Opinions
Propaganda Journalism: Are Image Makers To Blame or The Board ?
By Ichaburu Ochefa
Image credit: The Hoot
“Our refinery not 90% completed – BUA
The management of BUA Refinery and Petrochemicals has denied reports its refinery is 90 percent completed.” (Daily Trust)
“CBN Dismisses Forced Exit Claims, Says 1,000 Staff Exited Voluntary with Full Benefits” (Arise News)
“FCCPC denies claims of halting investigations into Air Peace, other sectors” (The Nation)
” Port Harcourt Refinery begins operation, says NNPC (Premium Times)
“NNPC Ltd Delivers on Refinery Revamp Promise: Warri Plant Resumes Operation with 125,000bpd Capacity in Warri, Delta State.” (Dec 30, Reuters)
Looking at the above headlines clips, what do they have in common?
Managements discredited news reports that emanated from the organizations. Either from the corporate affairs departments duly signed by the company’s image maker or a member of the board of directors of the company.
Also, the information may have been gotten by the reporter or Editor, through an insider ( the CEO himself, a director, driver, cleaner, PRO, etc) in the company.
He hurries to write the story and breaks it as an “exclusive or a scoop”, on his media platform.
However, to promote or project an organization’s image in a positive light to the government, the shareholders, and other stakeholders, some company’s media departments have employed what we call “agitprop” or propaganda journalism, which is coloring falsehood, lies, and misinformation, to look like truth.
It is a powerful tool or weapon to move the crowd to believe what is fake is real and things like that.
Just to sway or pull the crowd to accept that viewpoint.
Advertisers use it often in the marketing of products and services.
Maybe you are familiar with clichés such as these:
“Use this cream and you will look glamorous.”
“Use this toothpaste and…”
“Everybody is drinking this water…” Propaganda journalism or messages are destructive.
It is like you lied to me before, how can I trust you again?
Again, some news sources or makers even employ what is called synecdoche, a figure of speech in English -Literature.
Synecdoche means when you use a part to represent a whole, or a whole for the part.
Therefore, organizations and their image makers had better ensure that the information they are sending out for public consumption is crafted in such a manner that what is written is what is understood, and what is understood is what is meant
That’s what may have played out in the reportage of the NNPCL refineries in Port Harcourt and the Warri Refinery and Petrochemicals.
The NNPCL, in its press releases, made the public believe that they had started working, whereas it was a section of the refineries.
Media reports had it that in November and December 2024, respectively, the NNPCL announced the revamping of the refineries, even if partially, with Port Harcourt at 70 percent level functionality, while the Warri refinery is currently operating at 60 percent.
The announcements led to the government rejoicing, a well-done and for the good works to the NNPCL management, and an encouragement by Mr President to the Corporation’s head to finish the Kaduna refinery and the New Port Harcourt Refinery, too.
However, the praises were soon cut shut, following the outpourings of doubts about the Workability of the refineries.
The doubters include oil, some people in the oil and gas industry, petroleum engineers, as well as Nigeria’s elder statesman, former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
SweetcrudeReports, recently reported: ” Experts, stakeholders and inside sources at the Port Harcourt Refinery are faulting the recent Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPC, claims on the return of the 60,000 barrels per day old Port Harcourt refinery to operations.
They described the claims as amounting to national deceit. Investigations at the refinery showed that the plant currently refines only 6,500 barrels of crude oil some days (not even daily), which can only load 10 trucks. Industry experts say this is insignificant when compared to the refinery’s 60,000 barrels per day refining capacity and its loading capacity of 180 to 200 trucks daily.
According to the experts, a refinery of 60,000 per day capacity that is processing only 6,500 barrels cannot be described as working. “As it stands now, it is only the CDU (Crude Distillation Unit) that refines just 6,500 barrels per day and produces nothing more than 10 trucks maximum per day that is working, ”Alex Ogedegbe, a chemical engineer, expert refiner and former Managing Director of the Port Harcourt Refinery and the Warri Refinery, told SweetcrudeReports.
He added: “It is not the full refinery that is functioning. No refiner can claim that with only one unit running, and for that, the Port Harcourt refinery has begun operations and thus issues fake figures to Nigerians.
