Connect with us

News

BREAKING: There Will Never Be a Live Broadcast of Election Petition Proceedings – Tinubu, Shettima Boast

Published

on

493 Views

The President-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the Vice President-elect, Kashim Shettima, have urged the Presidential Election Petition Court to dismiss the application by Atiku Abubakar and the Peoples Democratic Party for a live broadcast of proceedings, while arguing that the relief sought by the applicants are not such that the court could grant it.

Both Tinubu and Shettima said “With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court,” .

Besides describing the application as frivolous, they said the court is not a soapbox, stadium or theatre where the public should be entertained.

Through their team of lawyers, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, they both wondered why a petitioner would file an application to distract the court and waste its precious time, while stating, in the counter affidavit, that the application relates to policy formulation of the court, which is outside the PEPC’s jurisdiction as constituted.

Olanipekun stated that: “The application also touches on the powers and jurisdiction invested in the President of the Court of Appeal by the Constitution, over which this honourable court as presently constituted cannot entertain.

“The application touches on the administrative functions, which are exclusively reserved for the President of the Court of Appeal.

“The application is aimed at dissipating the precious judicial time of this honourable court.

“The said application does not have any bearing with the petition filed by the petitioners before this honourable court.

“It is in the interest of justice for this honourable court to dismiss the said application filed by the petitioners,” they said.

In an attached written address, the respondents faulted the applicants’ reference to the fact that virtual proceedings were allowed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They argued that Atiku and his party failed to draw the court’s attention to the fact that practice directions were made by the respective courts for the exercise.

“Another angle to this very curious application is the invitation it extends to the court to make an order that it cannot supervise.

“The position of the law remains, and we do submit that the court, like nature, does not make an order in vain, or an order which is incapable of enforcement,” the respondents stated.

More so, they stated that “At the very best, this application is academic, very otiose, very unnecessary, very time-wasting, most unusual and most unexpected, particularly, from a set of petitioners, who should be praying for the expeditious trial of their petition.

“Petitioners have brought their application under Section 36(3) of the Constitution which provides that the proceedings of a court/tribunal shall be held in public.

“The word ‘public’ as applied under Section 36(3) of the Constitution has been defined in a plethora of judicial authorities to mean a place where members of the public have unhindered access, and the court itself, sitting behind open doors, not in the camera.

“Even in situations where a class action is presented, the particular people constituting the class being represented by the plaintiffs or petitioners are always defined in the originating process.

“Here, in this application, the public at whose behest this application has been presented is not defined, not known, not discernable.

“Beyond all these, it is our submission that the court of law must and should always remain what it is, what it should be and what it is expected to be: a serene, disciplined, hallowed, tranquil, honourable and decorous institution and place.

“It is not a rostrum or a soapbox. It is not also a stadium or theatre. It is not an arena for ‘public’ entertainment.

“With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court.”

News

‎”I Warned Them The Coup Would Fail” — Islamic Cleric’s Video Confession Played in Court

‎‎In a ruling, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness and admissibility of both the written and video statements of all six defendants.

Published

on

By

27 Views

‎A Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday viewed a video recording containing the alleged confession of the sixth defendant in the ongoing trial of persons accused of conspiring to plot a coup.

In the video, defendant Sheikh Sani Abdulkadir told investigators that he had warned the alleged plotters the plan would fail and that they would eventually be exposed.‎‎

The video was played during the continuation of trial proceedings, with the fourth prosecution witness, identified as PW4, still in the witness box.‎‎In the recording previewed before the court, Abdulkadir, who described himself as an Islamic cleric, said he knew the alleged ringleader, Colonel Maaji, for less than a year.

He testified that he was approached through a man identified as Sanda for prayers concerning the alleged coup plot.‎‎

According to Abdulkadir, Sanda informed him that his “oga” intended to stage a coup and needed spiritual prayers and divination regarding its success.‎‎

Abdulkadir told investigators that after conducting prayers, he informed them the operation would fail and that two persons would eventually betray those involved.‎‎

He said a message was later relayed back to him through Sanda, requesting further prayers so that the two individuals would not betray the group.‎‎

The defendant further stated that money was subsequently sent to him for prayers and charity, while names of individuals allegedly involved in the plot were also forwarded to him for inclusion in the prayers.‎‎

He said shortly after the prayers commenced, Sanda informed him that Colonel Maaji had not been seen for four days, adding that he later learned through media reports that arrests had been made over an alleged coup plot.‎‎In the video, Abdulkadir maintained that the funds transferred to him were not payments for supporting a coup but were meant for prayers.‎‎

He also told investigators that he never reported the alleged plot because he did not know who to report to, despite admitting that he understood a coup to mean a military overthrow of government.‎‎

The defendant narrated that he was eventually arrested after visiting the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over restrictions placed on his bank account.‎‎

According to him, he had gone to withdraw the money transferred to him when he discovered that his account had been flagged.‎‎

He said after contacting an EFCC deputy director, he was invited to the commission’s office, where he explained that the money was meant for prayers.‎

Abdulkadir insisted in the recording that he did not make any statement relating to a coup while in EFCC custody.‎‎

