Politics
Transmission of election results: ADC Differs With Senate; ” Pass the law, don’t decide for INEC”
Akpabio said the concern was that mandating real-time transmission could lead to legal disputes if network failures occurred during elections.
• Book Launch: “The Burden of Legislators in Nigeria”, authored by Senator Effiong Bob, in Abuja.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio has dismissed criticisms trailing the Senate’s amendment of the Electoral Act, saying commentators and civil society actors are misjudging the legislature based on an incomplete legislative process and misunderstanding of parliamentary procedures.
Akpabio spoke in Abuja as special guest of honour at the unveiling of a book, “The Burden of Legislators in Nigeria”, authored by Senator Effiong Bob, in Abuja.
Speaking on the controversy surrounding the removal of the phrase “real-time” electronic transmission of election results, Akpabio said that the Senate had not concluded work on the bill and that public debate was premature.
“The Electoral Act amendment is incomplete. We have not completed it, but they are already on television. They don’t understand lawmaking.
“They don’t even know that what is in the Senate is not completed until we look at the Votes and Proceedings,” he said.
Akpabio explained that the Votes and Proceedings stage allows senators to correct, amend, or clarify decisions made on the floor before final approval, stressing that only after this process can the Senate’s position be considered final.
“When we bring out the Votes and Proceedings, any senator has a right to rise and say, ‘On clause three, this was what we agreed upon.’ That is the only time you can talk about what the Senate has done or not done,” he said.
He criticised commentators for what he described as “abuse” of the legislature, accusing some civil society actors of attempting to impose their views on lawmakers.
“People have become mouth legislators. Go and contest election if you want to talk about lawmaking and go and join them and make the law.
Retreats are not lawmaking; retreats are part of consultations. So why do you think that the paper you agreed in Lagos during a retreat must be what is agreed on the floor?” he asked.
Akpabio insisted that the Senate did not remove electronic transmission of election results, clarifying that lawmakers only questioned the requirement for real-time transmission.
“I must state clearly, without ambiguity, that the Senate has not removed any means of transmission. If you want to use a bicycle to carry your votes from one polling unit to the ward centre, do so. If you want to use your phone to transmit, do so. If you want to use your iPad, do so,” he said.
Akpabio said the concern was that mandating real-time transmission could lead to legal disputes if network failures occurred during elections.
“All we said was that we should remove the word ‘real time,’ because if you say real time and there is grid failure and the network is not working, when you go to court somebody will say it ought to have been real time,” he explained.
According to him, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should determine the mode and timing of result transmission within the framework of the law.
The Senate President warned that insisting on real-time transmission could invalidate results in areas with poor connectivity or insecurity.
“Real time means that in over nine states where networks are not working because of insecurity, there will be no election results.
Nationally, if the national grid collapses and no network is working, no election results will be valid,” he said.
He cited a Supreme Court ruling which, he said, acknowledged Nigeria’s inadequate infrastructure and emphasised that electronic transmission is only supplementary to the statutory collation process.
“The result is in Form EC8A. It will be carried from the polling unit to the ward centre, from there to the local government collation centre, to the senatorial collation centre, to the state collation centre, and finally the national collation centre,” he said.
Akpabio stressed that the amendment bill had not yet completed the bicameral legislative process and that a conference committee would reconcile differences between the Senate and House of Representatives versions before final passage.
“It is only when we have finished that that you will now say the National Assembly has passed any amendment to the Electoral Act,” he said.
He urged critics to allow the process to run its course, warning against attempts to “rubbish the process” before its conclusion.
Akpabio said electoral reforms must be grounded in legal and institutional capacity, warning against imposing technology beyond the country’s infrastructure.
“We insist that electoral reforms must be anchored in law, guided by capacity, secured against abuse and applied uniformly across the nation.
Technology must serve democracy; it must not endanger democracy,” he said.
He added: “You stay in a place that has no wire, no light, and you want to put in the law ‘real time.’ Progress must not bring about injustice.”
The Senate President warned that mistrust of institutions without understanding legislative processes could weaken democracy.
“When people do not understand their legislature, democracy is at risk. Democracy is measured not by passion alone, but by principles,” he said.
