Connect with us

Crime

Robert Mugabe Jr. Convicted of Drug Offense, Says He’s a Single Father

Published

on

292 Views

Robert Mugabe Junior, 33, the son of late former president Robert Mugabe, has been found guilty of illegal possession of drugs by the Harare Magistrates Court. Magistrate Lisa Mutendereki delivered the ruling on Thursday, 13 November 2025.

Mugabe pleaded guilty to possessing two grams of dagga, admitting the offence in open court. During proceedings, he appealed to the court for leniency, revealing that he is a single father of two.

“I am a single father raising two children. I ask the court to be lenient with me,” he said.

Sentencing is scheduled for later Thursday afternoon.

Found With Dagga During Traffic Stop

The case stems from a traffic stop on 1 October 2025, when police intercepted Mugabe’s silver Honda Fit in central Harare. Officers discovered a small quantity of dagga in his bag.

Prosecutor Mandirasa Chigumira told the court the search uncovered:

  • Two sachets of dagga
  • One pack of Rizla rolling papers
  • A white dagga crusher

The total haul weighed two grams, with an estimated street value of US$30 (R550). Chigumira also noted that Mugabe had initially refused to sign the seizure receipt issued by police.

Previous Court Appearance and Bail

Mugabe first appeared in court on 2 October 2025 and spent two nights in custody before being granted bail of US$300 (R5,500). Magistrate Mutendereki ordered him to report weekly to the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) and remain at his registered address until the case concluded.

The trial has attracted widespread attention on social media, with public reactions divided over his conviction.

Police Allegations of Wider Syndicate

Earlier, the Zimbabwe Republic Police suggested Mugabe might be connected to a larger drug network. Commissioner Paul Nyathi told reporters on 2 October 2025 that authorities had recovered 25 sachets of Indo hybrid dagga and six ecstasy pills linked to a syndicate allegedly involving Phillip Munetsi Chiyangwa, Mitchel Jackson, Simbarashe Kaseke, Wellington Icube, and Tanaka Kashamba.

However, prosecutors focused solely on Mugabe’s personal possession charge in court, leaving the wider syndicate allegations unaddressed.

History of Legal Trouble

This is not Mugabe Junior’s first legal issue. In February 2023, he was arrested for allegedly damaging property at a party in Harare. That case was later dropped following compensation. His lawyer, Ashiel Mugiya, who represented him in 2023, again defended him in this case, saying:

“He accepts responsibility for what happened and has cooperated with the authorities.”

Mugabe is expected back in court Thursday afternoon for sentencing, when Magistrate Mutendereki will determine his punishment.

Crime

UPDATE: DSS Arraigns Nasir El-Rufai, Pleads Not Guilty to 5 Count Charges

Published

on

29 Views

The Department of State Services (DSS) on Thursday arraigned former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai on a newly amended five-count charge involving the alleged unlawful wiretapping of National Security Adviser (NSA) Nuhu Ribadu.

Appearing before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik at the Federal High Court in Abuja, El-Rufai pleaded not guilty to all counts.

The charges allege violations of the Cybercrimes Amendment Act 2024 and the Nigerian Communications Act 2003, specifically regarding unauthorized interception of communications and compromising public safety.

The case originated from a February 13, 2026, interview on Arise News, where El-Rufai reportedly admitted to tapping the NSA’s phone lines. He claimed the surveillance revealed a plot by the DSS to arrest him at the Abuja airport following a trip to Cairo.

On March 2, the ICPC raided El-Rufai’s Abuja residence, reportedly recovering specialized wiretapping equipment and documents.

A major point of contention during the proceedings was the prosecution’s application to conceal the identities of two key witnesses.

The Prosecution argued that using pseudonyms is necessary to protect the witnesses and their families from potential attacks by El-Rufai’s sympathizers.

The Defence lead counsel Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, opposed the request, arguing it is a constitutional right for the accused to face his accusers. He noted there was no evidence that El-Rufai leads a “cult-like” following or poses any physical threat.

