Connect with us

Politics

PDP reacts to Supreme Court’s Emergency Rule judgement

PDP, in its reaction, describe the judgement as “a dangerous democratic bend,” saying , “While we respect the authority of the apex court and recognise its finality within our jurisdiction…

Published

on

377 Views

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has reacted to the apex court’s judgement today which upheld that the President has the constitutional power to impose a state of emergency, in this case Rivers State.

PDP, in its reaction, describe the judgement as “a dangerous democratic bend,” saying , “While we respect the authority of the apex court and recognise its finality within our jurisdiction, we are nevertheless compelled to draw attention to the grave dangers that can emanate from the interpretation of the reasoning in this judgement on the political landscape of our country.”

In a statement signed by Comrade Ini Ememobong, National Publicity Secretary of the party, noted :

” Earlier today, a full panel of the Supreme Court finally delivered a split judgment (six to one) in the suit filed by the Attorney-General of Adamawa State and others against the Attorney-General of the Federation and the National Assembly.

The suit marked SC/CV/329/2025, challenged the powers of the President to suspend democratically elected officials like the Governor and Deputy Governor, and democratic institutions such as the Rivers State House of Assembly.

The Apex Court struck out the suit based on an absence of a cause of action but, went on to comment on the issues raised in the suit therein.

Their comments have been largely interpreted as upholding President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State earlier this year.

Our concern is anchored on the age-long principle of law that the express mention of one thing excludes others (expressio unius est exclusio alterius), and the clear constitutional position that no person or institution(other than the State House of Assembly or a court of law), is empowered to remove a Governor from office, even temporarily, during the subsistence of a constitutional term.

To hold otherwise is to create a pathway by which a President, with the active support of the National Assembly, can compel political alignment or compliance through the instrumentality of emergency powers in ways not envisaged by the Constitution.

We submit that the interpretation of this judgment has the potential to reverse the hard-won democratic gains by unwittingly making state governments completely subservient to the Federal Government, forcing them to seek to ‘connect to the centre’ by joining the ruling party, as we are already witnessing.

More troubling is the fact that the logical extension of this reasoning based on the provision of Section 305(3)(c) “extraordinary measures to restore peace and security” could, in the future, be interpreted to justify the suspension of other constitutional institutions, including the judiciary itself.

We cannot reconcile how in a federation (not a unitary state) an elected President can be empowered to dismantle the democratic structures of a federating unit, sack elected officials and appoint leaders there, without consciously promoting authoritarianism and entrenching tyranny.

As a political party wholly committed to the protection and consolidation of democracy in Nigeria, we hereby call on the National Assembly to urgently initiate constitutional and legislative safeguards that clearly define and limit the scope of emergency powers of the president, to prevent imminent abuse and preserve Nigeria’s federation.

We also urge Nigerians, civil society organisations, the media, and the international democratic community to remain vigilant in the defence of constitutionalism, federalism, and the sanctity of the electoral mandate.

We remain hopeful that, at the next opportunity, the Supreme Court will have cause to extensively clarify the constitutional boundaries of emergency powers, in the overriding interest of justice, democracy, and the long-term stability of our Republic.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Makinde to declare presidential ambition on Thursday

The event, tagged “Unity Mega Rally Ibadan 2026”, is expected to serve as the official launch of Governor Makinde’s anticipated 2027 presidential bid, alongside the unveiling of a grand political alliance between the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM)…

Published

on

By

41 Views

Governor Seyi Makinde is expected to formally declare his presidential ambition on Thursday, 14 May, during a major political rally scheduled to hold at the historic Mapo Hall in Ibadan.

The event, tagged “Unity Mega Rally Ibadan 2026”, is expected to serve as the official launch of Governor Makinde’s anticipated 2027 presidential bid, alongside the unveiling of a grand political alliance between the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM), as well as candidates aligned with the emerging coalition being championed by the Oyo State governor and his loyalists.

Reports indicate that preparations for the rally have intensified amid growing political realignments within Oyo State and the wider South-West region.

Several grassroots mobilisers, political associates and loyalists of Governor Makinde are reportedly making strategic moves as consultations over a broader political structure continue to gather momentum.

Continue Reading

Politics

APC Warns Aspirants Against Violence, Anti-Party Activities Ahead of Primaries

Published

on

46 Views

The All Progressives Congress National Chairman, Professor Nentawe Yilwatda, has urged all aspirants contesting on the platform of the party to maintain discipline, maturity, and sportsmanship ahead of the 2027 party primaries.

