Connect with us

Business

Fuel subsidy: NLC, Affiliates Disagrees over Suspension of Strike

Published

on

The ongoing controversy over the removal of fuel subsidy appears to have caused a heavy crack within the fold of the labour unions in the country, especially the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC.

Ohibaba.com had reported earlier that the union had earlier announced that it would commence an industrial action effective today, (Wednesday) June 7.

However, after a meeting with the Federal Government, the NLC leadership called off the strike.

The Trade Union Congress, TUC, was the first to toe that line after a similar meeting with the FG, with the NLC absent during the earlier dialogue.

The development has not gone down well with the state chapters of the unions who feel they were not carried along before their leaders reached the agreement with the Federal Government.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, who led the government delegation, disclosed the resolutions reached with the labour unions after a meeting at the Aso Villa.

According to him, the Federal Government, the TUC and the NLC would establish a joint committee to review the proposal for any wage increase or award and establish a framework and timeline for implementation.

“The Federal Government, the TUC and the NLC would review the World Bank Financed Cash transfer scheme and propose the inclusion of low-income earners in the programme”, the communique reads in part.

A chairman of the NLC in one of the states said their members were not happy with the hasty withdrawal of the industrial action without the Federal Government shifting ground on the main issue.

He spoke after the NLC convened a National Executive Committee, NEC, meeting on Tuesday, to inform their members of the latest development.

The State chairman, who was not pleased with the outcome of the meeting said: “It was a one agenda meeting to brief us on their resolution with the federal government.

“You have seen the communique the national body signed; they have confirmed to us they were part of it. All those things stated therein were the issues they raised before the federal government.

“So we will set up a technical committee that will look at them and come up with a lasting solution, so to speak, that will help to assuage the sufferings of the people with regard to the removal of the fuel subsidy.

“There was nothing much. We were briefed and they informed us that they were part of those items in the communique; that it was their agreement.

“For me and some others also, I expected a situation where the new price regime would have been suspended. The issues that were raised should hold sway but they have to suspend the price regime while this discussion goes on.

“That would have made them to hasten the discussion and come up with a workable agreement. Thereafter, the new price regime can now come in.

“But since they have decided to put the horse before the cart, then let it be. That’s just the resolution as contained in that document. They are meeting on June 19th, it’s on that day that the technical committee will take off.

“Of course, it has to be as soon as possible. It’s not going to be an indefinite thing.”

Recall that the NLC had last Friday directed its members and affiliates to begin nationwide protest and withdrawal of services from Wednesday (today) if the federal government fails to compel the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPCL, to reverse the petrol pump price increase.

On Wednesday last week, the NNPCL announced a new fuel price template nationwide. The effect saw fuel pump prices increase from N197 per litre to over N500 nationwide.

The development followed President Bola Tinubu’s inaugural speech announcing the removal of fuel subsidy.

Tinubu had promised he would stop the controversial scheme if elected president.

He spoke before the February 25 election at a business luncheon with business owners titled: “Business Forward” in Lagos, where he hinted that, no matter how long people protest, it would not stop him from removing fuel subsidies.

He maintained that Nigeria would not continue to subsidise fuel consumption in neighbouring countries.

“How can we subsidise the fuel consumption of Cameroon, Niger, and the Benin Republic. No matter how long you protest, we are going to remove the subsidy,” he said.

Although former President Muhammadu Buhari’s government had announced the subsidy policy would end by June when the budget for the initiative would expire, Tinubu bears the brunt of its implementation.

Prior to the announcement of the suspension of the strike, the Federal Government had approached the National Industrial Court in Abuja seeking an interim order restraining the NLC and the TUC from going on strike as planned, pending the determination of the motion on notice.

Ohibaba.com had reported that the National Industrial Court granted the FG’s application and ordered the Labour unions not to strike.

The FG had submitted that the proposed strike could disrupt economic activities, the health sector and the educational sector.

They also claimed that the strike may gravely affect the larger society and the well-being of the nation at large.

Meanwhile, the TUC has demanded that the “minimum wage should be increased from the current N30,000 to N200,000 before the end of June 2023, with consequential adjustment on the cost of feeding allowance, like feeding, transport, and housing”.

While addressing journalists on Monday, the union’s President, Mr Festus Osifo, and General Secretary, Mr Nuhu Toro called for the immediate implementation of the demands, including a Tax holiday for government and private sector employees earning less than N200,000 or 500USD monthly.

TUC also asked that “A representative of state governors would be a party to any negotiation and must commit to implementing the new minimum wage.”

They also called for introducing PMS Allowance for workers that earn between N200,000 to N500,000 or 500USD to 1,200USD.

The NLC said the authorities should have listened to the poor masses before removing the fuel subsidy.

Prof Oguguo Egwu, the Ebonyi State chairman of the Congress, made the remark in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria, NAN, on Monday in Abakaliki.

“The increase has led to the suffering of the masses. Imagine paying N550 per litre of fuel in Ebonyi here. Go back to the status quo and let us have room for negotiation. There is a need to listen to the poor.

“The federal government can do it without inflicting injury on citizens. Make sure that the people are not suffering. Have the interest of the masses at heart and not cause injury to them,” Egwu said.

