Connect with us

Opinions

Propaganda Journalism: Are Image Makers To Blame or The Board ?

Published

on

370 Views

By Ichaburu Ochefa

Image credit: The Hoot

“Our refinery not 90% completed – BUA

The management of BUA Refinery and Petrochemicals has denied reports its refinery is 90 percent completed.” (Daily Trust)

“CBN Dismisses Forced Exit Claims, Says 1,000 Staff Exited Voluntary with Full Benefits” (Arise  News)

“FCCPC denies claims of halting investigations into Air Peace, other sectors”  (The Nation)

” Port Harcourt Refinery begins operation, says NNPC (Premium Times)

“NNPC Ltd Delivers on Refinery Revamp Promise: Warri Plant Resumes Operation with 125,000bpd Capacity in Warri, Delta State.” (Dec 30, Reuters)

Looking at the above headlines clips, what do they have in common?

Managements discredited news reports that emanated from the organizations. Either from the corporate affairs departments duly signed by the company’s image maker or a member of the board of directors of the company. 

Also, the information may have been gotten by the reporter or Editor, through an insider ( the CEO himself,  a director,  driver, cleaner, PRO, etc) in the company.

He hurries to write the story and breaks it as an  “exclusive or a scoop”,  on his media platform.

However,  to promote or project an organization’s image in a positive light to the government, the shareholders, and other stakeholders,  some company’s media departments have employed what we call “agitprop” or propaganda journalism, which is coloring falsehood, lies, and misinformation, to look like truth.

It is a powerful tool or weapon to move the crowd to believe what is fake is real and things like that.

Just to sway or pull the crowd to accept that viewpoint.

Advertisers use it often in the marketing of products and services.

Maybe you are familiar with clichés such as these:

“Use this cream and you will look glamorous.”

“Use this toothpaste and…”

“Everybody is drinking this water…” Propaganda journalism or messages are destructive.

It is like you lied to me before, how can I trust you again?

Again,  some news sources or makers even employ what is called synecdoche, a figure of speech in English -Literature.

Synecdoche means when you use a part to represent a whole, or a whole for the part.

Therefore, organizations and their image makers had better ensure that the information they are sending out for public consumption is crafted in such a manner that what is written is what is understood, and what is understood is what is meant

That’s what may have played out in the reportage of the  NNPCL refineries in Port Harcourt and the Warri Refinery and Petrochemicals. 

The NNPCL, in its press releases, made the public believe that they had started working, whereas it was a section of the refineries.

Media reports had it that in November and December 2024, respectively, the NNPCL announced the revamping of the refineries, even if partially, with Port Harcourt at 70 percent level functionality, while the Warri refinery is currently operating at 60 percent.

The announcements led to the government rejoicing, a well-done and for the good works to the NNPCL management,  and an encouragement by Mr President to the Corporation’s head to finish the Kaduna refinery and the New Port Harcourt Refinery,  too.

However,  the praises were soon cut shut, following the outpourings of doubts about the Workability of the refineries.

The doubters include oil, some people in the oil and gas industry, petroleum engineers, as well as Nigeria’s elder statesman, former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

SweetcrudeReports,  recently reported: ” Experts, stakeholders and inside sources at the Port Harcourt Refinery are faulting the recent Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPC, claims on the return of the 60,000 barrels per day old Port Harcourt refinery to operations.

They described the claims as amounting to national deceit. Investigations at the refinery showed that the plant currently refines only 6,500 barrels of crude oil some days (not even daily), which can only load 10 trucks. Industry experts say this is insignificant when compared to the refinery’s 60,000 barrels per day refining capacity and its loading capacity of 180 to 200 trucks daily.

According to the experts, a refinery of 60,000 per day capacity that is processing only 6,500 barrels cannot be described as working. “As it stands now, it is only the CDU (Crude Distillation Unit) that refines just 6,500 barrels per day and produces nothing more than 10 trucks maximum per day that is working, ”Alex Ogedegbe, a chemical engineer, expert refiner and former Managing Director of the Port Harcourt Refinery and the Warri Refinery, told SweetcrudeReports.

He added: “It is not the full refinery that is functioning. No refiner can claim that with only one unit running, and for that, the Port Harcourt refinery has begun operations and thus issues fake figures to Nigerians.

President Olusegun Obasanjo also expressed reservations over the workability of the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries.

