Connect with us

Opinions

NUJ and the Question of Membership: Why It’s Time to Embrace Journalism Beyond the Newsrooms

In sports, Ernest Okonkwo, who never worked in a newsroom, electrified Nigerian radio with football commentary; John Motson commanded global football coverage; and Charles Anazodo, armed with an English degree but no newsroom training, became a defining voice on SuperSport Nigeria and SportZone.

Published

on

289 Views

By Babs Daramola

For decades, a quiet question has stirred in Nigeria’s media landscape: what does it truly mean to be a journalist?

Is it the newsroom, the microphone, or perhaps something in between?

This conversation spans those who honed their craft behind the scenes and those who connect with audiences on air.

As the profession evolves globally, exploring these different paths offers a fascinating glimpse into the many faces of journalism today.

The NUJ, as Nigeria’s foremost professional body for journalists, has naturally found itself at the center of this conversation.

Its membership guidelines and standards reflect a long-standing commitment to professional rigor—but they also raise interesting questions about how journalism is defined today.

Exploring the NUJ’s role offers a window into how traditional paths intersect with modern practice, and how the profession continues to recognize both experience and innovation in telling the country’s stories.

One of the most enduring points of discussion lies between those who “grew up in the newsroom” and those who made their mark on air.

Newsroom-trained journalists have long been celebrated for their investigative rigor and adherence to editorial processes, while broadcasters bring immediacy, connection, and often a deep understanding of current affairs directly to the audience.

Both paths contribute to the media landscape in meaningful ways, yet the conversation around recognition and professional legitimacy continues to spark curiosity – and sometimes controversy – within the industry.

I must admit that I too once leaned toward a narrow definition.

I argued that only those directly involved in news gathering and dissemination should rightly be called journalists.

My point, however, was not to dismiss broadcasting.

A disc jockey, an on-air personality, or a presenter of purely entertainment content is not a journalist by default.

But once a broadcaster ventures into news, current affairs, or issue-driven programming; once they engage the public in conversations that inform, interrogate power, and shape opinion, they are squarely within journalism, regardless of whether they passed through a newsroom.

As someone who has spent nearly 37 years in the profession, working in newsrooms, programme production rooms, managing broadcast outfits, and training upcoming broadcasters, I speak not as an outsider but as one deeply immersed in the craft.

Over these decades, I have seen first-hand how broadcasters and programme hosts, even those without formal newsroom training, have risen to handle current affairs with a depth and rigour that match, and sometimes surpass, their newsroom-trained colleagues.

My vantage point convinces me that the NUJ’s narrow criteria exclude valuable voices that have enriched Nigerian journalism.

History proves it: you don’t need a newsroom or a journalism degree to shape public discourse.

Larry King became a global icon with his probing interviews; Oprah Winfrey turned daytime TV into a platform for national reflection; Trevor Noah transformed comedy into incisive political analysis.

In one state, a media aide to a deputy governor was barred by the local NUJ chapter from using the title of Chief Press Secretary simply because she was not a card-carrying member of the Union

In Nigeria, Funmi Iyanda’s New Dawn fearlessly interrogated social issues, Mo Abudu’s Moments with Mo and EbonyLife TV elevated African narratives, and Ebuka Obi-Uchendu has grilled political leaders on Rubbin’ Minds with unmatched precision.

Bisi Olatilo’s multilingual presentations chronicled Nigeria’s political, social, and cultural life for decades.

In sports, Ernest Okonkwo, who never worked in a newsroom, electrified Nigerian radio with football commentary; John Motson commanded global football coverage; and Charles Anazodo, armed with an English degree but no newsroom training, became a defining voice on SuperSport Nigeria and SportZone.

None were newsroom-bred, yet all embodied journalism’s hallmarks: rigour, relevance, and undeniable public impact.

For anyone to denounce these iconic personalities as journalists is simply criminal!

The consequences of NUJ’s rigid posture are not merely theoretical.

In one state, a media aide to a deputy governor was barred by the local NUJ chapter from using the title of Chief Press Secretary simply because she was not a card-carrying member of the Union.

Her professional affiliation lay instead with the Radio, Television, Theatre and Arts Workers’ Union (RATTAWU).