President Olusegun Obasanjo also expressed reservations over the workability of the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries.
Obasanjo who spoke recently on a national television, likened the declaration by the NNPC that the crude oil refining facilities are now working to a farmer who lied about the volume of his crops during the planting season, insisting that the truth will always be revealed during the harvest season.
“So if anybody tells you now that they (the refineries ) are working, why are they not with Aliko (in the market)? And Aliko will make his refinery work. Not only make it work, he will make it deliver.
“Whether we announce our government refineries are working or not working, look, it is like they say in Yoruba adage, ‘the man who plants 100 heaps of yams and says he has planted 200 heaps, they say after he has harvested 100 heaps of yam, he will also harvest 100 heaps of lies,” he said in response to a question on the oil assets.
What is the point?
Therefore, organizations and their image makers had better ensure that the information they are sending out for public consumption is crafted in such a manner that what is written is what is understood, and what is understood is what is meant; otherwise, the receivers will read different meaning or give a different interpretation to the information.
In the words of Anuk Kumar, any news that does not contain facts and shades of opinion that allow readers to draw their own meaning is inadvertent propaganda.
▪︎Ichaburu Ochefa, a media professional and communicator, wrote this piece in Lagos.
Opinions
Am I A Thief?
Sometimes, we think being a thief is only about taking what is not ours in obvious ways.
One of our Sudanese brothers once shared a deeply touching story titled “Am I a Thief?”—and honestly, it’s not just a story… it’s a mirror to the soul.
He spoke of two moments that seemed small on the surface, yet carried profound weight.
He had traveled to Ireland for a medical exam. The fee was £309, but without change, he paid £310. It felt insignificant—just £1 extra. He completed his exams and eventually returned to Sudan, probably never thinking about it again.
But then… a letter arrived.
Inside was a check for £1, with a message that pierced deeper than the money itself:
“You made a mistake when paying your exam fees. The fee was £309, but you paid £310. This is your £1… we do not take more than what is rightfully ours.”
Pause for a moment and let that sink in…
The envelope, the stamp, the process—it all costs more than £1. Yet, integrity was not measured by cost, but by principle.
It wasn’t about the money. It was about doing what is right… even when no one is watching, even when it doesn’t “make sense.”
The second moment:
On his daily route between college and home, he would stop by a small grocery shop run by a woman and buy chocolate for 18 pence.
One day, he noticed something different. The same chocolate—same size, same quality—but now there were two prices: 18 pence and 20 pence.
Curious, he asked why.
She calmly explained:
“There were issues in Nigeria, where we get cocoa. Prices have gone up. The new stock is 20 pence, but the old one remains 18.”
He thought logically, like many of us would:
“Then people will only buy the 18 until it finishes, before moving to 20.”
She nodded, “Yes, I know.”
So he suggested what seemed like a “smart” solution:
“Why not mix them together and sell everything at 20? No one will know the difference.”
She leaned closer… lowered her voice… and asked a question that struck like lightning:
“Are you a thief??”
He was stunned. Speechless.
He walked away—but that question followed him… echoed within him… refused to let him go:
“Am I a thief??!!”
Sometimes, we think being a thief is only about taking what is not ours in obvious ways.
But this story challenges something deeper.
It asks:
What do we do with the little things?
The unnoticed moments?
The quiet opportunities to bend the truth… just a little?
Because integrity is not proven in grand gestures.
It is revealed in the smallest decisions—when profit is possible, when shortcuts are easy, when no one would ever know.
And perhaps the real question is not what others call us…but what our conscience whispers when we are alone.
Opinions
Democracy Still Struggling 33 Years After June 12, PDP Laments by Comrade Ini Ememobong
As Nigerians commemorate Democracy Day, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has declared that three decades after the historic June 12, 1993 presidential election, democracy remains under severe threat in the country.
In a strongly worded press statement issued on Thursday, the PDP paid tribute to the freest and fairest election in Nigeria’s history and the sacrifices made by citizens who defended the people’s mandate.

The party recalled the remarkable enthusiasm displayed by Nigerians during the 1993 polls, when citizens transcended ethnic and religious fault lines to vote for national progress.
