Politics
PDP reacts to Supreme Court’s Emergency Rule judgement
PDP, in its reaction, describe the judgement as “a dangerous democratic bend,” saying , “While we respect the authority of the apex court and recognise its finality within our jurisdiction…
The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has reacted to the apex court’s judgement today which upheld that the President has the constitutional power to impose a state of emergency, in this case Rivers State.
PDP, in its reaction, describe the judgement as “a dangerous democratic bend,” saying , “While we respect the authority of the apex court and recognise its finality within our jurisdiction, we are nevertheless compelled to draw attention to the grave dangers that can emanate from the interpretation of the reasoning in this judgement on the political landscape of our country.”
In a statement signed by Comrade Ini Ememobong, National Publicity Secretary of the party, noted :
” Earlier today, a full panel of the Supreme Court finally delivered a split judgment (six to one) in the suit filed by the Attorney-General of Adamawa State and others against the Attorney-General of the Federation and the National Assembly.
The suit marked SC/CV/329/2025, challenged the powers of the President to suspend democratically elected officials like the Governor and Deputy Governor, and democratic institutions such as the Rivers State House of Assembly.
The Apex Court struck out the suit based on an absence of a cause of action but, went on to comment on the issues raised in the suit therein.
Their comments have been largely interpreted as upholding President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State earlier this year.
Our concern is anchored on the age-long principle of law that the express mention of one thing excludes others (expressio unius est exclusio alterius), and the clear constitutional position that no person or institution(other than the State House of Assembly or a court of law), is empowered to remove a Governor from office, even temporarily, during the subsistence of a constitutional term.
To hold otherwise is to create a pathway by which a President, with the active support of the National Assembly, can compel political alignment or compliance through the instrumentality of emergency powers in ways not envisaged by the Constitution.
We submit that the interpretation of this judgment has the potential to reverse the hard-won democratic gains by unwittingly making state governments completely subservient to the Federal Government, forcing them to seek to ‘connect to the centre’ by joining the ruling party, as we are already witnessing.
More troubling is the fact that the logical extension of this reasoning based on the provision of Section 305(3)(c) “extraordinary measures to restore peace and security” could, in the future, be interpreted to justify the suspension of other constitutional institutions, including the judiciary itself.
We cannot reconcile how in a federation (not a unitary state) an elected President can be empowered to dismantle the democratic structures of a federating unit, sack elected officials and appoint leaders there, without consciously promoting authoritarianism and entrenching tyranny.
As a political party wholly committed to the protection and consolidation of democracy in Nigeria, we hereby call on the National Assembly to urgently initiate constitutional and legislative safeguards that clearly define and limit the scope of emergency powers of the president, to prevent imminent abuse and preserve Nigeria’s federation.
We also urge Nigerians, civil society organisations, the media, and the international democratic community to remain vigilant in the defence of constitutionalism, federalism, and the sanctity of the electoral mandate.
We remain hopeful that, at the next opportunity, the Supreme Court will have cause to extensively clarify the constitutional boundaries of emergency powers, in the overriding interest of justice, democracy, and the long-term stability of our Republic.”
Politics
FCT Area Council election: INEC excludes LP candidates, give reasons
In a statement on Wednesday, the Commission’s Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Mrs. Victoria Eta-Messi, said the Labour Party’s challenge stemmed from “prolonged internal leadership disputes since 2024,” which, it noted, were settled by the Supreme Court in April 2025″
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has fixed February 21, 2026, for the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Area Council elections, but excluded the Labour Party candidates from the upcoming election, citing the Supreme Court rulings.
In a statement on Wednesday, the Commission’s Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Mrs. Victoria Eta-Messi, said the Labour Party’s challenge stemmed from “prolonged internal leadership disputes since 2024,” which, it noted, were settled by the Supreme Court in April 2025″.
According to the commission, the Supreme Court in Appeal No. SC/CV/56/2025 (Usman v. Labour Party) “unequivocally held that the tenure of the Barr. Julius Abure-led National Executive Committee had expired.”
INEC added that despite the judgment, “the Abure-led faction purportedly conducted primaries for the August 16, 2025, bye-election nationwide and the FCT Area Council Election.”
The commission further recalled that the Abure-led faction had earlier challenged its exclusion from the August 2025 bye-election at the Federal High Court, Abuja, but the suit was dismissed.
It said judgment delivered on August 15, 2025, “enforced the Supreme Court’s position that Barr. Julius Abure was no longer recognised as the National Chairman of the Labour Party and thus upheld the decision of INEC to exclude the Labour Party from the bye-election.”
INEC disclosed that the party subsequently filed several suits in different courts, all seeking orders to compel the commission to issue access codes for the FCT Area Council election.