Obasanjo who spoke recently on a national television, likened the declaration by the NNPC that the crude oil refining facilities are now working to a farmer who lied about the volume of his crops during the planting season, insisting that the truth will always be revealed during the harvest season.

“So if anybody tells you now that they (the refineries ) are working, why are they not with Aliko (in the market)? And Aliko will make his refinery work. Not only make it work, he will make it deliver.

“Whether we announce our government refineries are working or not working, look, it is like they say in Yoruba adage, ‘the man who plants 100 heaps of yams and says he has planted 200 heaps, they say after he has harvested 100 heaps of yam, he will also harvest 100 heaps of lies,” he said in response to a question on the oil assets.

What is the point?

Therefore, organizations and their image makers had better ensure that the information they are sending out for public consumption is crafted in such a manner that what is written is what is understood, and what is understood is what is meant; otherwise,  the receivers will read different meaning or give a different interpretation to the information. 

In the words of Anuk Kumar, any news that does not contain facts and shades of opinion that allow readers to draw their own meaning is inadvertent propaganda.

▪︎Ichaburu Ochefa, a media professional and communicator, wrote this piece in Lagos.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

Nigeria: Act Now Before It’s Too Late, By Emeka Monye

Each time, the Nigerian government issues statements. Each time, we summon the South African High Commissioner. Each time, we are promised investigations. And each time, the violence returns.

Published

on

By

19 Views

In the build-up to political independence from Britain, Nigeria stood as a frontline voice in African affairs.

That role positioned the nation as a leading force on the continent — so central to African liberation and diplomacy that Nigeria was widely perceived as a potential superpower in African geopolitics.And true to those expectations, Nigeria did not falter.

The country embraced its political and economic leadership role with conviction, both before and after independence in 1960.

From the corridors of the United Nations to the liberation movements of Southern Africa, Nigeria’s imprint was unmistakable.

The nation’s support for fellow African states was comprehensive.

It was economic, political, social, cultural, and educational. During the dark years of colonial rule and apartheid, Nigeria opened its treasury and its classrooms.

It offered scholarships to citizens of Ghana, Togo, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, and others.

The Nigerian government funded the Southern African Relief Fund in 1976, contributing over $5 million — a significant sum at the time — to support liberation movements. Nigerian civil servants took a pay cut to fund the anti-apartheid struggle.

Our musicians, from Sonny Okosun to Majek Fashek, became the soundtrack of African resistance. Our passports were issued to ANC leaders denied travel documents.

We were, in every sense, “Africa’s Big Brother.”Yet, tragically, these acts of solidarity have been consigned to the dustbin of history.

Many of the countries that once leaned on Nigeria’s shoulders now appear unmoved by that legacy of goodwill.

The sacrifices we made during their years of struggle and suffering are met today with silence, or worse, hostility.South Africa offers the most painful example.

A nation that was once an apartheid enclave emerged from decades of racial oppression with Nigeria as one of its staunchest allies.

Lagos was declared an ANC operational hub. Nigerian students protested on the streets for Mandela’s release.

We boycotted the 1976 Olympics and the 1978 Commonwealth Games to isolate the apartheid regime. Nigeria lost trade, investment, and diplomatic opportunities for the sake of South Africa’s freedom.

But post-apartheid South Africa has turned a blind eye to that history. Today, Nigerians in South Africa live under the shadow of xenophobia.

They are hunted in their shops, assaulted in taxi ranks, and targeted in their homes. The attacks are not random.

They are systematic, recurring, and often justified under the obnoxious narrative that foreigners — especially Nigerians — are “taking jobs,” “running drugs,” and “fueling crime.”

That a fellow African nation would institutionalize the rejection of other Africans is not just pathetic. It is a betrayal of the Pan-African ideal.This is not new.

History is replete with patterns of anti-Nigerian and anti-foreigner violence in South Africa.

We saw it in May 2008, when over 60 people were killed. We saw it again in April 2015, when shops were looted in Durban and Johannesburg.

In September 2019, another wave left at least 12 dead, with Nigerian businesses torched on live television. And now, in 2026, the cycle continues.

Each time, the Nigerian government issues statements. Each time, we summon the South African High Commissioner. Each time, we are promised investigations. And each time, the violence returns.

For too long, the Nigerian government has turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to the plight of its citizens abroad.

Our foreign policy, once rooted in Afrocentrism, has become reactive rather than proactive. We respond to crises instead of preventing them.

