Connect with us

News

Real Estate Investment in Nigeria by Dennis Isong

Published

on

The Nigerian real estate market represents one of Africa’s most dynamic and promising investment frontiers.

With over 200 million people and an urbanization rate exceeding 4 percent annually, the demand for residential and commercial properties continues to surge, particularly in major cities like Lagos, Abuja, and Port Harcourt.

This demographic dividend, coupled with the country’s status as Africa’s largest economy, creates compelling opportunities for real estate investors seeking both capital appreciation and rental income.

The market’s potential is further enhanced by Nigeria’s young population, with more than 60% under the age of 25.

This demographic trend is driving demand for affordable housing, student accommodation, and modern office spaces.

Additionally, the expansion of the middle class, despite economic challenges, has created a growing market for mid-range residential properties and retail spaces.

The sector’s contribution to Nigeria’s GDP has consistently grown, demonstrating its resilience and potential for sustainable returns.

Benefits of Real Estate Investment

Real estate investment in Nigeria offers numerous advantages that continue to attract both domestic and international investors.

Perhaps the most significant benefit is the potential for substantial capital appreciation.

Property values in prime locations across major Nigerian cities have historically shown impressive growth rates, often outpacing inflation.

In particular, properties in developing areas of Lagos and Abuja have recorded appreciation rates of 20-30% annually, presenting opportunities for significant wealth creation through strategic property acquisition.

The rental market also provides a steady stream of income for investors.

The persistent housing deficit, estimated at over 17 million units, ensures strong rental demand across various property segments. High-end residential properties in exclusive neighborhoods can command premium rents, while commercial properties in business districts often yield attractive returns.

The dollarization of rents in prime locations also offers a hedge against currency fluctuations, particularly beneficial for international investors. Furthermore, real estate investment serves as an effective inflation hedge in Nigeria’s sometimes volatile economic environment.

As inflation rises, property values and rental income typically adjust upward, preserving the real value of investments.

The tangible nature of real estate assets also provides security and stability compared to more volatile investment options.

Additionally, the sector offers various investment entry points, from direct property ownership to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), allowing investors to participate according to their capital capacity and risk appetite.

The dollarization of rents in prime locations also offers a hedge against currency fluctuations, particularly beneficial for international investors

Strategic Investment Considerations Success in Nigerian real estate investment requires careful consideration of several strategic factors.

Location remains paramount, with properties in established or rapidly developing areas offering the best potential for value appreciation and rental demand. Areas with improving infrastructure, proximity to business districts, or major development projects often present early-mover advantages for astute investors. The choice of property type must align with market demand and demographic trends.

Residential developments targeting the growing middle class, particularly in the form of apartments and townhouses, have shown strong market acceptance.

Similarly, purpose-built student housing near major educational institutions addresses a significant market gap.

In the commercial sector, mixed-use developments combining retail, office, and residential components have gained popularity, offering diversification benefits within a single investment.

Understanding the local real estate market dynamics is crucial for timing investments effectively.

Market cycles in different Nigerian cities can vary significantly, influenced by factors such as infrastructure development, economic activities, and government policies.

Successful investors often combine market timing with a long-term perspective, recognizing that while short-term volatility may occur, the fundamental drivers of demand remain strong.

Challenges and Risk Mitigation Despite its potential, real estate investment in Nigeria faces several significant challenges that investors must navigate carefully. One of the most prominent issues is land title documentation and property rights.

The complex land tenure system, governed by the Land Use Act of 1978, can make property acquisition procedures lengthy and complicated.

Obtaining Governor’s Consent for property transfers and ensuring clean titles requires due diligence and often professional legal assistance. Infrastructure deficits pose another significant challenge.

Many areas suffer from inadequate power supply, water access, and road networks, necessitating additional investments in private infrastructure solutions.

This can significantly impact development costs and eventual returns. However, savvy investors often turn this challenge into an opportunity by incorporating sustainable infrastructure solutions that add value to their properties.

The regulatory environment presents its own set of challenges.

Multiple layers of government oversight, changing policies, and sometimes overlapping jurisdictions can create uncertainty.

Property taxes, development permits, and building regulations vary across states and local governments, requiring thorough understanding and compliance.

Nevertheless, these challenges can be managed through proper research, engagement with local authorities, and partnership with experienced local professionals.

