The decision follows a Federal High Court judgment which had ordered the commission to forthwith recognise, accept, upload, process and publish the name and particulars of Ajala as the candidate of the SDP.

INEC National Commissioner and Chairman of its Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Haruna, confirmed this in a statement, two days after the National Chairman of the SDP, Prof Sadiq Umar Abubakar Gombe, informed Arise News that the party would go to court to challenge the action of INEC.
The statement reads, “The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) wishes to inform the public that the candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) for the Osun State Governorship Election, Dr. Francis Olugbenga Ajala and his running mate, Faseke Babajimi Oladipo, have been added to the ballot for the election.
“This action has been taken in compliance with the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, delivered on 22nd July 2026 in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/344/2026, between Social Democratic Party and Dr. Francis Olugbenga Ajala on the one hand and the Independent National Electoral Commission on the other.
“The Court had ordered the Commission to forthwith recognise, accept, upload, process and publish the name and particulars of Dr. Francis Olugbenga Ajala as the candidate of the Social Democratic Party.
“Consequently, the ballot papers for the election, scheduled to hold on Saturday, August 15 2026, are being reproduced to reflect this addition, bringing to fifteen (15) the total number of political parties contesting the election.
The result sheets for the election are also being reproduced alongside the ballot papers to reflect the inclusion of the SDP candidate.
The commission wishes to inform the public that the reproduced ballot papers will arrive in Osun State on Thursday, August 13 2026, and will, same day, be moved to Local Government Area offices across the State, in line with its standard distribution procedure ahead of the election.
“INEC assures political parties, candidates, and the general public of its commitment to conducting a free, fair, and credible election in Osun State.”
Politics
Obasanjo faults court determining election winner , at GJF Democracy Dialogue
Obasanjo questioned whether it was democratic for millions of citizens to cast their votes only for a few judges to determine the final outcome.
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has expressed concern over the growing role of the judiciary in determining election outcomes in Nigeria.
Obasanjo stated this during the 2026 Goodluck Jonathan Foundation (GJF) Democracy Dialogue at the Ahmadu Bello International Conference Centre, Bauchi.
Obasanjo chaired the event yesterday emphasising that court undermines the essence of democracy when the votes of millions are ultimately decided by a handful of judges.
The dialogue, with the theme, “Beyond Elections: Can Political Parties and Judiciary Save African Democracy?”, brought together political leaders, statesmen, scholars and democracy advocates from Nigeria and other African countries.
Obasanjo questioned whether it was democratic for millions of citizens to cast their votes only for a few judges to determine the final outcome.
“If millions of people have voted and five people would form a decision either in favour or against the decision of millions of people, is that democracy?” he queried.
He also questioned the independence of the judiciary, asking whether it remained truly independent or was being influenced by the government
Politics
2027: Ezekwesili Backs Peter Obi for President [Here’s Why]
Nigerians should not regard the country’s deterioration as an unavoidable fate.
Dr Oby Ezekwesili / File photo
Former Minister of Education, Dr Oby Ezekwesili, has urged Nigerians to reject the growing acceptance of the country’s decline as inevitable, describing the situation as the product of a failed national design that citizens must challenge.
Ezekwesili, during an appearance on Arise News, reaffirmed her support for former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
In her words , Nigerians should “vote for themselves” by demanding leadership founded on character, competence and capacity rather than primordial considerations.
Ezekwesili- the founder and chairperson of the School of Politics, Policy and Governance (SPPG) and the CEO of Human Capital Africa, argued that one of Nigeria’s greatest problems was the resignation of citizens to deteriorating conditions and the accompanying erosion of the dignity and value of human life.
“What we have to show for it is the complete collapse of the dignity of the human being and the dignity of life.
It’s like we have zeroed out on the value of life, and yet we continue to think that somehow, if we just keep doing elections, we’ll be fine,” she said.
“I am challenging that and saying that Nigerians should at least vote for themselves. If no one votes for you in terms of the leaders you’re choosing, vote for yourselves.
” Nigerians should not regard the country’s deterioration as an unavoidable fate.
“The greatest tragedy of the country is this resignation—that this is our destiny.
I say no, this is by design.“It is not our destiny, this is by design. This design needs to be challenged,” she said.
Ezekwesili also called for a renewed national conversation aimed at establishing a common identity, shared values and a social contract capable of strengthening cohesion among Nigerians.
She described the Nigerian construct as having been effectively “orphaned”, arguing that the absence of social cohesion and social capital was worsening the country’s problems.
“The design that we run right now has not worked for us, we do need to design again,” she said…
Reaffirming her support for Obi, Ezekwesili said that her assessment remained based on the three criteria of character, competence and capacity rather than ethnic, religious or other primordial considerations.
“In 2023, I made it very clear that, using the criteria on which I see leadership either fail or succeed to govern well… the other two candidates score considerably lower than what you would assign to former Governor Obi, and so I was going to stand with Governor Obi.
“I don’t think that anything has really significantly changed,” she said.
Ezekwesili, however, cautioned against reducing the broader conversation about Nigeria’s future to Obi or any single presidential candidate.
“Don’t make this about Peter Obi. I don’t want us to personalise. I’m interested in the construct,” she said.
She argued that Nigerians should assess those seeking public office at all levels on ethical character, competence and capacity, saying these attributes increase the likelihood that decisions in government would advance the common good rather than private interests.
Ezekwesili consequently called for more credible Nigerians possessing those attributes to contest local government, state and federal elections, both for legislative and executive positions.
Speaking about her previous experience in government, the former minister also addressed her differences with former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, saying her concerns were not personal but related to what she described as resistance to reforms she considered critical to Nigeria’s development.
She recalled Nigeria’s debt burden and the effort to create fiscal space for greater investment in health, education and other growth-enhancing sectors.
According to her, concerns from international partners over Nigeria’s management of public resources contributed to her determination to pursue reforms in public procurement and demonstrate that the country could achieve greater value for money.
Ezekwesili said the experience reinforced her belief that Nigeria’s problems require institutional reforms rather than simply changing personalities at election time.
While maintaining her preference for Obi based on her stated leadership criteria, she said the deeper issue for Nigerians should be building institutions and a political system capable of consistently producing leadership that serves the public interest.▼
-
Crime3 days agoGovernor Mbah Commends Security Forces Over Arrest Of Affa Church Kidnappers
-
International3 days agoTrump cancels 175,000 visas for violations of public safety
-
Business3 days agoNaira Exchange Rates Tuesday, August 11
-
News3 days agoScavengers Damaging Lagos Bridges [PHOTOS]
-
Crime3 days agoUK court jails Congolese for murder of Nigerian
-
Politics3 days ago2027: Ezekwesili Backs Peter Obi for President [Here’s Why]
-
News3 days agoNLC disrupts Air Peace flight
-
Business23 hours agoAzikel Refinery in Bayelsa Set To Add 25,000 bpd To National Capacity
