Connect with us

News

Ondo crisis: Edwin Clark writes Tinubu, makes demands [Full text]

Published

on

Elder statesman, Chief Edwin Clark has written an open letter to President Bola Tinubu over the leadership crisis rocking Ondo State.

He is asking President Tinubu to invoke the “Doctrine of Necessity” for a resolution of the crisis.

Recall that the state has been battling a political crisis for months after the Governor, Rotimi Akeredolu came back from a medical trip.

The governor, since returning to Nigeria, has been in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, from where he governs Ondo.

His absence has thrown the state into a political quagmire, with many, especially the opposition questioning his state of health.

But to resolve the impasse, Clark asked Tinubu to follow the same solution used at the national level when ex-President Musa Yar’Adua was away for treatment.

His letter reads in full:

Open letter to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to adopt the Gen. Yakubu Gowon’s Eminent Persons Committee Suggestion on Doctrine of Necessity to resolve the unfortunate crisis in Ondo State as the President of the country and leader of the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress, APC.

Dear Mr. President,
Urgent need to resolve the Ondo State impasse.

I wish to recall that during the time, the nation was almost grinding to a halt because there was no one administratively in charge of the affairs of the country.

Various groups such as the Save Nigeria Group, led by Pastor Tunde Bakare and Nobel Laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka, socio-cultural organisations, ethnic organisations including some northern groups, the South-Western group led by Bishop Emmanuel Gbonigi, the Ohaneze Ndi-Igbo, etc, rose up to protest in Lagos and Abuja. It was as though the nation was rudderless.

It was at this stage that former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon, rose up to the occasion when he summoned a meeting of some persons comprising late President Shehu Shagari, late Interim Head of State, Ernest Shonekan, late Dr. Alex Ekwueme, one time Vice President of the country, three former Chief Justices of Nigeria namely Alfa Belgore, Mohammed Uwais and Idris Legbo Kutigi. Others included Lt. Gen. T. Y. Danjuma, rtd, late Mallam Adamu Ciroma, late Alhaji Ahmed Joda, late Chief Solomon Lar and myself. Prof. Jerry Gana and Senator Jonathan Zwingina served as Secretaries The meeting was held at the ECOWAS Secretariat in Abuja. This group became known as the Eminent persons Group.

At the meeting, Justice Alfa Belgore came up with the idea of Doctrine of Necessity in order to solve the constitutional logjam the nation was facing. He explained to the group what the doctrine means, and we wholeheartedly accepted it as the only panacea to the problem. General Yakubu Gowon then delegated a committee of 5 persons led by late President Shehu Shagari because he had an international assignment to attend to outside the country. The delegation submitted the letter containing the suggestion to the NASS and the then Vice President.

The Senate under the leadership of David Mark, as Senate President acted on the suggestion of the eminent persons group and declared Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, Acting President under the Doctrine of Necessity on 9th February, 2010. The House of Representatives followed suit by also adopting the Doctrine of Necessity. On 10th February, 2010, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan was declared Acting President.

At this time, our dear President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua was still in Saudi Arabia receiving medical treatment. On 24th February, 2010, President Yar’Adua was brought back to the country under the cover of darkness, still very ill, and taken to the Villa, unknown to the Acting President. However, while President Yar’Adua was at the Villa “recuperating”, Dr. Jonathan continued to act as the President of the country. Unfortunately, President Yar’Adua could not make it. He died on 5th May, 2010. On 6th May, 2010, Dr. Jonathan was sworn in as President and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, Federal Republic of Nigeria, in accordance with constitutional provisions.