Financing poses a significant hurdle, with high interest rates and relatively short tenure mortgage products limiting funding options. Most Nigerian banks require substantial equity contributions and offer loans at interest rates that can significantly impact project viability.

However, innovative financing solutions are emerging, including partnerships with development finance institutions, vendor financing arrangements, and off-plan sales strategies that help manage funding challenges.

The informal nature of significant segments of the Nigerian real estate market can complicate investment decisions.

Limited availability of reliable market data, price transparency issues, and informal transaction practices make market analysis challenging.

However, this information gap also creates opportunities for investors who conduct thorough research and build strong local networks. Construction costs and quality control present ongoing challenges.

Fluctuating material costs, skilled labor shortages, and the need to import certain building components can impact project budgets and timelines. Maintaining construction quality while managing costs requires careful contractor selection and robust project management systems.

However, investors who successfully navigate these challenges often achieve premium valuations for quality developments.

Security concerns in certain regions and the general business environment risks require careful consideration in investment planning.

However, these risks can be mitigated through appropriate location selection, security measures, and insurance coverage. Many successful investors focus on areas with stable security situations and strong economic fundamentals.

Real estate investments in Nigeria presents significant opportunities for those willing to understand and navigate its unique market dynamics.

While challenges exist, they are not insurmountable and often create opportunities for well-prepared investors.

Success requires a combination of thorough market research, strong local partnerships, professional advisory support, and a long-term perspective.

As Nigeria’s economy continues to grow and urbanize, real estate investment, when approached strategically, offers the potential for substantial returns while contributing to the country’s development.

For personalized guidance and expert advice, Dennis Isong is here to help you navigate the complexities of Nigeria’s real estate market, ensuring a stress-free property acquisition process. Contact him today at +2348164741041!

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Yahaya Bello Vs EFCC: Court Adjourns Ruling and Continuation of Trials to June 26 , 27 and July 4 and 5

Published

on

By

You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the hearing of the alleged money laundering case instituted against the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling on the request by the prosecution to “cross-examine” the 3rd witness and for continuation of trial.

Justice Emeka Nwite adjourned the hearing after listening to addresses by the prosecution and defence counsels on the Prosecution’s move to initially cross-examine the witness, a position that was rejected by the Defendant’s Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN.

When the matter was called for continuation of cross-examination, the Defendant’s counsel asked the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, whether he had testified in other courts with respect to the issue of school fees paid by the Bello family to AISA, he said yes.

But the witness, an internal auditor at the American International School, Abuja, said he could not mention the exact courts.

He admitted testifying in a similar charge involving Ali Bello but added that he never said anything adversely against former Governor Yahaya Bello just as he had not said anything negative or adversely against him in the instant charge.

After Daudu SAN concluded the cross-examination of the witness, Nicholas Ojehomon, the EFCC’s lawyer, Olukayode Enitan, SAN, moved to also cross-examine the Commission’s witness on Exhibit 19.

He told the court that he was not re-examining the EFCC’s witness, but cross-examining him because the document was admitted in evidence.

“I am not re-examining him, I am cross-examining him because they brought this document,” he said.

The Defendant’s lawyer, however, drew the court’s attention to the fact that the prosecution counsel’s position was unknown to law, in line with the Evidence Act.

“If you want to cross-examine your own witness, you have to first declare him a hostile witness. You cannot cross examine him based on the document,” Daudu SAN argued. Enitan SAN added that he had the right to draw the attention of the court to some specific paragraphs in the document.

At this point, the judge asked: “Do you have any provision of the law to support this?””I will draw your lordship attention to Section 36 of the Constitution.

They sought to tender this document, we objected and the court granted their prayer. Fair hearing demands that the complainant too has the right to examine this because Section 36 of the Constitution talks of fair hearing,”

Enitan responded. “We are not saying that they cannot re-examine the witness. That is what Section 36 under the law says about fair hearing. But if it is to cross-examine him, he will have to show us the law that backs that.

“He cannot come under the guise of fair hearing to want to cross-examine the witness,” the Defendant’s lawyer maintained. The judge, at the end of the arguments, refused to allow cross-examination of the witness by the EFCC lawyer.”

Under the procedure, the witness gives evidence in chief and the defendant cross examines, then the prosecution re-examines.

“With due respect, what I will do is if you people are so skewed to continue with this, it is better to address me on this and I will take a position,” he stated.

