Connect with us

Business

Avoiding Legal Problems: The Importance of Due Diligence Before Buying Property in Nigeria by Dennis Isong

Skipping due diligence before buying property in Nigeria can lead to devastating legal problems.

Published

on

392 Views

Consider Tunde’s story. Tunde, a hopeful investor, trusted in promises and skipped due diligence.

He ended up with land under government acquisition, facing the bitter consequences of a hasty decision.

His story echoes through the real estate market, serving as a cautionary tale to those who believe shortcuts are harmless.

As a realtor with years of experience, I’ve seen many lessons in real estate, and Tunde’s story is one of them.

In September 2020, Tunde reached out to me after reading one of my articles.

He was thrilled about buying land in Folu Ise village, Ibeju-Lekki, because it was very cheap—just around N300,000.

I advised him to verify the land’s documents to ensure it wasn’t under government acquisition.

However, because the real estate company behind the deal was popular,

Tunde chose to trust them and rushed into the purchase.

Later, Tunde found out the land was under government acquisition and couldn’t be used.

He lost a significant amount of money and learned a painful lesson.

Unfortunately, this wasn’t an isolated case—many investors who bought land in that location around that time have faced similar losses.

This is why working with an experienced and thorough realtor is crucial. I ensure my clients avoid these pitfalls and make secure, informed investments.

Whether you’re a first-time buyer or a seasoned investor, taking the time to verify, investigate, and confirm every aspect of a property before purchasing is a prudent decision that can save you from heartache and financial ruin.

It’s a humid afternoon in Lagos, and you’re sitting across from a beaming seller at a bustling cafe.

He’s selling you a dream—a piece of land in a prime location, promising high returns and a secure future.

The deal seems too good to pass up. Excited by the possibilities, you shake hands, exchange money, and leave with a sense of accomplishment. But what happens next?

Months down the line, reality hits hard. You receive a letter from a government agency claiming ownership of the land.

The seller has disappeared, and your dreams of building a home or starting a business are shattered.

The money you invested seems irretrievable, and legal battles loom ominously on the horizon.

The regret sinks in—why didn’t you verify everything before signing the dotted line?

Skipping due diligence before buying property in Nigeria can lead to devastating legal problems.

It’s not just about securing a good deal; it’s about protecting your investment, your future, and your peace of mind.

The Heartbreak of Legal Issues Imagine the emotional turmoil of realizing that the property you thought was yours is entangled in legal disputes.

The stress of navigating complex legal systems, the financial burden of legal fees, and the uncertainty of the outcome can weigh heavily on anyone.

It’s a scenario that no one wants to experience, yet many unwitting buyers find themselves in precisely this predicament.

Why Due Diligence Matters

Due diligence isn’t just a formality—it’s your shield against potential disasters.

Here’s why taking the time to investigate before buying property in Nigeria is crucial:

1. Verifying Ownership and Title The first step in due diligence is confirming that the seller has legal ownership of the property and can transfer that ownership to you.

In Nigeria, where land ownership can be contentious and documentation irregular, verifying the title is non-negotiable.

Without this step, you risk buying property that someone else may claim as theirs, leading to legal battles that could tie up your investment indefinitely.

2. Uncovering Hidden Liabilities Properties can come with hidden liabilities such as unpaid taxes, mortgages, or pending litigation. Without due diligence, you might inherit these financial burdens along with the property. Imagine buying what seems like a lucrative plot of land, only to discover hefty tax bills or unresolved disputes that threaten your financial stability.

3. Ensuring Compliance with Regulations Local regulations, zoning laws, environmental restrictions—these are just some of the regulatory aspects that can affect your property’s use and value.

Ignoring these factors can result in penalties, restrictions on developmand ent, or even demolition orders. Due diligence ensures that the property you intend to buy aligns with your plans and complies with all legal requirements.

4. Assessing Market Value A property’s market value isn’t always what it seems. Sellers may inflate prices, especially in high-demand areas or emerging markets.

By conducting due diligence, including market analysis and comparative valuations, you can negotiate from a position of knowledge.