We preach “Africa as the centerpiece” of our diplomacy, but we have failed to define what that means in 2026. Does it mean silent diplomacy while our people are killed? Does it mean economic ties at the expense of human dignity?The cost of inaction is no longer diplomatic — it is existential.

Every Nigerian killed in Pretoria or Durban chips away at our national pride. Every looted shop weakens the confidence of our diaspora, whose remittances exceed $20 billion annually and sustain millions of families at home.

Every video of a Nigerian pleading for his life diminishes Nigeria’s standing as a regional power.

A nation that cannot protect its citizens abroad cannot command respect at home.

So what must Nigeria do?

” We need a rapid response unit within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, NiDCOM, capable of legal intervention, evacuation, and litigation within 48 hours of any attack. “

First, we must abandon the era of tepid press releases. Diplomacy without consequences is appeasement.

The government must invoke Article 3 of the 2013 Nigeria-South Africa Bi-National Commission Agreement, which commits both nations to protect each other’s citizens.

Where violations occur, there must be reciprocal measures — from visa reviews to trade sanctions.

South Africa benefits from Nigerian markets, from MTN to Shoprite. That leverage must be used.

Second, Nigeria needs a Diaspora Protection Framework with teeth.

We need a rapid response unit within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, NiDCOM, capable of legal intervention, evacuation, and litigation within 48 hours of any attack.

Our missions must move from being ceremonial offices to active defenders of Nigerian lives and property.

Third, we must re-educate Africa about Nigeria’s role. The younger generation in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and beyond has no memory of Nigeria’s sacrifices.

Our foreign policy should include cultural diplomacy — documentaries, curriculum exchanges, and memorials that institutionalize our Pan-African contributions.

If we do not tell our story, others will erase it.

Fourth, we must look inward.

The reason many Nigerians migrate is because home has failed them. Unemployment, insecurity, and poor governance push our best brains into hostile environments.

The ultimate protection for Nigerians abroad is a Nigeria that works. If we fix power, secure our streets, and create jobs, economic migration will become a choice, not a desperate escape.This is not a call for war. It is a call for self-respect.

Nigeria gave Africa its voice. We funded liberation when it was not profitable. We welcomed refugees when it was not convenient. We must now demand that the same humanity be extended to us.

The xenophobic attacks are not just South Africa’s shame. They are Nigeria’s test.

Our founding fathers envisioned a Nigeria that would be the giant of Africa not in size alone, but in moral authority.

That authority is bleeding out on the streets of Johannesburg.

History will not judge us by the speeches we made, but by the citizens we protected.

The time for quiet diplomacy is over.

The time for lamentations has passed.Nigeria must act now — before the next video, before the next body bag, before it is too late.

• Emeka Monye Is a journalist.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Money Politics And High Costs of Political Party’s Nomination Form

Nigeria deserves leaders chosen for their competence and character, not the size of their wallets.

Published

on

By

54 Views

Dr. Chiogo Constance Ikokwu (Ugonecheora).

In a piece, titled ‘ End the Paywall on Leadership: Let Competence, Not Cash, Decide Our Candidates,’ Dr. Chiogo Constance Ikokwu (Ugonecheora), an aspirant for Idemili North and South Federal Constituency for House of Representatives on African Democratic Congress (ADC) platform, called on political parties across Nigeria, to either scrap or reduce the high cost of nomination forms.

This she said, will open the door to real leadership, and help to expand access to women and people with disabilities (PWDs).

Emphasising that Nigeria’s political system cannot thrive behind a price tag, Dr Ikokwu observed that the high cost of party nomination forms has turned political participation into an exclusive club for the wealthy, shutting out capable women, young people, and PWDs before they even begin.

She argues that if leadership is truly about service, then access to contest must not be determined by bank balance, but by vision, integrity, and the courage to lead.

She said:

” Political parties, especially the African Democratic Congress (ADC) on whose platform I’m running, must take deliberate steps to eliminate or drastically reduce the cost of nomination forms. I also expect that women and PWDs are allowed to pay discounted fees, if indeed they must pay.

If we are serious about deepening democracy, then access to contest should not be reserved for the wealthy or those backed by powerful financiers,” she stated.

She continued; “Money politics has done deep damage to the quality of our representation, and the reasons are clear. It sidelines visionary candidates who have ideas, integrity, and a genuine desire to serve, but lack the financial muscle to compete.

By removing these financial, and other barriers, parties will not only expand participation but also elevate the standard of leadership.

