Image: Atiku , Kwankwaso, and Obi

IN Nigerian politics, timing and coalition are often more decisive than individual popularity.

As the 2027 presidential race begins to take shape, one calculation keeps recurring in political circles: the path for Peter Obi to unseat President Bola Tinubu runs through Atiku Abubakar.

2023 election

The 2023 election proved that Nigeria’s electorate is no longer locked into the old two-party rhythm.

For the first time in the Fourth Republic, three candidates ran competitive, nationwide campaigns, forcing analysts and party strategists to rethink long-held assumptions about voter behavior, regional loyalty, and the power of structure.

Heading into February 2023, most observers expected a straight contest between the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party.

Tinubu, Atiku and Obi

Bola Tinubu, former Lagos governor and APC national leader, carried the weight of the ruling party.

Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President and perennial contender, led the PDP. Then came Peter Obi.

The former Anambra governor’s defection from the PDP to the Labour Party galvanized a youth-driven movement that defied the traditional logic of ethnic and party strongholds.

What was supposed to be a two-horse race became a three-way contest, and the results reflected it.Tinubu was declared winner with 8,794,726 votes.

Atiku followed with 6,984,640 votes, winning 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory: Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Gombe, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, and Yobe.

Obi came third with 6,101,533 votes, but his spread was striking. He carried 11 states plus the FCT: Abia, Anambra, Cross River, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, Imo, Lagos, Nasarawa, and Plateau.The numbers told a clear story.

No candidate won a majority

The combined votes of the two main opposition candidates—over 13 million—exceeded Tinubu’s total by more than 4 million.

The election was split along regional, generational, and class lines, but it also revealed a fragmented opposition that could not convert its numerical advantage into victory.

Beneath the campaign rhetoric was a deeper debate about power rotation. After eight years of Muhammadu Buhari, a northerner, many within the PDP argued that the presidency should return to the South in 2023.

It was not a constitutional requirement, but a political convention that had guided candidate selection since 1999. Senior PDP figures lobbied Atiku to step aside in the interest of equity.

The argument was straightforward: if the PDP was serious about national balance, it could not field another northerner immediately after Buhari.

Decision had consequences

Atiku, who had spent decades building a national network, disagreed. He won the party’s primary in May 2022, defeating 12 aspirants including Nyesom Wike and Bukola Saraki.His decision had consequences.

It pushed key southern PDP governors and stakeholders toward neutrality or outright defection.

It also created the opening for Obi to exit the PDP and build a movement outside the traditional party structure.

In hindsight, Atiku’s insistence preserved his base in the North but split the opposition vote in the South and Middle Belt.

Obi consolidated the South-East and South-South, broke into Lagos, and made inroads in the Christian belt of the North-Central.

Fast forward to 2027

Atiku held the core North and parts of the North-West and North-East. Tinubu took the South-West and split the North-Central. Fast forward to 2027, and the arithmetic hasn’t changed.

Tinubu will run as an incumbent with the full weight of the federal government and party machinery.

Obi has retained his support base and remains the face of the urban youth and middle-class vote. Rabiu Kwankwaso, who won Kano for the NNPP in 2023, remains a factor in the North-West.

Political analysts agree that any serious challenge to Tinubu requires the opposition to close ranks.

The most discussed scenario is a Obi-Kwankwaso ticket. Combined, their 2023 votes would exceed 7.6 million, and their regional reach covers the South-East, South-South, North-West, and pockets of the North-Central. On paper, it looks like a winning coalition.But the missing piece is Atiku’s 6.9 million votes.

Atiku’s base is concentrated in the North-East, North-West, and parts of the North-Central—regions where Obi and Kwankwaso underperformed in 2023.

Two-thirds of states and the FCT

Without that bloc, an Obi-Kwankwaso ticket would struggle to cross the constitutional requirement of 25% in two-thirds of states and the FCT.

With it, the opposition could flip enough states to make the race unwinnable for the incumbent.

This is why many in the opposition coalition argue that Atiku must be willing to sacrifice a fourth presidential run for the sake of defeating the APC.

The logic is simple: his 2023 votes have nowhere else to go. If he runs again, the opposition vote splits a third time, and Tinubu wins by default. If he steps aside and backs Obi, those votes become decisive.

The problem is not mathematical; it’s political and personal. Atiku has run for president six times and remains one of the most influential figures in the PDP.

Stepping aside would mean dismantling a structure built over 30 years and accepting a role as kingmaker rather than king.There’s also the question of trust.