In a statement, Yilwatda said that the APC remains committed to conducting transparent, peaceful, and credible primaries capable of strengthening internal democracy and sustaining public confidence in the ruling party.

Yilwatda warned that the party leadership would not tolerate acts capable of disrupting the primaries, including violence, unrest, anti-party activities, or attempts to compromise the integrity of the process.

He stressed that any aspirant or supporter found culpable would face severe sanctions, including suspension from the party, adding that no personal ambition should override the collective interest of the APC and national stability.

The APC chairman reminded aspirants that democratic contests naturally produce winners and non-winners, urging all contestants to accept the outcome of the primaries in good faith.

According to him, democracy thrives on healthy competition, mutual respect, and acceptance of results, while aspirants must see themselves as ambassadors of the party whose conduct should reflect the values and vision of the APC.

He also commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for his commitment to strengthening democratic institutions and promoting unity within the party, and called on party members and stakeholders to support the President’s Renewed Hope Agenda and avoid divisive actions capable of overheating the political environment or undermining progress already recorded by the administration.

Highlighting achievements of the Tinubu administration, the APC chairman pointed to ongoing investments in road infrastructure, rail transportation, energy, agriculture, healthcare, technology, and the solid minerals sector.

He noted that the administration’s reforms are aimed at repositioning Nigeria for long-term economic growth, job creation, food security, and the attainment of a one trillion dollar economy through strategic investments and industrial expansion.

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku Holds the Key to Obi’s Presidential Ambition, By Emeka Monye

For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.

Published

on

By

51 Views

Image: Atiku , Kwankwaso, and Obi

IN Nigerian politics, timing and coalition are often more decisive than individual popularity.

As the 2027 presidential race begins to take shape, one calculation keeps recurring in political circles: the path for Peter Obi to unseat President Bola Tinubu runs through Atiku Abubakar.

2023 election

The 2023 election proved that Nigeria’s electorate is no longer locked into the old two-party rhythm.

For the first time in the Fourth Republic, three candidates ran competitive, nationwide campaigns, forcing analysts and party strategists to rethink long-held assumptions about voter behavior, regional loyalty, and the power of structure.

Heading into February 2023, most observers expected a straight contest between the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party.

Tinubu, Atiku and Obi

Bola Tinubu, former Lagos governor and APC national leader, carried the weight of the ruling party.

Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President and perennial contender, led the PDP. Then came Peter Obi.

The former Anambra governor’s defection from the PDP to the Labour Party galvanized a youth-driven movement that defied the traditional logic of ethnic and party strongholds.

What was supposed to be a two-horse race became a three-way contest, and the results reflected it.Tinubu was declared winner with 8,794,726 votes.

Atiku followed with 6,984,640 votes, winning 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory: Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Gombe, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, and Yobe.

Obi came third with 6,101,533 votes, but his spread was striking. He carried 11 states plus the FCT: Abia, Anambra, Cross River, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu, Imo, Lagos, Nasarawa, and Plateau.The numbers told a clear story.

No candidate won a majority

The combined votes of the two main opposition candidates—over 13 million—exceeded Tinubu’s total by more than 4 million.

The election was split along regional, generational, and class lines, but it also revealed a fragmented opposition that could not convert its numerical advantage into victory.

Beneath the campaign rhetoric was a deeper debate about power rotation. After eight years of Muhammadu Buhari, a northerner, many within the PDP argued that the presidency should return to the South in 2023.

It was not a constitutional requirement, but a political convention that had guided candidate selection since 1999. Senior PDP figures lobbied Atiku to step aside in the interest of equity.

The argument was straightforward: if the PDP was serious about national balance, it could not field another northerner immediately after Buhari.

Decision had consequences

Atiku, who had spent decades building a national network, disagreed. He won the party’s primary in May 2022, defeating 12 aspirants including Nyesom Wike and Bukola Saraki.His decision had consequences.

It pushed key southern PDP governors and stakeholders toward neutrality or outright defection.

It also created the opening for Obi to exit the PDP and build a movement outside the traditional party structure.

In hindsight, Atiku’s insistence preserved his base in the North but split the opposition vote in the South and Middle Belt.