The statement, signed by Comrade Ini Ememobong, National Publicity Secretary of the PDP Interim National Working Committee, noted that undemocratic forces aborted the popular will, triggering a prolonged resistance that claimed many lives.
“Thirty-three years later, the lessons of June 12 ring out more resoundingly than ever,” the PDP said, urging the Federal Government to uphold democratic principles, guarantee civil rights including the right to peaceful assembly and protest, and protect the rights of the opposition.
The party also reminded the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of its sacred duty to conduct elections with “transparent impartiality and unimpeachable fairness,” describing these as minimum standards rather than mere aspirations.
However, the PDP expressed deep disappointment over what it described as the current administration’s failure to learn from history.
“Reality check, however, provides damning evidence that under this APC-led Federal Government, the lessons of June 12 remain painfully unlearnt,” the statement read. “Today, of all days — a day set aside to honour the blood of democratic martyrs — peaceful protesters were teargassed and assaulted in Abuja.”
The party highlighted the case of activist Omoleye Sowore, who was reportedly injured and hospitalised while demanding the immediate release of schoolchildren and teachers held hostage in different parts of the country.
The PDP accused the Tinubu administration of prioritising “optics over action, propaganda over policy,” and living in “a dangerous utopian self-delusion,” thereby reducing Democracy Day to a mere historic remembrance instead of a celebration of democratic consolidation.
Looking ahead to the 2027 general elections, the opposition party called on all citizens to remain vigilant and unrelenting in their demand for genuine democratic consolidation.
“The sacrifices of the past must not be reduced to ceremonial memory. They must be active warnings that this country must never again travel the path of state-engineered anti-democratic actions,” the PDP warned.
Comrade Ini Ememobong, mnipr is the National Publicity Secretary, Interim National Working Committee of the Peoples Democratic Party.
Opinions
Nigeria Cannot Build Flood Resilience While Destroying Its Wetlands
The next 10 to 20 years are likely to bring even more dangerous combinations of intense rainfall, river flooding, urban flooding, and coastal flooding/erosion.
By DrJoseph Onoja
Every rainy season in Nigeria now arrives with a familiar sense of anxiety. Roads disappear beneath floodwaters, homes are submerged, businesses are disrupted, and lives are displaced.
What was once considered a seasonal inconvenience has become a recurring national emergency.
But Nigeria’s flooding crisis is no longer simply about rain.It is the result of a dangerous collision between climate change, environmental degradation, and weak urban planning.
Climate change is intensifying rainfall patterns across Africa, but human activities like deforestation, wetland destruction, poor drainage systems, and uncontrolled development on floodplains are multiplying the scale of destruction.
The uncomfortable truth is this: flooding in Nigeria is becoming structural.
Climate change may trigger the rainfall, but environmental degradation determines whether rain becomes disaster.
Climate Change Is Intensifying the Risk
Scientific evidence continues to show that extreme rainfall events are becoming more intense across Africa.
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), both the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events are projected to increase as global warming accelerates.
In cities like Lagos, the impacts are already visible. Urban flooding has become more widespread, with both short-duration high-intensity rainfall and prolonged rainfall events increasing flood risks.
However, climate change alone does not explain the scale of devastation we are witnessing.
Ordinarily, heavy rainfall should not automatically become a disaster.
Healthy wetlands, functional drainage systems, protected floodplains, and well-planned urban infrastructure are designed to absorb and manage excess water.
” In Lagos, this issue is particularly critical. Water bodies, lagoons, creeks, and wetlands cover more than 62% of the state’s land area, while another significant portion remains seasonally flood prone.”
But when these natural and engineered systems fail or are deliberately compromised, communities become increasingly vulnerable.Nigeria’s flood challenge is therefore not only a climate issue. It is also a planning and governance issue.
Nigeria Is Destroying Its Natural Flood Defences
One of the most overlooked aspects of flood resilience in Nigeria is the role of nature itself.
Forests, wetlands, mangroves, and floodplains act as natural flood buffers. They absorb excess water, slow runoff, reduce erosion, and minimize flood peaks.
In many ways, they function as invisible infrastructure protecting communities from disaster.
Yet across Nigeria, these ecosystems are being degraded at alarming rates.
Deforestation reduces the soil’s ability to absorb water, increasing surface runoff and erosion. Sediments washed into drainage systems reduce their capacity and worsen urban flooding.