After the 2023 primary and the fallout over the PDP’s zoning decision, relationships between Atiku, Obi, and the G-5 governors remain strained.

Any coalition would require ironclad agreements on power-sharing, policy direction, and the sequencing of political offices.

Ideology and messaging

Then there’s the issue of ideology and messaging. Obi’s campaign was built on “structurelessness,” competence, and anti-establishment sentiment.

Atiku represents the traditional political establishment. Merging those two brands without alienating either base will be delicate.

A closer look at the 2023 results shows where the opportunity lies. In states like Kaduna, Katsina, and Sokoto, Atiku won, but Obi came a strong second in urban centers.

Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes.

APC’s grip

In Lagos, Obi beat Tinubu outright, proving that the APC’s grip is not absolute even in its stronghold.

In the FCT, Obi won, while Atiku and Tinubu split the rest.If those patterns hold, and if Atiku’s northern base moves with him, an Obi-led ticket could redraw the electoral map.

The key would be holding the South-East and South-South, expanding in the North-Central, and peeling off enough votes in the North-West to prevent a Tinubu sweep.

Kwankwaso’s role is equally critical. Kano alone delivered 1.5 million votes to the NNPP in 2023.

A three-way deal between Obi, Kwankwaso, and Atiku would cover every major voting bloc outside the South-West.

The alternative is clear from 2023. When the opposition runs divided, the incumbent wins with a plurality.

Tinubu’s 37% vote share was the lowest for a winning candidate in Nigeria’s democratic history, yet it was enough because the opposition could not agree on a common front.

For Obi, the 2027 window may be his strongest. He has name recognition, a disciplined support base, and four years to build structure.

Northern votes

But without Atiku’s northern votes, he risks repeating 2023: winning the narrative but losing the numbers. For Atiku, the choice is equally stark.

A fourth run would likely produce a third-place finish and cement his legacy as the candidate who could not unite the opposition.

Stepping aside would be politically painful, but it would give him a chance to shape the next administration and secure his place in Nigeria’s democratic history.

Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes. He holds leverage.

Whether he uses it to run again or to enable a new opposition coalition will determine whether 2027 becomes another four years of APC rule or the first real test of an alternative.

For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.

Former President Goodluck Jonathan on Friday challenged a suit filed by a lawyer, Johnmary Jideobi, seeking to restrain him from contesting 2027 presidential election.

Jonathan, through his lawyer, Chief Chris Uche, SAN, told Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja shortly after the matter was called for hearing.

Uche informed the court that a letter of conditional appearance, a notice of preliminary objection, a counter affidavit and a written address had been filed on May 5 ,praying the court to dismiss the case.

He said that they got information about the case through the media and hence, the need to file their processes urgently going by the importance of the matter which boiled down on the eligibility of the forner president to contest in the next election.

The senior lawyer said that it was unfortunate that such a suit is filed by a lawyer who should know more that this same matter had been decided by the Federal High Court up to Court of Appeal.

Earlier, counsel to the plaintiff, Ndubuisi Ukpai, informed the court that the matter was for mention but he was just being served with Jonathan’s processes.

He said that he would need more time to respond

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday adjourned indefinitely a suit filed by an African Democratic Congress (ADC) chieftain, Nafiu Bala Gombe, challenging the party’s leadership under former Senate President David Mark.

Justice Emeka Nwite adjourned the matter sine die after the plaintiff informed the court that he had applied to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for the transfer of the case to another judge.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, has triggered fresh leadership tensions within the ADC following the emergence of Mark and former Osun State governor, Rauf Aregbesola, in the party’s leadership structure.

At the resumed hearing, counsel to the plaintiff, Luka Musa Haruna, told the court that the Supreme Court had on April 30 dismissed an interlocutory appeal earlier filed by Mark against the proceedings.

He added that the apex court also set aside the Court of Appeal’s order staying proceedings in the substantive suit.

“The interlocutory appeal of the second defendant has travelled to the Supreme Court. My Lord, we are glad to inform this honourable court that on the 30th day of April 2026, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the interlocutory appeal dismissing the said appeal for lacking in merit,” he said.

Haruna, however, disclosed that the plaintiff had written a letter dated May 4, 2026, to the Chief Judge seeking reassignment of the case to another judge, urging the court to await an administrative decision on the request.

“At this juncture, we must humbly pray to your Lordship, to wait for the administrative decision of the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” he said.

The request was opposed by defence lawyers, who accused the plaintiff of attempting to frustrate the accelerated hearing earlier ordered by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court