Obi consolidated the South-East and South-South, broke into Lagos, and made inroads in the Christian belt of the North-Central.

Fast forward to 2027

Atiku held the core North and parts of the North-West and North-East. Tinubu took the South-West and split the North-Central. Fast forward to 2027, and the arithmetic hasn’t changed.

Tinubu will run as an incumbent with the full weight of the federal government and party machinery.

Obi has retained his support base and remains the face of the urban youth and middle-class vote. Rabiu Kwankwaso, who won Kano for the NNPP in 2023, remains a factor in the North-West.

Political analysts agree that any serious challenge to Tinubu requires the opposition to close ranks.

The most discussed scenario is a Obi-Kwankwaso ticket. Combined, their 2023 votes would exceed 7.6 million, and their regional reach covers the South-East, South-South, North-West, and pockets of the North-Central. On paper, it looks like a winning coalition.But the missing piece is Atiku’s 6.9 million votes.

Atiku’s base is concentrated in the North-East, North-West, and parts of the North-Central—regions where Obi and Kwankwaso underperformed in 2023.

Two-thirds of states and the FCT

Without that bloc, an Obi-Kwankwaso ticket would struggle to cross the constitutional requirement of 25% in two-thirds of states and the FCT.

With it, the opposition could flip enough states to make the race unwinnable for the incumbent.

This is why many in the opposition coalition argue that Atiku must be willing to sacrifice a fourth presidential run for the sake of defeating the APC.

The logic is simple: his 2023 votes have nowhere else to go. If he runs again, the opposition vote splits a third time, and Tinubu wins by default. If he steps aside and backs Obi, those votes become decisive.

The problem is not mathematical; it’s political and personal. Atiku has run for president six times and remains one of the most influential figures in the PDP.

Stepping aside would mean dismantling a structure built over 30 years and accepting a role as kingmaker rather than king.There’s also the question of trust.

After the 2023 primary and the fallout over the PDP’s zoning decision, relationships between Atiku, Obi, and the G-5 governors remain strained.

Any coalition would require ironclad agreements on power-sharing, policy direction, and the sequencing of political offices.

Ideology and messaging

Then there’s the issue of ideology and messaging. Obi’s campaign was built on “structurelessness,” competence, and anti-establishment sentiment.

Atiku represents the traditional political establishment. Merging those two brands without alienating either base will be delicate.

A closer look at the 2023 results shows where the opportunity lies. In states like Kaduna, Katsina, and Sokoto, Atiku won, but Obi came a strong second in urban centers.

Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes.

APC’s grip

In Lagos, Obi beat Tinubu outright, proving that the APC’s grip is not absolute even in its stronghold.

In the FCT, Obi won, while Atiku and Tinubu split the rest.If those patterns hold, and if Atiku’s northern base moves with him, an Obi-led ticket could redraw the electoral map.

The key would be holding the South-East and South-South, expanding in the North-Central, and peeling off enough votes in the North-West to prevent a Tinubu sweep.

Kwankwaso’s role is equally critical. Kano alone delivered 1.5 million votes to the NNPP in 2023.

A three-way deal between Obi, Kwankwaso, and Atiku would cover every major voting bloc outside the South-West.

The alternative is clear from 2023. When the opposition runs divided, the incumbent wins with a plurality.

Tinubu’s 37% vote share was the lowest for a winning candidate in Nigeria’s democratic history, yet it was enough because the opposition could not agree on a common front.

For Obi, the 2027 window may be his strongest. He has name recognition, a disciplined support base, and four years to build structure.

Northern votes

But without Atiku’s northern votes, he risks repeating 2023: winning the narrative but losing the numbers. For Atiku, the choice is equally stark.

A fourth run would likely produce a third-place finish and cement his legacy as the candidate who could not unite the opposition.

Stepping aside would be politically painful, but it would give him a chance to shape the next administration and secure his place in Nigeria’s democratic history.

Nigerian elections are rarely won on policy alone. They are won on coalition, timing, and the willingness of heavyweights to subordinate personal ambition to a larger goal. Atiku Abubakar holds more than votes. He holds leverage.

Whether he uses it to run again or to enable a new opposition coalition will determine whether 2027 becomes another four years of APC rule or the first real test of an alternative.

For Peter Obi, the path to Aso Rock is open, but the door is controlled by one man. The next 18 months will show whether that key turns.

Continue Reading

Trending