If we are serious about deepening democracy, then access to contest should not be reserved for the wealthy or those backed by powerful financiers.

Nigeria deserves leaders chosen for their competence and character, not the size of their wallets.”

Dr. Ikokwu argued that Nigeria cannot keep saying it wants inclusive leadership while maintaining barriers that shut out capable citizens.

As a journalist turned politician, she said that she has seen firsthand how the exorbitant cost of party nomination forms discourages not just women, but also young people from even stepping forward.

These fees are not a measure of competence or commitment, they are simply a financial gatekeeping tool that narrows our democratic space, she declared. “

Continue Reading

Opinions

IWD: 50 rights female gender should enjoy

Women are individuals with talents, ambitions, and identities.

Published

on

By

164 Views

Every year on March 8, the world pauses to celebrate International Women’s Day (IWD), a global moment to reflect on women’s achievements and the ongoing fight for equality.

Meanwhile, beyond the celebrations, the real conversation centers on something deeper: women’s rights.

Tribune Online, highlights 50 key rights of the female gender, drawn from those principles and global equality frameworks, to mark International Women’s Day and remind society that equality is not a privilege but a right.

The Right to Respect

Every woman deserves respect in all aspects of her life, including society, at home, and in the workplace.

The Right to Be Free from Body Shaming

No woman should be judged or mocked because of her appearance.

The Right to Protection from Sexual Abuse

Sexual violence against women is a violation of basic human rights.

The Right to Protection from Physical Abuse

Women have the right to live without domestic or physical violence.

The Right to Emotional Safety

Psychological and emotional abuse are forms of violence that must be rejected.

The Right to Education

No girl or woman should be denied access to education.

The Right to Equal Treatment

Women should be treated equally to men in all areas of life.

The Right to Equal Pay

Women must receive the same pay as men for the same work.

Globally, the gender pay gap persists, where women are paid roughly 22% less than men on average, according to the Economic Policy Institute.

The Right to Freedom from Discrimination

Gender should never determine opportunities.

The Right to Political Participation

Women should have the opportunity to run for public office.

The Right to Own Property

Women should have the right to own land and assets.

The Right to Healthcare

Access to quality healthcare is a fundamental right.

The Right to Bodily Autonomy

A woman’s body belongs to her, no one else.

The Right to Vote

Women must participate freely in democratic processes.

The Right to Make Personal Decisions

Women should have autonomy over life choices.

The Right to Choose Marriage

No woman should be forced into marriage.

The Right to Decide Family Size

Women should determine the number of children they want.

The Right to Dress Freely

Women should not be shamed for their clothing choices.

The Right to Reproductive Freedom

Women must not be forced into abortion or sterilization.

The Right to Protest

Women have the right to peacefully advocate for their rights.

Women have the right to peacefully advocate for their rights.

The Right to Speak Out

Every woman should be able to express her views openly.

The Right to Privacy

Recording or sharing images of women without consent is unacceptable.

The Right to Protection from Drugging or Assault

Women deserve safety in social spaces.

The Right to Safety in Public and Private Spaces

Women must feel secure everywhere they go.

The Right to Be Seen Beyond Sexual Objectification

Women are individuals with talents, ambitions, and identities.

The Right to Freedom of Movement

Women should travel freely without restrictions.

The Right to Hold a Passport

Travel rights must not be denied based on gender.

The Right to Independence

Women should be encouraged to build financial independence.

The Right to Dignity After Divorce

Divorced women should not face stigma.

The Right to Respect Regardless of Marital Status

Being unmarried should never invite insult.

The Right to Protection from Rape

Sexual violence must never be tolerated

Sexual violence must never be tolerated.

The Right to Freedom from Harmful Cultural Practices

Practices like forced virginity tests must be abolished.

The Right to Freedom from Widowhood Abuse

Widows should not face degrading rituals.

The Right to Freedom from Gender Stereotypes

Women should not be confined to traditional roles.

The Right to Career Ambition

An ambitious woman should be celebrated, not criticized.

The Right to Equal Leadership Opportunities

Women should participate in leadership and decision-making.

The Right to Equal Opportunity in Employment

Career advancement should be based on merit.

The Right to Freedom from Disability Discrimination

Women with disabilities deserve equal respect.

The Right to Gender Equality Policies

Governments must reform laws that discriminate against women.

Right to Empowerment

Education, economic inclusion, and health access empower women globally.

Right to Celebration

Women’s contributions make the world better and deserve recognition.

Continue Reading

Trending