Before the video ended, the defendant also stated that nobody assaulted or tortured him and that his statements were made voluntarily.‎‎

Following the playback, the prosecution sought to tender the extra-judicial statements allegedly made by the first to fifth defendants before a Special Investigation Panel and military police authorities, as well as the sixth defendant’s statement made before military police investigators.‎‎

However, counsel to all six defendants separately objected to the admissibility of the statements and accompanying video recordings.‎‎

The lawyers to the defendants argued that the statements were either not voluntarily made or were obtained in violation of provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).‎‎

Counsel to the first defendant argued that the written statement sought to be tendered did not correspond with what was shown in the video evidence regarding voluntariness.‎‎

The second defendant’s lawyer contended that his client was neither informed of his right to legal representation nor provided access to counsel before the statement was recorded, adding that the video shown in court was not a recording of the making of the written statement sought to be tendered.‎‎

The third defendant equally challenged the admissibility of the statement, arguing that the contents of the video differed from the written extra-judicial statement.‎‎

Counsel to the fourth defendant argued that the video and statement contravened Sections 15 and 17 of the ACJA, which provide for the presence of legal representation during statement-taking.‎‎

He further alleged that his client was coerced into making the statement and argued that the recording failed to show whether the defendant’s legs were free at the time the video was made.‎‎

The fifth defendant’s lawyer also opposed the admissibility of the statements on grounds of alleged inducement, torture, and non-compliance with provisions of the ACJA and the Evidence Act.‎‎

He further argued that since there were multiple defendants in the matter, the court ought to conduct separate trial-within-trial proceedings for each disputed statement rather than a joint exercise.‎‎

Counsel to the sixth defendant similarly objected to the admissibility of both the written and video statements credited to Abdulkadir, insisting they were obtained through inducement and were not voluntarily made.

‎‎The matter was subsequently adjourned until May 12 at 12 noon for the continuation of proceedings.

‎‎Responding, the prosecution urged the court to reject the defence arguments and order a single trial-within-trial proceeding for all the disputed statements.‎‎

The prosecution argued that the law did not require separate proceedings for each defendant and maintained that the trial judge retained discretion over how evidence is received.

‎‎In a ruling, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness and admissibility of both the written and video statements of all six defendants.

‎‎The matter was subsequently adjourned until May 12 at 12 noon for the continuation of proceedings.

Continue Reading

News

Lagos to launch own driver’s license

The driver’s license project, which would be implemented in collaboration with the federal government, is optional for motorists to obtain the Federal license or the new state driver’s license aimed at enhancing safety, sanity, among others, on the roads.

Published

on

By

25 Views

Photo: Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu

The Lagos State Government is coming out with its owned driver’s license in as part of efforts to ensure sanity and safety on roads across the metropolis.

Commissioner for Transportation, Oluwaseun Osiyemi, disclosed this on Monday, at the 2025 annual ministerial briefing, commemorating the seventh year in the second term in office of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, Dr. Obafemi, held at Alausa, Ikeja.

According to Osiyemi, the driver’s license project, which would be implemented in collaboration with the federal government, is optional for motorists to obtain the Federal license or the new state driver’s license aimed at enhancing safety, sanity, among others, on the roads.

Osiyemi added that it would ensure prompt issuance, as opposed to the usual delays being experienced with the existing process.

Continue Reading

News

INEC needs1.4m corps members for 2027 election manpower

The INEC chairman broke down the 2027 deployment figures, saying 707,384 corps members would be required for the Presidential and National Assembly election scheduled for January 16, 2027, and the same number for the Governorship and Houses of Assembly election on February 6, 2027 — bringing the combined total to 1,414,768.

Published

on

By

25 Views

Photo:INEC Chairman Professor Joash Amupitan and NYSC Director-General Brigadier General Olakunle Nafiu. Photo: INEC|X

INEC Chairman Professor Joash Amupitan said on Monday that the Commission needs more than 1.4 million national youth corps members for the 2027 general election.

Amupitan made the disclosure when he paid a courtesy visit to the NYSC Director-General, Brigadier General Olakunle Nafiu at the corps’ headquarters, Yakubu Gowon House, in Abuja.

” You provide the heartbeat of our field operations. When we speak of election manpower, we are essentially speaking of your corps members.

They are the most dedicated, educated, and patriotic election duty staff we have, and their presence at the polling units brings a level of neutrality and public confidence that is irreplaceable,” Amupitan told the NYSC management team.

The INEC chairman broke down the 2027 deployment figures, saying 707,384 corps members would be required for the Presidential and National Assembly election scheduled for January 16, 2027, and the same number for the Governorship and Houses of Assembly election on February 6, 2027 — bringing the combined total to 1,414,768.

An additional 52,446 corps members would be needed for the Ekiti and Osun governorship elections and bye-elections in Nasarawa, Enugu, Rivers, Ondo, Kebbi, and Kano states.

The figures represent a substantial jump from the 2023 general election, where INEC deployed approximately 1.2 million ad hoc staff in total, with over 70 percent — nearly 850,000 individuals — drawn from NYSC ranks and student volunteers.

Continue Reading

Trending