She eventually settled for the title of Director of Communications. That kind of trivial gatekeeping does little to promote professionalism; instead, it hurts developmental journalism by erecting artificial barriers where none should exist.

Some defenders of the NUJ argue that its restrictive membership posture is a way of ensuring standards among practitioners. But this line of reasoning is weak and unacademic.

How does limiting membership to those with newsroom training or formal certificates guarantee professional standards?

Doctors and lawyers are licensed because their trades rest on highly technical knowledge with life-or-death consequences. Journalism is different.

It is not about certificates or regulatory seals; it is about truth-telling, verification, accountability, and informing society.

Indeed, UNESCO has consistently defined journalism not by degrees but by practice: “the activity of gathering, assessing, creating, and presenting news and information.”

The African Union’s Windhoek+30 Declaration on Information as a Public Good (2021) affirms the same spirit, urging states and institutions to recognize diverse media actors in advancing democracy.

And as Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel remind us in their influential book The Elements of Journalism, the profession is ultimately defined by enduring principles: verification, independence, and a commitment to citizens; not by a union card or a newsroom pedigree.

Across the world, professional associations in journalism tend to be more inclusive.

The U.S. Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) admits practitioners across the broad spectrum of news and current affairs, whether they are print reporters, online editors, talk-show hosts, or multimedia producers.

The UK’s National Union of Journalists (NUJ) similarly accommodates a wide variety of roles, from broadcasters to photojournalists.

Even within Africa, countries like South Africa and Kenya run relatively liberal systems where unions and associations recognize the diversity of the modern media space, instead of reducing journalism to one path. Nigeria cannot afford to lag behind.

What our own NUJ needs now is a rethink. It must broaden its tent, not narrow it. It must recognize that journalism is not a one-size-fits-all craft tied to old newsroom hierarchies.

The media landscape has expanded: citizen journalists, digital storytellers, and broadcasters who shape public discourse all fall within journalism’s wider orbit. To continue excluding them is to deny reality.

The Union has played a vital role in defending press freedom in Nigeria’s history, and it can play an even greater role in shaping the future.

But to do so, it must align itself with international best practices and with the lived realities of the profession. Journalism thrives not on exclusion but on relevance, adaptability, and fidelity to truth.

For the NUJ, the choice is clear: evolve into a forward-looking institution that embraces diversity in practice, or risk irrelevance in a world that has already moved on.

Babs Daramola is a Lagos-based broadcast journalist with nearly four decades of experience in newsrooms, programme production, management of broadcast outlets, and training of upcoming media professionals.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

Nigeria’s Democracy Under Siege: Opposition Faces Existential Threats

Thankfully, patriotic leaders saw this danger early and chose resistance over silence by rallying around the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as the nucleus of a credible national alternative.

Published

on

By

62 Views

By Paul Ibe *

For nearly three years, Nigerians have endured one of the harshest periods in recent history—an era defined by punishing economic policies and shrinking democratic space under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

True to form, this administration has not only inflicted widespread hardship but has pursued a calculated effort to eliminate political alternatives.

The objective is clear: a creeping, de facto one-party state.

Perhaps the Tinubu administration’s most disturbing “achievement” has been the systematic weakening of opposition parties, leaving the All Progressives Congress—despite its manifest failures—standing alone by default, not by merit.

Thankfully, patriotic leaders saw this danger early and chose resistance over silence by rallying around the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as the nucleus of a credible national alternative.

Predictably, agents aligned with the Presidency are now attempting to destabilize the ADC from the outside—issuing reckless prescriptions about its internal affairs, particularly the choice of a presidential candidate.

Let it be stated plainly: the ADC is on a national rescue mission. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, alongside other committed patriots, is central to this effort.

Any call—overt or covert—for Atiku to “step aside” is a gift to authoritarian ambition and a betrayal of the Nigerian people.

At present, the ADC is focused on building strong ward, local government, and state structures nationwide.

The ADC has consistently affirmed its commitment to an open, transparent, and competitive process for selecting its flag bearer.

APC proxies and external meddlers have no standing to intimidate, blackmail, or sabotage this democratic resolve.