Knowing the true value protects you from overpaying and ensures that your investment is financially sound.

5. Protecting Your Peace of Mind Investing in real estate should be exciting, not anxiety-inducing.

Proper due diligence provides peace of mind, knowing that you’ve done everything possible to safeguard your investment.

It’s about making informed decisions rather than taking blind risks, ensuring that your property purchase is a step towards your goals, not a leap into uncertainty.

Conclusion

In the fast-paced world of real estate investment in Nigeria, due diligence isn’t just advisable—it’s essential.

It’s the difference between a successful transaction and a costly mistake.

Whether you’re a first-time buyer or a seasoned investor, taking the time to verify, investigate, and confirm every aspect of a property before purchasing is a prudent decision that can save you from heartache and financial ruin.

So, before you sign that contract or transfer that payment, ask yourself: Have I done my due diligence?

The answer could make all the difference in your real estate journey.

Written by Dennis Isong, your trusted advisor in Nigeria’s real estate market.

Let’s ensure your next investment is a smart and secure one.

STOP LOSING MONEY IN LAGOS REAL ESTATE! Learn How to Protect Your Investment Today. => LandProperty.ng/free

Your future deserves the assurance of due diligence.

Business

BREAKING: First Abu Dhabi Bank to establish branch in Nigeria

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) is the UAE’s largest bank, formed in 2017 by the merger of First Gulf Bank and National Bank of Abu Dhabi.

Published

on

By

15 Views

•Photo: Nigeria’s Minister of State for Finance, Dr Doris Uzoka- Anite with the executives of First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)

First Abu Dhabi Bank is prepared to establish a branch in Nigeria.

This was the outcome of a strategic discussion  between Nigeria’s Minister of State for Finance, Dr Doris Uzoka- Anite with the executives of First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) on enhanced financial collaboration ahead of the Bank’s plans to establish a branch in Nigeria. 

“This engagement reflects growing confidence in Nigeria’s reforms and our commitment to attracting credible global capital to support growth and development,” said the minister on her X.

Uzoka- Anite emphasised that the engagement focused on opportunities for strengthened financial intermediation, increased capital flows, and expanded banking services to support Nigeria’s economic reforms and development priorities.

Uzoka-Anite reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to creating an enabling environment for global investors, noting that the planned entry of FAB reflects growing international confidence in Nigeria’s reforms and improving investment climate.

A background check on the Bank showed that First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) is the UAE’s largest bank, formed in 2017 by the merger of First Gulf Bank and National Bank of Abu Dhabi.

Headquartered in Abu Dhabi, it offers corporate, investment, and personal banking services across 20+ markets. FAB is recognized as one of the world’s safest institutions.

Aiming to be the best Arab bank for the Arab world, it recently reported a 22% increase in net profit for Q4 2024, driven by strong business volumes.

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria’s economy may be back from the brink — The Economist

Improvements in macroeconomic stability are restoring investor confidence.

Published

on

By

67 Views

President Bola Tinubu

A spate of painful reforms is beginning to show results.

When nigeria returned to civilian rule in 1999, Olusegun Obasanjo, the elected president, set out to clean up the economy after years of mismanagement by military governments.

Initially dismissed by critics, by the end of his second term Mr Obasanjo’s liberal policies had tamed inflation, spurred investment and raised annual gdp growth to around 7 percent.

It didn’t last. Over the past decade gdp per person has fallen.

Yet evidence is now mounting that another stretch of “golden years”, as one analyst calls the period following Mr Obasanjo’s liberalisation, may be on the cards.

In the past two and a half years Bola Tinubu, who in Mr Obasanjo’s day was the governor of Lagos and was elected president in 2023, has been enacting his own set of structural reforms.

As he gears up to run for a second term in 2027, they may be starting to pay off.

It is difficult to overstate the mess Mr Tinubu inherited.

When he took office in 2023, the country’s central bank had $7 billion (equivalent to 1.4% of gdp at the time) in obligations it could not meet, prompting international investors to flee en masse.