He also recalled that the current Electoral Act enabled competitive elections in 2023, including losses by the then ruling party in key states.
“This same Electoral Act made the incumbent party almost lose millions of votes. We lost in places like Lagos and Kano. New parties won whole regions with the same act, whether real-time electronic transfer or not,” he said.
Akpabio concluded that laws must be made for posterity rather than partisan advantage, adding: “You don’t make law for an individual or for opposition. You make law to outlast you, for generations unborn.”
Earlier in his opening remarks, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and former President of the Senate, Senator David Mark, who was the chairman of occasion, urged the National Assembly to pass the Bill and not to speak for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“What the ADC is saying is, pass the law. Let INEC decide whether they can do it (real-time electronic transmission) or not. Don’t speak for INEC.
“The stand of ADC is clear; pass the bill and let INEC decide on what it will do with it”, Mark said.
Several speakers at the event, including Akwa Ibom State Governor, Pastor Umo Eno, and the book reviewer, Professor Maxwell Gidado SAN, praised Senator Bob’s courage in writing the book to bring to light the challenges the Nigerian legislator faces in the course of performing his duties.
The author Senator Bob enumerated some of the challenges, saying that they included electoral battles, conflict with governors/godfathers, the judiciary through cancellation of victory, addressing the private issues of the electorate and self-inflicted challenges.
“The courage to defend democracy is in the legislature and the legislators”, he said.
Politics
NBA Cautions Lawyers Against Involvement in Political Party Disputes
The association cited Section 83 of the Electoral Act, which it said restricts courts from entertaining suits relating to the internal affairs of political parties, warning that such actions could undermine Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Photo: NBA President, Afam Osigwe (SAN) | Credit: NBA (X).
The President of Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Afam Osigwe (SAN) on Friday cautioned lawyers and courts against involvement in the internal affairs of political parties.
The association cited Section 83 of the Electoral Act, which it said restricts courts from entertaining suits relating to the internal affairs of political parties, warning that such actions could undermine Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Osigwe, in a statement said that the NBA had observed a growing trend of litigation aimed at drawing courts into intra-party disputes, despite clear statutory provisions limiting judicial intervention in such matters.
Osigwe emphasised that the recent political and legal developments arising from the interpretation of the Electoral Act 2022 raise serious constitutional and rule-of-law concerns.
Osigwe further noted that the law also prohibits courts from granting interim or interlocutory injunctions in such disputes.
The statement read in part, “Where any action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter.”
The NBA expressed concern that, contrary to these provisions, courts have continued to entertain such cases, sometimes issuing orders that affect party leadership contests and internal governance structures.
It also accused some lawyers of filing suits aimed at securing judicial intervention in political disputes through forum shopping and what it described as “mala fide applications” to obtain favourable orders.“
This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and mala fide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage does no good for our democracy,” the association said.
The NBA warned that continued judicial involvement in such matters could turn court processes into instruments of political manipulation.
It stressed that the relevant provisions of the Electoral Act were designed to prevent abuse of court processes and preserve the integrity of internal party democracy.
The association also reminded legal practitioners of their professional responsibilities, stating that lawyers must not act as political agents in pursuit of partisan outcomes.“The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility,” it said.
The NBA warned that it would initiate disciplinary action against any lawyer found to have violated these provisions.
Politics
2027: Bode George warns INEC, Judiciary Drifting Nigeria Towards ” One Party Rule”
” They are ready to destroy all democratic fundamentals, tenets and ethos to have their way, ” said Chief George , urging all leaders and elders, regardless of party affiliations, to rise and condemn what is happening,
“You want to be the only presidential candidate in 2027, in a multi-cultural, multi-religious and multi-ethnic country like Nigeria in the 21st Century. How is that possible? We must encourage a multi-party democracy. That is the spinal cord of participatory democracy.’’
That’s Chief Olabode George, an elder statesman and the former Deputy National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), while reflecting on the current happenings in the country ‘s government and politics space.