The defense team also moved to quash the charges entirely, though the prosecution urged the court to dismiss the application as meritless.

Furthermore, Iyamu objected to a request for three consecutive trial days, citing the difficulty of accessing his client. El-Rufai is currently in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) on separate matters.

Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the case until May 18, 19, and 20, when the court will rule on the pending applications and begin the trial. If convicted, the former governor faces up to three years in prison.

Continue Reading

Crime

Ex-Gov. El-Rufai Faces 5-count Amended Charge – DSS (Video)

Published

on

41 Views

The Department of State Services (DSS) has arraigned former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, on a five-count amended charge bordering on an alleged breach of national security.

‎El-Rufai, who was arraigned before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja, pleaded not guilty to all counts.

‎When the case was called, counsel to the DSS, Oluwole Aladedoye, informed the court that the matter was fixed for the defendant to take his plea.

‎Aladedoye, however, told the court that a further amended five-count charge had been filed on April 13.

‎The lawyer prayed the court to substitute it for the earlier three-count charge.

‎Responding, counsel to El-Rufai, Oluwole Iyamu, said he had been served with the amended charge and did not oppose the application.

‎The judge subsequently struck out the earlier three-count charge.

‎After the counts were read, the former governor pleaded not guilty, and Aladedoye sought three consecutive trial dates.

‎Iyamu, however, objected to the request for consecutive trial days for the commencement of trial.

‎He submitted that since the defendant had been in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), access to him within that period might be difficult.

According to him, the proposed schedule would not be in the best interest of the defence.

‎Iyamu also informed the court of a bail application filed on February 17.

‎However, the further affidavit in support of the bail application was not in the court file, prompting the judge to stand down the matter for Iyamu to address the issue.

‎Upon resumption, the further affidavit was located.

‎The DSS stated that it did not oppose the bail application.

‎The prosecution then moved an application seeking an order to conceal the identities of two witnesses expected to testify.

‎The DSS requested that:

‎• The identities of the witnesses should not appear in public court records.
‎• Pseudonyms should be used during the trial.

‎The prosecution argued that the witnesses’ families could be vulnerable to attack from persons sympathetic to El-Rufai.

‎The defence opposed the request through an application, written address, and further affidavit, urging the court to dismiss it.

‎The defence argued that it is the constitutional right of an accused person to know his accusers.

‎It further submitted that there was no evidence before the court to suggest that El-Rufai had a cult-like following or posed any threat.

‎Counsel stated that the defendant had dedicated his life to public service and warned that granting a blanket anonymity order could cause serious prejudice to the accused.

‎The defence also applied for an order directing the prosecution to furnish it with proof of evidence to prepare for trial.
‎The prosecution opposed the request through a counter-affidavit.

‎It argued that the materials sought by the defence were unrelated to the prosecution’s filed processes.

‎The defence informed the court that it had also filed an application to quash the charge.

‎• Legal arguments were raised that an application to quash cannot be brought after a plea has been taken.

‎The prosecution filed a written address urging the court to dismiss the application for lacking merit.

‎The case has been adjourned till May 18 for continuation of hearing.

Watch Video Below:

Continue Reading

Crime

Bandits storm Zamfara communities, kill 14

The bandits were said to have carried out the operation for about four hours before they left the communities.

Published

on

By

37 Views

Suspected bandits this afternoon invaded two communities in Bukkuyum Local Government Area of Zamfara State and killed fourteen people in a sporadic shooting.

Eyewitness accounts said that the bandits stormed the Rubuki and Yargalma communities on motorcycles in the afternoon and started fire sporadic gunshots as well as setting ablaze houses with occupants, vehicles and food stuff in the troubled communities.

The bandits were said to have carried out the operation for about four hours before they left the communities.

It was learned that 9 people were killed at Rubuki while five others were killed at the Yargalma community.

They left eight people with different degrees of injuries who are now receiving medical care at the hospital.

Continue Reading

Trending