At present, the ADC is focused on building strong ward, local government, and state structures nationwide.

Disruptors and infiltrators must allow the party to do this essential work without interference.The party remains open and welcoming to all genuine opposition figures.

This inclusiveness—not coercion—is the soul of democracy.When the time comes, all qualified aspirants will present themselves freely. No one is stepping down.

If anyone should step aside, it is President Tinubu—whose leadership has become a national liability.

The recent public declaration of ADC membership by former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi in Enugu, the political heartbeat of the Southeast, triggered open boasts by a serving minister and presidential aides about plans to undermine the party.

Their fear is evident. Let there be no ambiguity: the ADC is determined to end the misfortune imposed by the Tinubu-led APC.

No amount of intimidation, intrigue, or sabotage will derail this rescue mission. Nigeria will not surrender its democracy without a fight.

  • * Paul Ibe, Atiku Media Office Abuja , write this piece
Continue Reading

Opinions

Edo Broadcasting Service in the Dock By Michael Odigbe

Today, you hardly know that EBS is owned by the government because the broadcast station criticises it whenever it errs.

Published

on

By

47 Views

Cover image: Michael Odigbe

With the support of Governor Monday Okpebholo, including funds, moral stimulus, and freedom to operate, Aledeh has been able to transform EBS into a desired, competitive global brand.

It has been over a year since Mr Sulaiman Aledeh became the managing director of the state-owned Edo Broadcasting Service (EBS), Benin.

He met the outfit in moribund mode.

However, with the support of Governor Monday Okpebholo, including funds, moral stimulus, and freedom to operate, Aledeh has been able to transform EBS into a desired, competitive global brand.

Before the coming of Aledeh, the EBS of the Obaseki era was a mere government propaganda machine and a vicious Alsatian attack dog of opponents.

Now, a new sheriff, Aledeh, is at the helm of EBS.The old unprofessionalism of staff is gone for good.

Therefore, today, you hardly know that EBS is owned by the government because the broadcast station criticises it whenever it errs.

No more hiding place for the government’s inanities. EBS is not yet on par with the BBCs of the world, but it is steadily working hard to catch up with them.

However, the station requires a transmitter each for its Ihevbe and Ivue substations for enhanced coverage.

One of these transmitters arrived from China recently and is being installed without delay.

This suggests that a visible effort is being made to establish the necessary broadcast infrastructure for improved performance.

In addition, EBS has repackaged its programmes, providing people-friendly content with deep insights, enhanced analytical conversations, quality delivery, and an expanded time scope, thanks to the efforts of Aledeh, who has a proven record of being well-versed in a wide range of topics.

This aligns with the principles of mass communication practice worldwide.

One of the new iconic programmes of EBS is the Morning Drive, powered by a crack team of Aledeh himself, St. Patrick, Chris Enabulele, Desmond, AJ, Belema, Uju, Ofure and Mathew Ajakaiye.

Unknown to critics, the team is not a crowd but a whole house of intelligent men and women intentionally assembled for quality conversations that incorporate different perspectives.

Another key point in constituting the team is to promote the Governor Monday Okpebholo’s policy of inclusivity in governance at the micro EBS level.

For instance, with Belema, Ofure, and Uju in Morning Drive, there is female gender representation.

And by having Desmond on the programme, a person with a visible physical challenge is brought on board in Morning Drive.

So, let us stop focusing on the programme’s population and instead concentrate on the cumulative conversational value of each team member, which has been top-notch so far.Indeed, what we have in Morning Drive is not a case of ‘too many cooks spoil the broth ‘.

Instead, it is a case of a plurality of good heads being better than two or three equally good ones.

At this juncture, I must not fail to say that the deliberate inclusion of Desmond, Chris Enabulele and Mathew Ajakaiye in Morning Drive is very revealing. See, although physically challenged, Desmond is never found wanting in the knowledge content of the ideas he speaks on self-assuredly and fearlessly. Chris Enabulele!! Spinning good music is his ‘bad’ habit. But hold it. Just listen to his contributions in Morning, Drive, and you will marvel at his expansive grasp of past and current world events. Never think he is just a music machine.

