Connect with us

Business

JUST IN: Manufacturers Rejects 40% Electricity Tariff Hike on Mere 4000MW

Published

on

637 Views

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) has rejected the planned 40 percent hike in electricity tariff, which will become effective from July 1, calling on the government to shelve the increase until electricity generation , transmission and supply improves in the country.

The  Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC),  had said that the current tariff increase is based on the Service Based Tariff, SBT, benchmarked on an exchange rate of N441/$ and inflation of 16.97 per cent.

It argued that since the value of the naira to the dollar now hovers above N700 and current rate of inflation at 22.45 percent, it is necessary to increase tariff to mitigate operators’ cost of operations.
However, MAN, in its reaction, that beyond the present embattling high prices, starting July a 40 percent hike at this time is simply outrageous.
Segun Ajayi-Kadir, the Director-General of MAN, said that the expectation of the manufacturers is that the Federal Government and the NERC will ensure improvement in electricity generation, transmission and distribution that will lead to adequate and reliable electricity supply in the country, rather than increasing the tariff on the mere 4000MW to meet all revenue needs of stakeholders in the electricity supply industry.

” Government should ensure that at least 90 percent of electricity consumers are metered to ensure consumption reflective electricity bill payment, formulate electricity policies that will aid investment in energy industry to increase generation capacities that will usher in large scale production of electricity and ensure effective implementation of the recent Electricity Act (2023) that is aimed at increasing the electricity supply in the country,” he said.

The Association urges NERC to
▪︎ Eradicate outrageous bills by closing the metering gap through the liberalization of ultimate users’ access to effective mass metering;

▪︎Ensure the connection of all consumers to the electricity grid to avoid free riding and unfair charges on the few connected consumers;

▪︎ Work on efforts to increase the electricity supply base in order to distribute the total cost among a high number of consumers at a much lower unit cost;
▪︎ States and private investors should rise up to the challenge by taking advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to eradicate the energy poverty of their people.

Likely Effects of Tariff Hike On Manufacturing industries
As a matter of fact, a further rise in electricity tariff could lead to the following:

i. Costs of production will soar: Higher electricity tariff will directly increase the cost of production for manufacturers. Already, we have energy constituting between 28-40% in the cost structure of manufacturing industries.
You can imagine the impact on manufacturing industries that are energy-intensive such as metal processing, heavy machinery, and chemicals manufacturing.

ii. Profit margins will reduce: A spike in the electricity tariff will erode the profit margin of the manufacturers and reduce their ability to expand operations and create new jobs

iii. High probability of activities paralysis: This is a definite possibility among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) who are unable to accommodate the higher price.

iv. Potential decrease in the revenue collectable by government: The hike in electricity tariff will reduce the manufacturers’ profitability and by extension the quantum of taxes and fees payable to the three tiers of Government. Manufacturers remain the largest income taxpayer in the country. Therefore, in the event of poor income generation due to high costs of production, the government purse will suffer.

v. Manufacturers will ultimately pass on the additional cost to the consumers of their products: This will increase the cost of local made products in the market and complicate the rising inflation rate in the country.

vi. Recession of manufacturing activities: An increase in electricity tariff will reduce the purchasing capability. One of the resulting effects is the fall in demand and recession of manufacturing activities over time.

vii. The sector’s competitiveness will definitely worsen: The high cost of the products will make locally produced items less competitive, when compared with imported alternatives.
This is also true of exports, as Nigeria products may find it more difficult to penetrate foreign markets. Such a move will restrict our exports earnings because it will be impossible to compete with counterparts in the global trading environment.

viii. High probability of outward investment. Some manufacturing industries may consider shifting production to other economies with lower electricity tariffs and guaranteed availability.

Business

History of Naira Revaluation and Devaluation (1973–2026) (Part 1)

Why was the naira devalued?

Published

on

By

33 Views


The history of the Nigerian naira is marked by two major developments: periods when the currency gained value or was officially strengthened, and prolonged periods when it lost value against major international currencies, particularly the US dollar.


Since its introduction in 1973, the naira has undergone several exchange-rate policy changes, including fixed exchange rates, currency devaluations, foreign-exchange market liberalisation, attempts to unify exchange rates and market-driven depreciation.


The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has played a central role in managing these changes.

  1. Introduction of the Naira in 1973

  2. Nigeria introduced the naira on January 1, 1973, replacing the Nigerian pound.

  3. The conversion rate was:
    £1 Nigerian pound = ₦2.
    ₦1 = 10 shillings under the old currency system.
    ₦1 = 100 kobo.

  4. The new currency was introduced during a period of expanding oil revenues and economic growth.

  5. Nigeria initially maintained a relatively strong, managed exchange rate, supported by foreign-exchange controls and the country’s oil earnings.