At the same time, wetlands and floodplains are increasingly being sandfilled and converted for construction and urban expansion.
The irony is embedded in the name itself: floodplains exist to absorb floods.
In Lagos, this issue is particularly critical. Water bodies, lagoons, creeks, and wetlands cover more than 62% of the state’s land area, while another significant portion remains seasonally flood prone.
When these ecosystems are filled, degraded, or built over, floodwater has fewer places to disperse safely. Instead, it ends up in homes, roads, and communities.
Wetlands are not vacant land waiting for development; they are natural infrastructure protecting cities from collapse.
The implications are enormous. Sensitive ecological areas such as the Lekki Conservation Centre continue to serve as natural buffers by receiving, retaining, and absorbing water from surrounding environments.
If such ecological buffers are lost to uncontrolled development, entire communities become significantly more exposed to flooding risks with attendant consequences for human health, livelihoods, wellbeing, infrastructure, and property.
Nigeria’s Adaptation Gap Is Growing
Nigeria is not standing completely still. There are signs of progress.
The Lagos Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan identify dozens of adaptation projects and estimates financing needs between US$9 billion and US$16 billion by 2035.
This reflects increasing recognition that climate resilience must become a development priority.
But adaptation efforts are still not keeping pace with the speed of urban growth and climate risk.
Rapid urbanization, inadequate drainage systems, weak urban governance, and insufficient climate-resilient infrastructure continue to increase exposure across many Nigerian cities.
The next 10 to 20 years are likely to bring even more dangerous combinations of intense rainfall, river flooding, urban flooding, and coastal flooding/erosion.
Sea level rise will further worsen risks in low-lying coastal cities, especially Lagos.
Without urgent intervention, the economic, social, and environmental costs will continue to rise.
The cost of protecting ecosystems today is far lower than the cost of rebuilding cities tomorrow.
Nature-Based Solutions Must Become National Policy
Nigeria cannot engineer its way out of this crisis through concrete alone. Flood resilience requires a combination of infrastructure investment and ecological protection.
Nature-based solutions must become central to national and subnational climate adaptation strategies.
This means:
- • Protecting and restoring forests, wetlands, mangroves, and floodplains
• Strengthening drainage and storm water systems
• Enforcing risk-sensitive urban planning regulations
• Preventing development on ecologically sensitive areas
• Improving solid waste management to prevent blocked drainage systems
• Investing in low-carbon and climate-resilient growth pathways.
These actions are not optional environmental luxuries. They are essential investments in public safety, economic stability, and national resilience.
The future of flood resilience in Nigeria will depend as much on ecological protection as on engineering.
A Defining Choice for Nigeria
Floods are no longer isolated disasters. They are warning signs. They reveal the growing consequences of ignoring environmental limits while cities expand faster than resilience systems can keep pace.
They expose the cost of treating ecosystems as expendable rather than essential.
Nigeria still has a choice. We can continue reacting to flood disasters after they occur, or we can invest in prevention, resilience, and nature-based infrastructure before the next crisis arrives.
Protecting Forests, wetlands, restoring degraded ecosystems, and strengthening climate adaptation systems are not simply environmental priorities.
They are national development imperatives.The future resilience of Nigeria’s cities may well depend on how seriously we take them today.
• Dr Joseph Onoja , a conservation scientist, is the Director – General of the Nigerian Conservation Foundation (NCF).
-
Business3 days agoBACITI graduates pioneer set of 40 Senior Customs Officers
-
Sports3 days agoParis FC confirm Liam Rosenior as new coach
-
News3 days agoFG Launches First University Innovation POD, Targets Research-Led Industrial Growth
-
Sports3 days agoBelgium beat US 4-1 to Reach World Cup Quarter-finals
-
Sports3 days agoTeam Nigeria Athletes Commend NSC Support Ahead of Glasgow 2026 Games
-
Crime2 days agoTinubu Orders ICPC to Probe PFIPC over Fake Government Body
-
Business2 days agoJUST IN:, Naira Depreciates to N1,405/$ in Parallel Market
-
Politics2 days agoJUST IN: “I Might Not Be Alive to Contest 2027 Election” – Peter Obi