Chief George, who stated this in a statement issued by him on Thursday, said that actions and utterances coming from APC and INEC in recent weeks showed that they don’t want any other presidential candidate to emerge in 2027 aside from President Bola Tinubu of the APC
“They are ready to destroy all democratic fundamentals, tenets and ethos to have their way, ” said Chief George , urging all leaders and elders, regardless of party affiliations, to rise and condemn what is happening, emphasising, “You don’t appease evil. You deal with evil.”
The elder statesman said that the Chairman of INEC, Prof. Joash Amupitan, was a pitiable sight when he appeared on a television programme to defend the actions of the Electoral umpire in using technicalities to sack Excos of political parties.
“Enough is enough. This nation must not sink. At 80 years, what am I looking for? I was in Form 4 in secondary school when the Western Region crisis started in 1962. I don’t think some of those causing a crisis in the polity today were born then. Military or civilian, I have seen it all. We must not allow this country to go down,” he said.
We are firing the warning shot now. Nigeria is too big to be manipulated by a greedy and selfish few
Chief George said that he chose to sound a note of warning because Nigeria is too big to be manipulated.
“We are firing the warning shot now. Nigeria is too big to be manipulated by a greedy and selfish few. Look at insecurity. This country is gradually collapsing. I don’t want to hear anything like external factors or elements.
Those killing and kidnapping Nigerians all over the place are in this country. Instead of the president, as the Commander-in-Chief, to deal with these bloodthirsty maniacs, he is busy using INEC to destroy opposition parties.”
He appealed to Nigerians not to allow such a thing to happen, saying, “It is unfortunate that the electoral body has become an undertaker, mandated by the ruling party to destroy this democracy.
“Unfortunately, our judiciary is also drifting. I remember the glorious years of Justices Elias, Kayode Eso, Oputa, Belgore, Uwais, and others. Today, the rot in the judiciary is appalling.
“Any evil is a reflection of injustice. There is evil in the country today. Clearly, injustice can never overcome justice. When you deliver good judgments, justice is done. When you use technicalities to deliver wrong judgments, it is injustice,” he said.
Politics
Rep Dasuki Joins ADC, says INEC Chair Becoming Threat to Nigeria’s Multi-party Democracy
Rep Dasuki specifically cited the decision of INEC not to recognize the David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a critical step in what he believes is a broader scheme to stifle opposition and dismantle democratic plurality.
Abdussamad Dasuki, a House of Representative ‘s member representing Tambuwal/Kebbe Federal Constituency of Sokoto State, has observed that the Independent National Electoral Commission, under the leadership of Prof Joash Amupitan, is becoming an existential threat to Nigeria’s multiparty democracy.
Dasuki stated this on Wednesday when he picked up his membership card of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) at his Dogon Daji/Salah Ward, Tambuwal LGA of Sokoto, alleging that the commission was colluding with those plotting to stifle opposition party and turn Nigeria into one-party state.
The event witnessed a massive turnout of supporters, including hundreds of members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and other parties who formally defected to the ADC.
Addressing the enthusiastic crowd, Rep Dasuki warned that recent developments in the country’s political landscape point to a coordinated effort to weaken opposition voices and undermine democratic principles.
Rep Dasuki specifically cited the decision of INEC not to recognize the David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a critical step in what he believes is a broader scheme to stifle opposition and dismantle democratic plurality.
-
Business2 days agoCrude Oil Prices Drop Below $95 After US-Iran Ceasefire
-
Politics2 days agoAtiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, Aregbesola, Storm INEC Hqtrs in Protests
-
Politics2 days agoCoalition Leaders Rouse Nigerians to Reject ‘One Party ‘Rule’, Warning INEC “Don’t kill Democracy”
-
Politics2 days agoRep Dasuki Joins ADC, says INEC Chair Becoming Threat to Nigeria’s Multi-party Democracy
-
International2 days agoIran reopens Strait of Hormuz following two-week cease-fire agreement with Trump
-
News1 day agoINEC releases updated voters registration figure nationwide
-
News12 hours agoCBN Debunks Viral Fake News of ₦5,000 Banknote Featuring President Tinubu’s Image
-
News1 day agoUS Declares 23 Nigerian States High-Risk for Citizens