The bank’s credibility had been dented by a recklessly loose monetary policy, its mismanagement of dwindling foreign-exchange reserves and efforts to maintain an unsustainable tiered exchange-rate system.

Poverty has risen. But it looks as though Mr Tinubu’s bitter medicine is helping.

In 2022 alone the cash-strapped government spent some $10 billion, equivalent to 2.2% of gdp, on a ruinous fuel subsidy.

To fix things, Mr Tinubu’s government got on with a package of drastic structural reforms. It abolished the fuel subsidy and abandoned that multi-tiered system of dollar-pegged exchange rates, largely allowing the naira to float.

The Central Bank aggressively tightened monetary policy to curb the resulting bout of inflation.

The government also moved to improve security in the Niger Delta and offered a range of tax incentives to investors to boost dwindling oil production.

Nearly three years on, Nigeria’s 230 million people, especially the poor and the middle class, are still reeling from increases in fuel and food prices.

Poverty has risen. But it looks as though Mr Tinubu’s bitter medicine is helping.

The annual inflation rate, which hit a nearly 30-year high of 34.8% in December 2024, fell to 15.2% in December 2025.

Growth is returning.

The IMF expects the economy to expand by 4.4% in 2026.

Following two steep devaluations in 2023, the naira has stabilised (see chart).

The Central Bank’s foreign-exchange reserves have risen to $46 billion, their highest level in seven years.

Improvements in macroeconomic stability are restoring investor confidence.

On January 22nd Shell, a British company, said it hopes in 2027 to finalise plans, with partners, to develop a $20 billion offshore oilfield that has been sitting untapped for over 20 years.

Exxon Mobil, an American firm, has committed $1.5 billion to deep water development until 2027.

Local business leaders are more upbeat, too.

Oil-and-gas production is rising, much of it driven by local firms plugging leaks and improving output in onshore projects in the Niger Delta, which has become safer thanks to Mr Tinubu’s focus on security there.

All this should give the government some fiscal breathing room, particularly as the cheaper naira begins to raise the competitiveness of Nigeria’s non-oil exports such as cocoa and cashew nuts.

Recent reforms to taxation and tax collection, Mr Tinubu’s latest project, should help improve revenues further in the coming years.

Falling inflation should eventually begin to ease the cost-of-living pain.

However, even optimists have plenty of reasons to be cautious.

Savings from the fuel subsidy have largely been spent on servicing the public debt, which is still rising as the government continues to borrow against future sales of oil to fund its deficit.

Currently, some 60% of revenues are consumed by debt service.

On January 20th Nigeria’s finance minister said the government hoped to borrow less this year, but current budget projections suggest that is not realistic.

“The government is broke.

There’s nothing to invest in the future, that’s the truth,” says Esili Eigbe of Escap, a Nigerian consultancy.

Unless the government cuts civil-service salaries, another big chunk of spending, or is able to restructure loans to make them cheaper, the extra revenue from recent tax reforms looks unlikely to be available for improving infrastructure or to pay for public health care and education.

“They’ve brought the deficit down, but they don’t seem to show any greater ability to get capital projects out of the door,“ says David Cowan, an economist at Citi, an American bank.

All this means that it will take a long time for ordinary Nigerians, who until now have mostly borne the pain of Mr Tinubu’s reforms, to feel any benefit.

Buying food has been a particular struggle, not just for the 42% of Nigerians who live on less than $3 a day, the World Bank’s definition of extreme poverty, but also for the urban middle class.

The price of a kilo of rice has nearly quadrupled since May 2023, while wages have barely budged.

Even though inflation is now falling, many still struggle to afford enough to eat.

Mr Obasanjo’s reforms in the early 2000s aimed to increase economic dynamism and improve people’s lives by attracting fresh capital investment into newly privatised sectors.

By the end of his second term in 2007, domestic companies were worth $85 billion, up from $3 billion in 1999.

