Connect with us

Politics

Drama as EFCC’s lawyer tags Yahaya Bello’s trial political

After the examination by the prosecution, the judge adjourned to tomorrow, June 27, for cross-examination by the Defendant’s Counsel.

Published

on

442 Views

Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, rejected a move by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to ‘cross-examine’ its third witness in the ongoing alleged money laundering case against the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

While delivering his ruling, Justice Nwite noted that there was no provision in the law that permits the court to allow the prosecution to re-examine its witness in the manner proposed.

This was just as the EFCC lawyer, Kemi Pinheiro, during the proceedings, described the case instituted against the former governor as a political case.

He emphasised that he was not prosecuting a bank official, but a political figure, “one who had even aspired to contest for presidency”.

He said this while arguments were being raised on whether the defence counsel would cross-examine the 4th witness when the prosecution concluded its examination at 2.30pm or wait till the next day.

The judge responded, “Political? If that is the case, then those handling political cases should prepare to take over the matter.”

On the ruling against the cross-examination of PW3 by the EFCC, the judge said, “I must agree with the learned counsel to the defendant that the prosecution can only cross-examine after it has declared the witness a hostile witness.

“The argument of the learned counsel to the prosecution is misconceived…This honourable court is not shutting the prosecution from re-examining the witness, but must restrict itself to pages 1, 14 and 15 of Exhibit 19.

“The prosecution is not allowed to re-examine the witness outside the pages prescribed.”

Nicholas Ojehomon, an internal auditor at the American International School, Abuja, had, at the last hearing, said there was no wired transfer of fees from the Kogi State Government or any of the local Governments in the state to the account of the American school.

On cross-examination, he also read out a part of a previous Federal Capital Territory High Court judgment that said there was no court order for AISA to return fees to EFCC or any judgment declaring the money as proceeds of money laundering.

After a brief re-examination, and the withdrawal of an earlier question posed to the witness, the EFCC lawyer, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, told the court that the Commission had three other witnesses for the day.

During examination, Mshelia Arhyel Bata, a compliance officer with Zenith Bank, confirmed that the certificates of identification were attached to the statements of account provided by the bank in the seven sets of documents presented, as requested.

The court, thereafter, admitted the statements of account of Kogi State Government House Administration, and six others, as exhibits.

The witness, on subpoena, educated the court on the withdrawal limits allowed for individuals, corporate organisations and government, saying that before the cashless policy, it was pegged at N10 million for government.

The prosecution then took him to the 23rd of May, 2016 on the printed documents, and pointed at a transaction under the name, Abdulsalami Hudu.

When the witness was asked to explain the transaction, he said, “It is a cash withdrawal of N10 million in accordance with the then maximum threshold allowed for cheque withdrawal per transaction.”

He, however, said that he had nine cash transactions on the same date.

The witness was then told to go to the credit transactions of 30th January, 2018, and he confirmed that there were 10 separate credits of various sums, totalling about N1.092 billion.

When asked to mention the total amount of withdrawals, the Defendant’s counsel cut in: “He (Pinheiro, SAN), knows that they are for security votes.

“The witness aggregated the total amount of withdrawals to N1.968 billion, saying they were on different dates.”

He also read out the inflow and outflow between 2nd of May 2018 and 19th May, 2018.

After the examination by the prosecution, the judge adjourned to tomorrow, June 27, for cross-examination by the Defendant’s Counsel.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Aiyedatiwa: I never declared interest in contesting again in 2028

I would like to start with just clarifying a bit of sanity as regards to this matter. Let me establish some truth so that the general public can have a better understanding of what has been and what is now.

Published

on

By

23 Views

Ondo State Governor, Lucky Aiyedatiwa, has reacted to the judgement of a Federal High Court barring him from re-contesting governorship election in 2028.

” I had never declared interest in contesting another governorship election in 2028,” Aiyedatiwa said in a live interview on Channels Television.

” The public had been misled by various narratives circulating on social media., I had not at any time indicated an intention to run in another election,” he said.

According to him, there is currently no timetable for any governorship election in the state, and he has taken no step suggesting such an ambition.

“I would like to start with just clarifying a bit of sanity as regards to this matter. Let me establish some truth so that the general public can have a better understanding of what has been and what is now.

A lot has been said on social media and there are a lot of misconceptions and opinions trying to distort the truth.