At this point, the prosecution counsel agreed to re-examine the EFCC’s witness and the judge gave him the go-ahead.”You can re-examine him on that but not to ask questions that will show cross examination,” Justice Nwite said.

However, when the prosecution lawyer proceeded to re-examine the witness, and his questions pointed at cross-examination, as observed by Daudu SAN, the judge insisted that the parties had to address him on the specific issue.

The Defendant’s Counsel, in his address, maintained that the position was unknown to law.

“My lord, the procedure that is being sought by the prosecution by refering the witness to the document tender in Exhibit 19 and by asking him to read paragraph 1, without drawing his attention to the issue on how the document affected his evidence in chief, the question asked in cross-examination, and the ambiguity, which needs clarification, amounts to a strange and unknown procedure not covered by the Evidence Act,” he stated.

Enitan SAN, disagreed, saying that in the case of Amobi Amobi referred to by the defendant’s counsel, the Supreme Court held that the learned trial judge ought to have allowed a re-examination of Exhibit E.

He said when the defendant sought to introduce the document, the prosecution team “submitted that this document was not made by the witness and as such, he should not be allowed to speak to it under cross examination or allowed to be confronted with it.”

“Having brought it in now, during the case of the prosecution, particularly during the cross examination of PW-3, your lordship should not allow them to shut us out as that would amount to the court allowing them to blow hot and cold,” Pinheiro SAN said.

Justice Nwite thereafter adjourned to June 26, 27 and July 4 and 5 for ruling and continuation of trial.

The 3rd prosecution witness had, at the last hearing on Thursday, said there was no wired transfer of fees from the Kogi State Government or any of the local Governments in the state to the account of the American International School, Abuja.

He also read out a part of a previous Federal Capital Territory High Court judgment that said there was no court order for AISA to return fees to EFCC or any judgment declaring the money as proceeds of money laundering.

Continue Reading

News

Bill Gates to give away 99% of his wealth

“I have decided to give my money back to society much faster than I had originally planned,” Gates, 69, wrote in a statement.

Published

on

By

The Gates Foundation plans to give away $313 billion over the next 20 years before shutting down entirely in 2045.

The move, according to Bloomberg, marks a new deadline for one of history’s largest and most influential charities.

That target would represent a doubling in spending for the non-profit foundation which has disbursed more than $100 billion since it was co-founded by Microsoft Founder Bill Gates and Melinda Gates in 2000.

Originally, the foundation was set to close 20 years after Gate’s death.

“I have decided to give my money back to society much faster than I had originally planned,” Gates, 69, wrote in a statement.

“I will give away virtually all my wealth through the Gates Foundation over the next 20 years to the cause of saving and improving lives around the world,” he added.

Credit: Bloomberg

Continue Reading

News

Peter Obi’s Comparison of Nigeria’s Educational System With Bangladesh, Turkiye

Bangladesh, which once lagged behind Nigeria in virtually every measurable development index, now surpasses us in all key areas of development and in the Human Development Index (HDI).

Published

on

By

Peter Obi wrote on his X( Twitter) : “I just came across the official results from JAMB showing the recent exam figures.

In the data shared by JAMB, a total of 1,955,069 candidates sat for the exam.

Shockingly, out of this number, only about 420,000 candidates scored above 200, while over 1.5 million scored below 200.

This means that over 78% of the total candidates failed to meet the 200-mark threshold — a reflection of the deep-rooted challenges in our educational system.

The latest JAMB results once again highlight the consequences of decades of underinvestment in education, a sector that should be central to our national development strategy.

Currently, Nigeria’s total university enrollment stands at approximately 2 million students.

By comparison, the National University of Bangladesh — a single university — has over 3.4 million students enrolled, despite the country having only about 75% of Nigeria’s population.

One university in Bangladesh surpasses the entire university enrollment in Nigeria.

Bangladesh, which once lagged behind Nigeria in virtually every measurable development index, now surpasses us in all key areas of development and in the Human Development Index (HDI).

Similarly, Turkey (now Turkiye), with a population of about 87.7 million people, has over 7 million university students — more than three times Nigeria’s total university enrollment.

I have consistently said it: education is not just a social service; it is a strategic investment.

It is the most critical driver of national development and the most powerful tool for lifting people out of poverty.

We must now invest aggressively in education — at all levels — if we are serious about building a prosperous, secure, and equitable Nigeria.”

Continue Reading

Trending