Today, we are again faced with a Constitutional debacle. First of all, I wish to thank Mr. President for your intervention into the Ondo State crisis, both as President of the country and as leader of your political party, the APC, in the manner you handled the matter. Your Excellency attempted to be fair and just to all parties concerned, viz, the Legislature, the executive, and the entire Ondo people, when at the end of the marathon meeting you held with them, and where everybody bared their mind, you directed that:
All parties should work together;

That the ailing Governor of the State, Oluwarotimi Akeredolu should remain in office, while the Deputy Governor, Lucky Aiyedatiwa, retaining his position, should preside over the executive;

That status quo should remain and no member of the Executive should be sacked

That the Deputy Governor should withdraw his case against the Speaker and the members of the State House of Assembly;

That the Legislative arm should also abandon their decision to impeach the Deputy Governor, and should also withdraw all actions they previously took to counter the Deputy Governor’s action in the State capital Akure.

However, what is confusing to some of us, is how the Speaker of the House of Assembly told his members that the Deputy Governor is to sign an unwritten resignation letter, without stating what should give rise or what gave rise to that action. And whether the Speaker has the powers to direct such resignation.

Mr. President, I think there is a need to act fast because we have seen that despite your good intentions, the crisis is brewing much tension rather than abating. There is a growing agitation for and against each of the parties. I listened to the argument of Barrister Kayode Ajulo, SAN, saying that whatever action that took place at the Villa was unconstitutional and that there was enough provision in the Constitution to resolve the crisis.

He went further to talk about the inability of Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, whom he described as his friend, to perform his duties as Governor of the State whilst recuperating in his personal house in Ibadan, Oyo State. He went further to state that the signature on the memo allegedly sent by Governor Akeredolu was forged, as he said he is very conversant with the Governor’s signature. He in fact suggested that the signature should be subjected to a forensic examination.

I also read on page 6 of Saturday 6th December 2023, Vanguard Newspaper, a report written by the Ondo State Commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources to the Deputy Governor of the State titled “Forgery of Mr. Governor’s Signature on official document”, stating that the Governor Akeredolu’s signature on the document is forged.

He said “I write to bring to your attention a critical matter that requires immediate action. It has been confirmed that the signature of Mr. Governor on a certain document has been forged.

“The irregularities in the signature were first observed when a file from my ministry was returned through the office of the Secretary to the State Government (SSG). This is the only file that has been returned so far out of the five files that were sent for Mr. Governor’s approval about two months ago.”

But the Ondo state Commissioner for Information and Orientation, Mrs. Bamidele Ademola-Olateju, featuring on the Arise television, debunked Barr. Kayode Ajulo, SAN’s claims. She said the Governor’s signature was not forged. She said “Nobody forges the signature of Mr. Governor. As of today, we have to work for the progress of the state. Those mischief makers should desist from doing so”.

The State Attorney General, Mr. Charles Titiloye, speaking in the Punch Newspaper of 5th December, 2023, also stated that the Governor’s signature was not forged, describing the “claims as baseless”.

Like I stated earlier, this matter is building up tension. It is, therefore, my opinion that Mr. President, as leader of his ruling APC, political party, may want to amend his earlier terms of settlement. And since there is no constitutional provision for such quagmire, because under Section 5 (2) of the Constitution, the State Governments are autonomous and are not subsidiaries of the central government. They are fully in-charge of their State. It is only National Assembly that is empowered to do so under Chapter 1, Part 2, Section 4 Legislative Power which states that:

2. The National Assembly shall have power to make laws for the peace, order and good government of the Federation or any part thereof with respect to any matter included in the Exclusive Legislative List set out in Part 1 of the Second Schedule to this Constitution.

3. The power of the National Assembly to make laws for the peace, order and good government of the Federation with respect to any matter included in the Exclusive List shall, save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, be to the exclusion of the Houses of Assembly.

Let me add that beyond any constitutional provision and your leadership of your political party, the APC, it is Your Excellency’s moral obligation as father of the country to use your good office to intervene and resolve all manners of political crisis around the country.

The action of the Ondo State House of Assembly by going to court to prevent the National Assembly from interfering in the matters of the State House of Assembly is also escalating the issues.

Every facet of Ondo State is currently sharply divided; the executive and legislative arms all have people either supporting the Governor or the Deputy Governor.