These include cases at the Nasarawa State High Court, the Federal High Court in Abuja, and two divisions of the FCT High Court.
Politics
2027: LP’s Baba-Ahmed declares presidential ambition
Baba-Ahmed ‘s announcement comes barely one week after Obi announced his exit from the Labour Party to the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
The Labour Party’s Vice Presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Senator Datti Baba-Ahmed, formally declared his interest in contesting the presidency in 2027.
Baba-Ahmed, 56, the running mate to former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi, made the declaration at a rally held at the party’s national secretariat in Abuja on Wednesday.
Baba-Ahmed ‘s announcement comes barely one week after Obi announced his exit from the Labour Party to the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
This move has triggered intense debate over the party’s future and the direction of the wider opposition ahead of the next general election.
Speaking during a press briefing at the Labour Party’s national secretariat in Abuja, Baba-Ahmed made it clear that he would not follow Obi to the ADC.
He said, “I have made myself to contest for the office in 2027. I’m not following anybody’s trajectory or stepping into anybody’s shoes.
“Can I please remind you that before His Excellency Governor Peter Obi filed for the presidency, I aspired for the presidency before him? The records are there for you to see.”
“In October 2018, I participated in the primaries of the then PDP in Port Harcourt and walked to Obi for his vote, and he smiled at me. What a gentleman he was.
“If you heard me well in what I just submitted, I saw a rare opportunity for national unity to have elected Peter Obi in 2023. And that is why I decided to flow with it,” he said.
News
Atiku’s Media Office Accuses Tinubu Administration of Undermining Opposition
Vows to Resist in New Coalition Effort
In a strongly worded statement, the media office of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has accused President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration of systematically weakening opposition parties in Nigeria, aiming to establish a de facto one-party state amid ongoing economic hardships.
The press release, issued on Tuesday, describes the past three years under Tinubu as one of the harshest periods in recent Nigerian history, marked by “punishing economic policies and shrinking democratic space.”
It claims the All Progressives Congress (APC) government is pursuing a “calculated effort to eliminate political alternatives,” leaving the ruling party dominant “by default, not by merit.
“According to the statement signed by Paul Ibe of the Atiku Media Office, opposition leaders have responded by rallying around the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a “nucleus of a credible national alternative.” The ADC is portrayed as being on a “national rescue mission,” with Atiku and other figures central to the initiative.
The release directly addresses recent external pressures on the ADC, alleging that “agents aligned with the Presidency” are attempting to destabilize the party by interfering in its internal affairs, particularly regarding the selection of a presidential candidate.
It rejects any calls for Atiku to “step aside,” labeling such demands as “a gift to authoritarian ambition and a betrayal of the Nigerian people.
“Emphasizing the ADC’s commitment to an “open, transparent, and competitive process” for choosing its flagbearer, the statement warns that “APC proxies and external meddlers have no standing to intimidate, blackmail, or sabotage this democratic resolve.”
It notes the party is currently focused on building grassroots structures at ward, local government, and state levels, urging “disruptors and infiltrators” to cease interference.
The ADC remains “open and welcoming to all genuine opposition figures,” the release states, highlighting inclusiveness as the “soul of democracy.”
It asserts that when the nomination process begins, “all qualified aspirants will present themselves freely,” and no one is stepping down. In a pointed remark, it suggests that if anyone should step aside, it is President Tinubu, whose leadership is described as a “national liability.
“The statement references the recent public declaration of ADC membership by former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi in Enugu, which it says prompted “open boasts” from a serving minister and presidential aides about plans to undermine the party.
“Their fear is evident,” it adds.Concluding with a defiant tone, the release declares the ADC’s determination to “end the misfortune imposed by the Tinubu-led APC,” insisting that no amount of “intimidation, intrigue, or sabotage” will derail its mission. “Nigeria will not surrender its democracy without a fight,” it states.
This development comes amid growing political tensions in Nigeria, as opposition groups seek to consolidate ahead of future elections. Neither the Presidency nor the APC has immediately responded to the allegations.
-
Opinions1 day agoNigeria’s Democracy Under Siege: Opposition Faces Existential Threats
-
Politics3 days ago2027: I‘ll not allow myself to be buried politically — Wike
-
International2 days agoColombia and Mexico hit back at the U.S over Venezuela’s Maduro overthrow
-
News2 days ago2026 WAEC, NECO: FG introduces new measures to eliminate malpractices See the measures
-
News1 day agoNBA declares “Odogwu Lawyer” missing
-
Business3 days agoFlutterwave buys Mono for $40 million
-
News20 hours ago141 million Nigerian households to live in poverty this year – Report
-
Business3 days agoVenezuela: Crude prices edge lower following Maduro’s overthrow