On his part, the Enugu State chairman of the NLC, Comrade Barrister Fabian Nwigbo, said the national body of the NLC would be meeting by 2 pm on Tuesday (yesterday) to deliberate on the communique reached with the federal government.

Nwigbo lamented that the action being taken by the Federal Government, including its meeting with the NLC, is belated because people are already suffering.

He stated that the government should have put in place measures and palliatives to cushion the effect of the new policy.

”The national body has just invited us for a meeting at 2 pm today (Tuesday), and I think it is in line with that information on social media. So we, all of us in different States, have been discussing on our platform, waiting for that meeting to know whether that was what happened in that meeting, and then the way forward.

”But for now, we have not been properly briefed. I only got a message this morning inviting me to a virtual meeting by 2 pm. at the national office.

“So the practice is that since we had our emergency NEC last Friday, we were told not to do anything other than issues raised and agreed upon during that meeting, one may not comfortably discuss those items in that communique without hearing from the national.

”I cannot say exactly whether they (States) are carried along because I don’t have that privilege of that information. However, it is normal for state governments to wait and decide from agreements between labour or critical stakeholders and the federal government.

“So states will not come out now to say, remove fuel subsidy or don’t remove fuel subsidy, or we will do this or do that. They are waiting for that to be concluded at the national level. And after that decision, they will be given direction on what to do.

“I am aware that the presidency is saying that it has discussed with the Governors and that discussion will continue regarding what should be the palliatives that will help cushion the effect of this fuel subsidy removal.

“But to me, those things are belated. If you want to remove fuel subsidies, after removing them, you start talking about how to improve things for people; it is belated.

“Ordinarily, even with the communique that is coming now, issues ought to have been discussed and the communique in place before he removed the fuel subsidy.

”What I am saying in effect is that whatever they are doing now, even the meeting between the NLC and government representatives, for me, it’s belated; people are already suffering.

“And you know, in Nigeria, once the commodities prices have already stepped up, they can never come down, no matter what you decide. But there is nothing we can do; we will continue.

“If we succeed in our actions by his grace, the government may decide to put in our agreement certain things that may help people survive this harsh condition that the federal government has put everybody into.”

However, the Director-General of Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies, MINILS, Ilorin, Comrade Issa Aremu, hailed the ongoing dialogue between FG and the Labour union.

Comrade Aremu said the current policy debate is good for national development, adding that what is needed is to “work out win-win options” for the downstream petroleum sector in particular and Nigeria as a whole.

He expressed optimism that through the exchange of facts, negotiations and compromises, both the government and labour would find common ground for the inevitable reform of the downstream petroleum sector, which he said the sector unions, namely PENGASSAN and NUPENG, have been pushing for years.

“Neither policy reversal nor mass protest is an option, but genuine negotiation and social dialogue would make the deregulation policy a reality without compromising the welfare of the citizens with respect to welfare and securing jobs,” he said.

Comrade Aremu commended the initiative of President Bola Tinubu for meeting with labour leaders, which he described as “not only labour friendly but a leader that is accessible and open to engagement”.

He challenged labour and civil society to reciprocate the presidential gesture with creative options to protect public and private jobs.

Meanwhile, the NLC says it has rejected the ruling of the National Industrial Court, NIC, favouring the Federal Government against the interest of the masses and workers in the country.

Mr Joe Ajaero, NLC President said this in a communique jointly signed with Mr Emmanuel Ugboaja, General Secretary of the Congress at the end of an emergency National Executive Council, NEC, meeting on Tuesday in Abuja.

It said that the NEC meeting was called to discuss the outcome of the dialogue between the NLC and the Federal Government on the petroleum product price hike.

The NLC said the NEC in session resolved that there was a need to show the government that it was important to comply with laid down laws and court rulings.

“Especially as it concerns obedience to the rulings of the Courts and their brazen disregard to the 2023 Appropriation Act.

“To therefore support and accept the decision of the leadership of Congress to suspend the proposed strike action in compliance with the flawed rulings of the NIC.

“Also to allow negotiations to flow freely and enable final agreement during or after the 19th June, 2023, negotiation round with the federal government.

“To however register in strongest terms its disgust and disapproval with the ruling of the NIC for its continuous weaponization of the instrument of Exparte injunction in favour of the government.

“That it is against the interests of Nigerian workers in defiance of the position of the Supreme Court on the use of this instrument,” the communique read.

Congress further stated that all Affiliates and State Councils of Congress are hereby directed to suspend further action and mobilisation until the outcome of the final negotiations.

The communiqué commended all Affiliates and State Councils on their robust mobilisation towards a successful nationwide strike and to also remain vigilant in case there is a need to continue.

Business

Top Ten Ponzi Schemes That Have Stolen From Nigerians

From MMM to CBEX, here’s a rundown of the most notable scams that have drained billions from Nigerians since 2016.

Published

on

By

Despite repeated warnings by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria, , Nigerians continue to fall victim to Ponzi schemes promising quick returns.

From MMM to CBEX, here’s a rundown of the most notable scams that have drained billions from Nigerians since 2016.