Finally, Mr. President, I wish to state that we have enough insecurity in the country which has largely stretched our security forces. This is why you must urgently and firmly act in the current situation in Ondo State, under a doctrine of necessity. And if I may add, also in Rivers State, for which I will be addressing a separate letter to you in the next few days.

I will continue to pray for your well being and success.

News

BREAKING: Pope Francis dies at 88

Published

on

Pope Francis has died at the age of 88.

The Vatican confirmed that the pontiff passed away on Easter Monday at his residence in the Casa Santa Marta within Vatican City.

Camerlengo of the Apostolic Chamber, Cardinal Kevin Farrell, announced the death of Pope Francis from the Casa Santa Marta on Monday morning.

Farrel said the Pope died at exactly 7.35am.

His death comes hours after he greeted Catholic faithful who were at the Vatican on Sunday for the Easter mass.

The announcement by Cardinal Farrel read, “Dearest brothers and sisters, with deep sorrow, I must announce the death of our Holy Father Francis.

“At 7:35 this morning, the Bishop of Rome, Francis, returned to the house of the Father.

“His entire life was dedicated to the service of the Lord and of His Church. He taught us to live the values of the Gospel with fidelity, courage, and universal love, especially in favour of the poorest and most marginalised.

“With immense gratitude for his example as a true disciple of the Lord Jesus, we commend the soul of Pope Francis to the infinite merciful love of the One and Triune God.

”It would be recalled that Pope has been undergoing recovery after he was discharged from the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic Hospital.

After 38 days in hospital, the late Pope returned to his Vatican residence at the Casa Santa Marta to continue his recovery.

The Pope was admitted on Friday, February 14, 2025, after suffering from a bout of bronchitis for several days.

Pope Francis’ clinical situation gradually worsened, and his doctors diagnosed bilateral pneumonia on Tuesday, February 18.

In 1957, in his early 20s, Jorge Mario Bergoglio underwent surgery in his native Argentina to remove a portion of his lung that had been affected by a severe respiratory infection.

As he aged, Pope Francis frequently suffered bouts of respiratory illnesses, even cancelling a planned visit to the United Arab Emirates in November 2023 due to influenza and lung inflammation.

In April 2024, the late Pope Francis approved an updated edition of the liturgical book for papal funeral rites, which will guide the funeral Mass, which has yet to be announced.

The second edition of the Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis introduces several new elements, including how the Pope’s mortal remains are to be handled after death.

The ascertainment of death takes place in the chapel, rather than in the room where he died, and his body is immediately placed inside the coffin.

According to Archbishop Diego Ravelli, Master of Apostolic Ceremonies, the late Pope Francis had requested that the funeral rites be simplified and focused on expressing the faith of the Church in the Risen Body of Christ.

“The renewed rite,” said Archbishop Ravelli, “seeks to emphasise even more that the funeral of the Roman Pontiff is that of a pastor and disciple of Christ and not of a powerful person of this world.”

Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Senate shifts resumption to May 6

Published

on

The leadership of the 10th Senate has announced a shift in the date of its resumption.

The earlier date for resumption was fixed for April 29, 2025.

However, the new date has been adjusted to May 6.

The announcement was contained in an internal memo dated April 20, 2025, addressed to all senators and signed by the Senate Clerk, Andrew Ogbonna Nwoba.

The postponement was hinged on the International Workers’ Day public holiday, which is celebrated on May 1 and for the lawmakers to take their time to attend to key constituency engagements.

The circular reads, “Distinguished Senators, I am directed to inform you that the resumption of plenary sittings of the Senate, earlier scheduled for Monday, 29th April 2025, has been rescheduled to Tuesday, 6th May 2025.

“This postponement is made to allow Distinguished Senators to stay with their constituents during the International Workers’ Day public holiday in the first week of May and to further enhance constituency engagements.