  6. The introduction of the naira was a currency change, not a devaluation.
  7. The 1970s: A Relatively Strong Naira

  8. During the 1970s, rising oil revenues strengthened Nigeria’s foreign-exchange position.

  9. The government maintained a controlled exchange-rate system, initially linking the naira to the US dollar before moving to a basket of currencies representing major trading partners in 1978.

  10. The oil boom provided foreign exchange for imports, infrastructure and public expenditure.

  11. However, Nigeria’s dependence on crude oil revenues left the economy vulnerable to fluctuations in international oil prices.

  12. Key development: The naira benefited from a relatively strong external position, although its exchange rate was managed by the authorities rather than determined by an unrestricted market.
  13. The Early 1980s: Mounting Pressure on the Naira

  14. The economic situation deteriorated in the early 1980s as oil revenues weakened and foreign-exchange shortages intensified.

  15. Nigeria faced several economic challenges:
    • Declining oil receipts.
    • Rising import bills.
    • Pressure on foreign reserves.
    • Growing external debt and trade arrears.
    • Increasing demand for foreign currency.

  16. The government maintained controls on foreign exchange, but the official rate became increasingly disconnected from the rate at which foreign currency could be obtained in the parallel market.

  17. This created pressure for exchange-rate reform.
    The crisis set the stage for the introduction of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1986.
  18. 1986: Major Naira Devaluation Under SAP

  19. September 26, 1986, marked a turning point in the history of the naira.
    Under the military government of General Ibrahim Babangida, Nigeria introduced the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM) as part of the Structural Adjustment Programme.

  20. The objective was to allow market forces to play a greater role in determining the naira’s exchange rate.

  21. According to an International Monetary Fund account, the naira’s value was discounted by approximately 66 per cent at the inaugural SFEM auction.

  22. The exchange rate moved from about ₦1.60 per US dollar under the previous administered rate to approximately ₦4.60 per dollar at the initial auction.

  23. Why was the naira devalued?

  24. The policy was intended to:
    •Reduce the overvaluation of the naira.
    •Improve the allocation of scarce foreign exchange.
    •Encourage non-oil exports.
    •Improve the competitiveness of Nigerian products.
    •Reduce distortions in the foreign-exchange market.

  25. However, the weaker currency also increased the naira cost of imported goods and production inputs.

  26. The 1986 reform began a prolonged period of exchange-rate adjustments.
  27. …To be continued
Continue Reading

Business

Obasanjo Accuses Tinubu : “You Made Every Nigerian Poor By 300% Naira Devaluation”

The former President also rejected the argument that Tinubu needed more time to complete his reforms, saying he did not see the economy improving.

Published

on

By

32 Views

Image: AI generated

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has accused President Bola Tinubu of making every Nigerian poor by 300 per cent through the devaluation of the naira.

Obasanjo spoke on Wednesday during the Financial Times Africa Summit 2026 in London, United Kingdom.

He said that the naira lost its value overnight due to economic reforms undertaken by the Tinubu administration in 2023.

“We do not live in isolation as a country. We interact with the rest of the world. And overnight, you devalue the currency by 300 per cent. The naira went from N500 to a dollar to N1,500 to a dollar. What that meant was that every Nigerian is made poor by 300 per cent.”

Obasanjo said that had made Nigeria “the poverty capital of the world,” which he said meant the country had the largest number of poor people in the world.

“You cannot say to me that that is good for Nigeria. You cannot say to me that that is good for us in any sense,” he noted.

The former President also rejected the argument that Tinubu needed more time to complete his reforms, saying he did not see the economy improving.

Continue Reading

Business

CBN Licences Abbey Bank to Start Full Commercial Banking in November 2026

Adewumi said: “The year 2026 represents a defining moment in the history of Abbey. Our approval to transition to commercial banking is a testament to the work invested in building this institution and the confidence placed in us by our regulators, shareholders, customers and employees.”

Published

on

By

34 Views

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has approved Abbey Bank Plc to begin operation as a regional commercial bank, effectively from November 2026.

The licence opens retail banking, small and medium-sized enterprise lending, trade finance and corporate banking to the lender.

Abbey Bank had operated as a mortgage bank for more than three decades.

The commercial banking licence was issued in June 2026 after the bank completed its capital-raising process.

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Mobolaji Adewumi said the bank began internal discussions on the transition in 2023 and submitted a formal application in 2024.

He said regulatory approval arrived in October 2024.

Adewumi said: “The year 2026 represents a defining moment in the history of Abbey. Our approval to transition to commercial banking is a testament to the work invested in building this institution and the confidence placed in us by our regulators, shareholders, customers and employees.”

Continue Reading

Trending