1. MMM Nigeria (2016)

The most infamous Ponzi scheme in Nigeria’s history, MMM Nigeria promised returns of up to 30% within 30 days. The scheme attracted millions before it crashed in December 2016, leaving countless investors in financial ruin.

2. Ultimate Cycler, Get Help Worldwide, Twinkas, iCharity Club, Loopers Club, Givers Forum (2016)

These platforms emerged in the shadow of MMM’s popularity. Using referral networks and cycling models, they lured thousands with mouthwatering promises, only to vanish within months.

3. NNN Nigeria, MMM Cooperation, GCCH, RevoMoney (2017)

After the MMM crash, copycat schemes took over, rebranding old models with new names. NNN and MMM Cooperation tried to ride on the MMM name, exploiting previous participants who still hoped to recover losses.

4. Bitclub Advantage, Million Money, Helping Hands International (2018)

These schemes masqueraded as crypto-based platforms or charity networks.

They capitalized on the growing interest in digital currencies but delivered the same outcome — massive losses.

5. Loom and Crowd1 (2019)

Viral social media campaigns fueled the rise of Loom and Crowd1. Promoters used WhatsApp and Facebook to promise “double your money” schemes that quickly collapsed when recruitment stalled.

6. InksNation, Lion’s Share, Baraza Multipurpose Cooperative (2020)

InksNation promised a digital currency that would end poverty but was shut down by the SEC. Baraza claimed to be a cooperative but operated like a classic Ponzi, while Lion’s Share mimicked MLM structures.

7. Racksterli, Eagle Cooperative, 86FB (2020–2021)

These platforms used influencer marketing and sports betting gimmicks. 86FB, in particular, gained popularity before crashing spectacularly, taking millions from investors.

8. FINAFRICA, Royal Q (Nigeria version), Ovaioza (2022)

FINAFRICA used the lure of forex trading. Royal Q posed as a crypto trading bot, and Ovaioza claimed to store and sell agricultural produce. All failed to deliver on promised returns.

9. CALA Finance, 6Dollars Investment, Sidra Investment, WealthBuddy, Compoundly (2023–2024)

These new-age platforms were heavily marketed online. Sidra was a clone scam, while others mimicked DeFi and crypto investment trends, using hype and bonuses to attract victims.

10. BitFinance Global and CBEX (2025)

In the latest wave, BitFinance Global and CBEX are among the schemes already causing financial pain in 2025.

They repeat the same patterns — false claims, unrealistic returns, and eventual disappearance.

(Words and Image credit: Vanguard )

Continue Reading

Business

Oyetola Says CVFF Fund to be disbursed through Lending Institutions

The CVFF, established under the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act of 2003, over two decades, was designed to empower Nigerian shipping companies through access to structured financing for vessel acquisition.

Published

on

By

The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, says that the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) will be disbursed to eligible shipping companies through the government-approved lending institutions.

Oyetola said: ” Qualified applicants can access up to $25 million each at competitive interest rates to acquire vessels that meet international safety and performance standards.

The fund will be administered in partnership with carefully selected and approved primary lending institutions (PLIs), ensuring professional and efficient disbursement.”

Accordingly, Oyetola has directed the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) to commence the process that will lead to the long-awaited disbursement of the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF).

The CVFF, established under the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act of 2003, over two decades, was designed to empower Nigerian shipping companies through access to structured financing for vessel acquisition.

However, successive administrations failed to operationalise the fund for indigenous shipping until now.

Oyetola, in a press statement by the Media and Communications Adviser to the Minister, Dr Bolaji Akinola, yesterday, lamented that for over 20 years, the CVFF remained a dormant promise.He said this is not just about disbursing funds but about rewriting a chapter in the nation’s maritime history, saying:

“Today, we are bringing it to life deliberately, transparently and strategically.”NIMASA, in alignment with the Minister’s directive, has already issued a marine notice inviting eligible Nigerian shipping companies to apply. “

Continue Reading

Business

FIRS Targets N25.2tr Revenue in 2025

In a keynote address during the opening ceremony of a two-day workshop, organised by the Service on “Tax Expenditure and its Effects on Government Revenue”, the FIRS chairman said that under the current dispensation, the Service was contributing an average of over 60 percent monthly to the Federation Account.

Published

on

By

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is determined to rake in N25.2 trillion revenue in 2025, higher than the N21.6 trillion it collected in 2024.

This was disclosed by FIRS Executive Chairman, Dr Zacch Adedeji, who noted that the FIRS was facing the challenge of ever-increasing demand for greater tax revenue collection by government at all levels, especially in the face of dwindling direct revenue contribution by some Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).

In a keynote address during the opening ceremony of a two-day workshop, organised by the Service on “Tax Expenditure and its Effects on Government Revenue”, the FIRS chairman said that under the current dispensation, the Service was contributing an average of over 60 percent monthly to the Federation Account.

Adedeji, who was represented by FIRS Coordinating Director, Corporate Services Group, Bola Akintola, said that this is due to several proactive and reformative steps adopted by the Service.

He, however, said that the government was losing revenue through tax incentives, which had been difficult to quantify due to limited data availability.

Continue Reading

Trending