Connect with us

News

BREAKING: There Will Never Be a Live Broadcast of Election Petition Proceedings – Tinubu, Shettima Boast

Published

on

473 Views

The President-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the Vice President-elect, Kashim Shettima, have urged the Presidential Election Petition Court to dismiss the application by Atiku Abubakar and the Peoples Democratic Party for a live broadcast of proceedings, while arguing that the relief sought by the applicants are not such that the court could grant it.

Both Tinubu and Shettima said “With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court,” .

Besides describing the application as frivolous, they said the court is not a soapbox, stadium or theatre where the public should be entertained.

Through their team of lawyers, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, they both wondered why a petitioner would file an application to distract the court and waste its precious time, while stating, in the counter affidavit, that the application relates to policy formulation of the court, which is outside the PEPC’s jurisdiction as constituted.

Olanipekun stated that: “The application also touches on the powers and jurisdiction invested in the President of the Court of Appeal by the Constitution, over which this honourable court as presently constituted cannot entertain.

“The application touches on the administrative functions, which are exclusively reserved for the President of the Court of Appeal.

“The application is aimed at dissipating the precious judicial time of this honourable court.

“The said application does not have any bearing with the petition filed by the petitioners before this honourable court.

“It is in the interest of justice for this honourable court to dismiss the said application filed by the petitioners,” they said.

In an attached written address, the respondents faulted the applicants’ reference to the fact that virtual proceedings were allowed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They argued that Atiku and his party failed to draw the court’s attention to the fact that practice directions were made by the respective courts for the exercise.

“Another angle to this very curious application is the invitation it extends to the court to make an order that it cannot supervise.

“The position of the law remains, and we do submit that the court, like nature, does not make an order in vain, or an order which is incapable of enforcement,” the respondents stated.

More so, they stated that “At the very best, this application is academic, very otiose, very unnecessary, very time-wasting, most unusual and most unexpected, particularly, from a set of petitioners, who should be praying for the expeditious trial of their petition.

“Petitioners have brought their application under Section 36(3) of the Constitution which provides that the proceedings of a court/tribunal shall be held in public.

“The word ‘public’ as applied under Section 36(3) of the Constitution has been defined in a plethora of judicial authorities to mean a place where members of the public have unhindered access, and the court itself, sitting behind open doors, not in the camera.

“Even in situations where a class action is presented, the particular people constituting the class being represented by the plaintiffs or petitioners are always defined in the originating process.

“Here, in this application, the public at whose behest this application has been presented is not defined, not known, not discernable.

“Beyond all these, it is our submission that the court of law must and should always remain what it is, what it should be and what it is expected to be: a serene, disciplined, hallowed, tranquil, honourable and decorous institution and place.

“It is not a rostrum or a soapbox. It is not also a stadium or theatre. It is not an arena for ‘public’ entertainment.

“With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court.”

News

NEC, Police Intensify Security Plans Ahead of 2027 General Elections

Published

on

20 Views

The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Professor Joash Amupitan, SAN, has described security as the foundation of credible elections, calling it the “first and last mile” of the electoral process.

He made the remark during a courtesy visit to the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, in Abuja, where he sought stronger collaboration between INEC and the Nigeria Police Force ahead of the 2027 General Elections.

Professor Amupitan said that preparations for the elections were already underway, with Presidential and National Assembly polls scheduled for January 16, 2027, while Governorship and State Assembly elections are fixed for February 6, 2027.

He noted that the release of the election timetable and ongoing political party activities, including ward congresses and conventions, have effectively activated the electoral process and heightened security concerns nationwide.

The INEC Chairman also pointed to upcoming off-cycle governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun States, as well as several bye-elections across the country, describing them as important tests for Nigeria’s democracy.

He warned that electoral malpractice, vote buying, political violence and insecurity remain major threats capable of undermining public confidence in the electoral system.

Professor Amupitan stressed the need for proactive policing, intelligence gathering and early risk assessments to identify potential flashpoints before the elections, and reaffirmed INEC’s commitment to working closely with security agencies through the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (CCES), describing it as central to ensuring the safety of voters, electoral personnel and materials during the polls.

The Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu,in his remarks assured INEC of the Police Force’s readiness to provide adequate security before, during and after the elections.

He disclosed that nationwide intelligence mapping and threat assessments had already commenced, with concerns such as political violence, illegal arms proliferation, voter intimidation, cyber threats and attacks on electoral infrastructure identified as priority risks.

The IGP also pledged that the Police would remain professional, impartial and guided strictly by the Constitution and the Electoral Act, and warned that officers involved in partisan activities would face disciplinary action, while personnel assigned to election duties would undergo intensive training in electoral security management, human rights compliance and crowd control.

He further called for stronger inter-agency cooperation, joint trainings and sustained stakeholder engagements to guarantee peaceful and credible elections in 2027.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: IED Explosion Kills Six, Injures Six Others in Zamfara State

Published

on

23 Views

At least six people were killed and six others injured after an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) exploded in Zamfara State on Thursday.

The blast occurred in an unspecified area of the state, according to initial reports. Details on the exact location and circumstances surrounding the explosion remain limited as security forces have cordoned off the scene.

Emergency responders and security personnel have been deployed to the area. The injured victims have been rushed to nearby hospitals for treatment.

This incident comes amid ongoing security challenges in parts of Zamfara State. Authorities are yet to issue an official statement or confirm the cause of the explosion.

More details are expected as the situation develops.

Continue Reading

News

‎‎JUST IN: Former Power Minister Mamman Convicted of N33.8bn Fraud‎‎

Justice James Omotosho held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, finding Mamman guilty of illegally diverting public funds linked to the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power projects.

Published

on

By

29 Views

[File photo] : former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman

A Federal High Court in Abuja has convicted former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman, on a 12‑count charge of fraud and money laundering involving about ₦33.8 billion. ‎‎

Mamman, who served in the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, was found complicit in the illegal diversion of public funds totalling about ₦33.8 billion.

The court found that he made a cash payment of $655,700 (equivalent to ₦200 million) for landed property in Abuja, without recourse to a financial institution.

Justice James Omotosho held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, finding Mamman guilty of illegally diverting public funds linked to the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power projects.‎‎

The court also found that Mamman used the funds for personal gain, including paying $655,700 (about ₦200 million) in cash for landed property in Abuja—beyond the legal limit—and acquiring luxury assets in Nigeria and abroad. ‎‎

Justice Omotosho described the prosecution’s evidence as “overwhelming,” saying Mamman failed to offer any credible defence, while the EFCC presented 17 witnesses and 43 exhibits to support the case. ‎‎

The court noted that most of the funds were siphoned through Bureau de Change operators (BDCs), who converted the money into foreign currencies and handed it over to the defendant.

“The evidence of the prosecution is overwhelming as against the scanty and almost absent defence of the defendant.

“The defendant did not offer any credible evidence to rebut the prosecution’s case,” Justice Omotosho held.

Meanwhile, the judge has adjourned the matter to a later date for sentencing. ‎‎‎

Continue Reading

Trending