Mr Tinubu, by contrast, has so far focused on restoring stability and reviving the country’s ailing oil-and-gas sector. To bring about more golden years for Nigerians, he needs to go beyond that. ■

Credit: The Economist

Continue Reading

Business

FOBTOB seeks fresh dialogue over ban on alcohol in sachets and PET bottles

Therefore, while NAFDAC states that factories will not be shut down, the policy will result in economic shutdown, particularly for indigenous manufacturers and informal-sector participants.

Published

on

By

55 Views

Food, Beverages and Tobacco Senior Staff Association (FOBTOB) said on Thursday that the NAFDAC’s blanket ban on satchets alcohol is economically destructive.

FOBTOB, there call out for a fresh dialogue comprising the stakeholders in the industry, the National Assembly, the Federal Ministry of Health, NAFDAC and Civil society organizations to engage in open, transparent, and evidence-based dialogue aimed at crafting policies that protect public health without destroying livelihoods or creating regulatory contradictions.

Reacting to a press release issued by the Director-General of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) today regarding the enforcement of a ban on alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets and small containers below 200ml, FOBTOB President, Jimoh Oyibo, disclosed that while the association acknowledge and fully supports the shared objective of protecting children, adolescents, and vulnerable populations from the harmful use of alcohol

“We must express deep concern that the approach adopted by NAFDAC is disproportionate, economically disruptive, and inconsistent with broader regulatory and public health realities in Nigeria,” he said.

PUBLIC HEALTH IS IMPORTANT — BUT POLICY MUST BE BALANCED AND EVIDENCE-BASED

No reasonable stakeholder disputes that excessive alcohol consumption is harmful.

However, public health challenges require holistic, data-driven, and enforceable solutions, not blanket prohibitions that fail to address root causes.

Alcohol abuse among minors is primarily a challenge of effective enforcement, parental responsibility, public education, and social regulation, rather than one of packaging format.

The size of an alcohol container does not in itself, confer safety, nor does increasing pack sizes prevent access by minors.

The global public health evidence consistently demonstrates that behavioural regulation, age-restriction enforcement, education-driven interventions, and appropriate sanctions are more effective in addressing underage alcohol consumption than blanket product bans.

NAFDAC’S CLAIM ON UNINTERRUPTED COMPANY OPERATIONS – CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE

Notwithstanding representations made by affected stakeholders, access to these depots has not been restored by NAFDAC, and this is affecting normal business operations negatively.

As a labour union, the livelihoods of our members will be adversely affected by the closure of manufacturers’ depots.

We have compiled records of these enforcement actions for reference and ongoing engagement, which are presented alongside this article.

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES CANNOT BE IGNORED

For many indigenous distillers, blenders, and distributors, sachet and sub-200ml packaging does not constitute a marginal segment of their operations but rather is the foundation of the core business model.

These packaging formats were intentionally developed to serve low-income consumers, informal retail channels, and rural markets where considerations such as affordability, portability, and unit pricing determine demand.

Also, the claim that the policy only affects “two packages” does not fully convey the magnitude of the impact.

In operational terms:

Production lines are configured specifically for sachet and small-format bottling.

Distribution networks are optimized for high-volume, low-unit sales

Retail reach is largely dependent on maintaining affordability at the lowest price points.

For many small and medium-scale operators, this transition will not be financially attainable.

Therefore, while NAFDAC states that factories will not be shut down, the policy will result in economic shutdown, particularly for indigenous manufacturers and informal-sector participants.

The ban on sachets and small containers below 200ml also risks tilting the market in favour of larger, better-capitalized multinational players who can absorb retooling costs and pivot to premium pack sizes.

Smaller local producers, who rely overwhelmingly on sachet sales, are disproportionately harmed, raising concerns about market concentration and unfair competitive outcomes.

Public health and economic survival are not mutually exclusive.

Nigeria deserves policies that are balanced, humane, enforceable, and fair.

The solution lies in moderation, education, and enforcement, not in policies that punish many while failing to address the real drivers of abuse.

SIGNED BYJIMOH OYIBONATIONAL PRESIDENT FOOD, BEVERAGE AND TOBACCO SENIOR STAFF ASSOCIATION (FOBTOB

Continue Reading

Trending