“Distinguished Senators are kindly requested to take note of this postponement while regretting any inconvenience the change might have caused.”

Recall that the Senate had on March 27 adjourned the plenary to allow lawmakers to observe the Easter and Eid-El-Fitr holidays.

Continue Reading

News

Judgment analysis: Report me to LPDC, Falana dares Wike

Published

on

Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, has dared the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, to report him to the Legal Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee over his (Falana’s) analysis of the Supreme Court judgment on the Rivers State politucal crisis.

Falana, in a statement on Sunday, titled “I Did Not Lie Against the Supreme Court of Nigeria,” accused Wike of trying in vain to incite the Supreme Court against him.

The SAN said contrary to Wike’s claim, he did not lie or misrepresent the Supreme Court’s decision concerning the defection of 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

Falana dismissed Wike’s claims as “spurious and tendentious in every material particular,” accusing the minister of attempting to incite the apex court against him.

Wike had publicly criticised Falana during a press conference in Abuja, asserting that the senior lawyer misrepresented the Supreme Court’s ruling on Channels TV.

Wike said, “If someone of Femi Falana’s calibre can go on national television and lie, it’s very serious. Lies can cause a lot of crises.

”In response, Falana explained, “Mr. Wike subjected me to another scurrilous attack in a press conference, where he alleged that I lied about the defection status of certain legislators during my appearance on Channels TV.”

He added that the issue of the lawmakers’ defection was still pending before the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt when the Supreme Court made its ruling.

Falana clarified, “I did not lie against the Supreme Court in respect of the judgment in question.

All I said was that the matter of the defection of the 27 legislators was raised suo motu and determined by the eminent Justices of the apex court.

”He further asserted that there were video tapes and a sworn affidavit in which the lawmakers confirmed their defection from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressives Congress.

Falana emphasised that his right to criticise court judgments is protected by both the Nigerian Constitution and international human rights law.

“My fundamental right to criticise the decisions of courts is guaranteed by Section 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights,” he said.

The SAN accused Wike of hypocrisy, pointing out that the minister has a history of attacking judges when rulings do not align with his political views.

Falana added, “Unlike Mr. Wike, who calls judges names whenever they disagree with his politics of opportunism, I have always criticised the judgments of domestic and regional courts with utmost decorum and in good faith.”

He referenced a famous statement by the late Justice Oputa in the Adegoke Motors Limited v. Dr. Babatunde Adesanya case: “We are final not because we are infallible; rather, we are infallible because we are final,” highlighting the judiciary’s openness to criticism.

Falana also quoted former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, who once said, “You have the responsibility of drawing our attention to where things are going wrong or on the verge of going wrong.

”Falana challenged Wike to take legal action if he believed Falana had breached professional conduct.

“Since he has become the unsolicited defender of the judiciary, I challenge him to report me to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee for professional misconduct,” Falana said.

On the issue of legislative defection, Falana warned that the Supreme Court’s recent stance—requiring proof of defection through a party’s membership register—could embolden “unpatriotic politicians to justify political prostitution in Nigeria.

”He urged the court to adhere to its earlier rulings, such as in Attorney-General of the Federation v. Abubakar and Abegunde v. Ondo State House of Assembly, where it ruled that legislators who defect automatically lose their seats.

Falana concluded that Wike’s attempts to discredit him had failed.

“It is indubitably clear that the allegation leveled against me by Mr. Wike is spurious… He has failed in his desperate bid to incite the Justices of the Supreme Court against me without any basis whatsoever.

”In a recent media outburst, Wike taunted Falana for losing a case he had won at the Supreme Court, dubbing him “a television lawyer.”

Falana chose not to engage with Wike’s comments at the time, stating, “Mr. Wike is the only life bencher in Nigeria who has never handled a case in any trial court or appellate court.

”Falana further added, “It is no crime if a lawyer loses a case in any court. Only a corrupt lawyer wins all cases in all courts.”

Continue Reading

Trending