Additionally, it was exciting to meet Mathew Ajakaiye on Morning Drive. He not only anchors the sports segment of the programme with an array of scintillating information and analysis, but he also stays on to provide valuable insights into any discussion on the table. He is a genuinely global person. All this narrative about Desmond, Chris Enabulele and Mathew Ajakaiye is proof positive that it is a logical fallacy to judge a book by its cover without reading it.However, I need to point out here that the programme should avoid teasing personal jokes targeted at members, as they often end up exposing confidential biographies to the public

in these days of a digital lifestyle. No one has the statutory right to openly discuss false or accurate information about a person with a veneer of a sarcastic joke.There is a plethora of jokes out there in the limitless universe that can add comfort, richness, and organic entertainment value to Morning Drive, currently the leading programme in the South-South of Nigeria, alongside Drive O’Clock, another superlative baby of EBS.Drive O’Clock, conceptualised by innovative Aledeh and operationalised by a triangular intelligent crew of Seriki, Englishman, as well as Soji Abok, is today a pioneer in Africa in impact journalism, delivered wi

h a local Nigerian energetic flavour.It is achieving its mandate of liberating the populace from the capitalist cruelty of human rights abusers.All said, my counsel is that the crew should realise that listeners and viewers of the programme have the right to criticise the presenters, even with malice.Therefore, they should not return the abuse in kind, but instead deploy hard facts, information, and education to counter the mischief of wicked critics.With Aledeh in charge at EBS, the Tuesday night reggae programme of Kingsley Ogbebor, as well as the Sunday afternoon programme of Agbakpan, and the late Sunday evening highlife programme of

Omoaka, have become more robust in terms of content, texture, and presentation style.As of now, I consider the Saturday programme, Una Good Morning Show, as a weak link in the success story of EBS. The programme is not well presented by Rev Orukpe Otubor. It is unacceptable for him to rely on Idele’s deficiencies in conversations about the programme when it is clear that Idele habitually injects personal trivialities into serious discussions on which he lacks relevant information and analytical prowess.More disappointing is that Idele often loses his attention span and struggles to stick to discussion topics, a characteristic trait that

eads him to speak out of turn. He is incorrigible, never submitting to cognitive reconditioning by Otubor, the presenter, to enable him to align with the high standards that Aledeh is setting for the new EBS.So, it is time Idele is weeded out with Aledeh’s winnowing fork so that he doesn’t do more damage to the UNA GOOD MORNING programme started long ago in 1980 by enigmatic Pa Felix Ogie.The producer of the programme needs to ensure that people like Robert Aiyanyi, Gladys Ighalo, Hope Bazuaye, and other talented individuals are recast into the programme after receiving proper education on the editorial policy of the new EBS under Aledeh

an EBS today is on the move. It is not only proper infrastructure that is needed to excel. Additionally, the broadcast station requires high-quality programmes, producers, and presenters to achieve and sustain success.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Christmas Eve Explosion: One Too Many

We commiserate with the families of those who have lost their loved ones in this senseless attack. No one should lose their life while worshipping God.

Published

on

By

94 Views


By Ini Ememobong
 

The news of an explosion in a mosque in Gamboru Market, Maiduguri is another sad reminder of the rising insecurity that has become the unfortunate contemporary reality that Nigerians face.

This is totally unacceptable; the irreducible minimum the government should offer its people is the protection of lives and property.

This administration has failed woefully in this respect and should rise to the occasion rather than resort to rhetoric and playing politics with security.
 
We commiserate with the families of those who have lost their loved ones in this senseless attack. No one should lose their life while worshipping God.

If these attacks on places of worship continue unchecked, they will not only violate the constitutional right of Nigerians to freely worship but will also create an atmosphere of fear that threatens the very fabric of our religious society.


We call on the Federal and State Governments to take immediate and practical steps to protect our citizens throughout this yuletide season and beyond.

Nigerians deserve more than empty promises and political rhetoric. We need concrete, actionable security strategies deployed on the ground.

This escalating insecurity has become unbearable and must be confronted with the urgency and seriousness it deserves
 
• Comrade Ini Ememobong is the
National Publicity Secretary,
People’s Democratic Party

Continue Reading

Trending