But the truth is that I have never at any time declared to anybody that I am going to contest an election. I have said this about a year ago. It is not time for any governorship election in this state.

“There is no timetable. There is no sign of any election and I have not expressed interest at any time that I am going to run for the office of the governor again because it is not yet time,” he said.

Governor Aiyedatiwa maintained that the legal battle would not distract him from focusing on governance and delivering on the promises he made to the people of Ondo State.“I don’t feel any form of distraction. I feel good and I will continue doing my work for the good people of Ondo State. I want to fulfil the promises that I made during my campaign and ensure that I deliver,” he said.

Continue Reading

Politics

Court bars Aiyedatiwa from re-contesting for third term

The court ruled that the 1999 Constitution (as amended) does not permit a president or governor to remain in office for more than eight years, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Marwa v. Nyako to support its position.

Published

on

By

38 Views

• Lucky Aiyedatiwa

AHEAD of the 2028 governorship election in Ondo State, Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa has been barred from re-contesting the seat.

Justice Adegoke of a Federal High Court sitting in Akure, delivered the judgement on Thursday, ruling that it would violate the constitutional limit of eight years in office if he re-contests in the election.

The court ruled that the 1999 Constitution (as amended) does not permit a president or governor to remain in office for more than eight years, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Marwa v. Nyako to support its position.

Aiyedatiwa first assumed office on 27 December 2023 following the death of former Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, and was later sworn in again on 24 February 2025 after he won the 16 November 2024 governorship election.

But ahead of the 2028 governorship election in the state, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Akin Egbuwalo, through his counsel, Chief Adeniyi Akintola (SAN), dragged the governor to court, seeking interpretation of Section 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution as it relates to Aiyedatiwa’s tenure.

The section, along with Section 182(3), provides that a person sworn in to complete the term of another elected official can only contest and serve one additional term.

Egbuwalo argued that since Aiyedatiwa had taken two oaths of office—first as successor to the late Governor Akeredolu and later as an elected governor—the Constitution limits him to only one additional term.

The court concluded that allowing Aiyedatiwa to contest again and potentially serve another four years would contradict the Supreme Court’s position that no president or governor can remain in office for more than eight years.

Continue Reading

Politics

Senator Waziri Tambuwal Resigns from PDP, Defects to African Democratic Congress (ADC)

Published

on

44 Views

In a significant political development ahead of the 2027 general elections, Senator Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, CFR, former Governor of Sokoto State and current Senator representing Sokoto South Senatorial District, has formally resigned from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and joined the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

Senator Tambuwal announced his resignation in a letter dated March 11, 2026, addressed to the chairman of his ward in Tambuwal/Shinfiri Ward, Tambuwal Local Government Area, Sokoto State. The resignation took immediate effect.

The former Speaker of the House of Representatives (2011–2015) cited deep reflection and extensive consultations with political associates and supporters as the basis for his decision.

He pointed to persistent internal crises, leadership disagreements, and deepening divisions within the PDP, which he said had eroded the party’s unity and sense of direction.

“Persistent internal crises, leadership disagreements, and growing divisions within the party had made it increasingly difficult for me to continue my membership,” Senator Tambuwal stated. He lamented that these conflicts had weakened the unity that once characterized the PDP.

Despite his departure, the senator expressed appreciation to the PDP for the platforms it provided throughout his career, enabling him to serve Nigeria as Speaker of the House of Representatives and as Governor of Sokoto State (during his second term).

Following the resignation, Senator Tambuwal officially joined the African Democratic Congress (ADC) along with his associates and supporters. He described the move as driven by his conviction that Nigeria requires a stronger political platform grounded in integrity, accountability, inclusiveness, and a firm commitment to national development.

“I am guided by the belief that our country needs a political vehicle that prioritizes these core values to advance democracy, justice, and national unity,” he affirmed.

The defection comes amid ongoing challenges in the PDP, including factional disputes and a series of high-profile exits in recent months.

The ADC, which has positioned itself as a credible alternative opposition force, has attracted several prominent figures in recent times as part of efforts to build a broad coalition for the 2027 polls.

Senator Tambuwal reaffirmed his unwavering dedication to serving Nigeria and upholding the principles of democracy, justice, and national cohesion.

Continue Reading

Trending