Opinions
VAT Debates And The Future of Nigeria’s Federalism
By Muhammad Jibrin Barde
The ongoing Value Added Tax (VAT) debate in Nigeria exposes deeper issues about governance, fiscal responsibility, and the structure of federalism.
This debate isn’t just about revenue; it goes to the heart of how we understand and apply federal principles in the Nigerian context.
The push for a derivation-based VAT system raises critical questions about constitutional integrity, equity, and the economic realities of interdependence among states.
Amidst this discourse, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, has added a layer of inconsistency and hypocrisy to the debate.
While Oyedele acknowledges the importance of constitutional reforms, his stance on revenue-sharing mechanisms appears contradictory, prioritizing political expediency over sustainable federal principles.
Mr. Oyedele, in his capacity as a tax expert and reform advocate, has publicly emphasized the need for equity and fairness in tax administration.
However, his position on VAT appears to undermine these principles. His advocacy for a derivation-based sharing formula, particularly benefitting economically advanced states, disregards the constitutional framework and federal values of redistribution.
1.Contradictions in Equity Arguments:
Oyedele often stresses the importance of supporting less-developed regions through equitable tax policies.
Yet, his support for derivation in VAT allocation contradicts this stance, as it would disproportionately benefit wealthier states like Lagos and Rivers while marginalizing less-developed states that rely heavily on VAT allocations for public services and infrastructure.
2.Ignoring Interdependence:
VAT is a consumption tax that thrives on the interconnectedness of Nigeria’s economy.
Wealthier states benefit significantly from goods and services supplied by less-developed regions.
By advocating for derivation, Oyedele fails to acknowledge the contributions of these regions to the broader economic ecosystem.
3.Political Expediency Over Principles:
Oyedele’s position appears to align with powerful political interests rather than sound fiscal principles.
This inconsistency weakens the integrity of his broader reform agenda and raises doubts about the credibility of the committee he leads.
At the Heart of the Debate: Federalism and Revenue Allocation
The VAT debate transcends Oyedele’s inconsistencies, touching on fundamental questions about Nigeria’s federal structure:
1. Current VAT Collection and Allocation
VAT is centrally administered by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and distributed as follows:
•15% to the Federal Government,
•50% to State Governments,
•35% to Local Governments.
Allocation to states is based on population, equality, and landmass—not derivation.
This structure aligns with the revenue-sharing principles enshrined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended), ensuring redistribution to promote equitable development.
2. The Push for Derivation-Based Sharing States like Lagos and Rivers argue for a derivation-based VAT model, claiming that states generating the most VAT should retain a higher share.
However, this argument overlooks the unique nature of VAT as a consumption tax that reflects economic interdependence.
Extending the derivation principle to VAT would require a constitutional amendment.
The principle currently applies only to resource revenues, such as oil, where 13 percent is allocated to resource-producing states.
Attempting to apply it to VAT without constitutional reform undermines the legal framework of the federation.
3. Risks of a Derivation Model Introducing derivation-based VAT sharing raises serious economic and equity concerns:
•Widening Inequalities: Wealthier states would benefit disproportionately, exacerbating regional disparities and leaving less-developed states unable to meet basic developmental needs.
•Undermining Interdependence:
The interconnected nature of Nigeria’s economy means that VAT generated in one state often relies on contributions from others. A derivation model ignores this synergy.
•Threatening National Cohesion:
A derivation-based model could deepen divisions among states, fostering resentment and undermining the unity of the federation.
The Way Forward: Constitutional Reform
The VAT debate highlights the need for a comprehensive review of Nigeria’s fiscal and constitutional framework. Key steps include:
1.Clarifying Revenue Allocation Principles:
The Constitution must explicitly define how VAT revenues should be allocated, balancing fiscal autonomy with redistribution.
2.Addressing Regional Disparities:
Fiscal reforms should prioritize reducing inequalities, ensuring that all states, regardless of their economic capacity, have access to resources for development.
3.Strengthening Federalism:
The debate underscores the importance of cooperative federalism, where states recognize their interdependence and work towards shared goals.
Conclusion: Building a Fair and Sustainable Federal System
The VAT debate is not merely about tax revenue; it is a question of how we interpret and apply federal principles within our governance framework.
Changes to revenue-sharing mechanisms like VAT must emerge from a broader constitutional review that reflects the realities of Nigeria’s federal structure.
Anything short of this risks undermining the legal and institutional foundation of the federation. Mr. Oyedele’s position exemplifies the dangers of politicizing critical fiscal debates.
For Nigeria to move forward, leaders must prioritize principles over expediency, ensuring that fiscal policies promote equity, sustainability, and national cohesion.
The proper course of action is constitutional reform—not short-sighted adjustments—that uphold the integrity of our federal system and ensure equitable development for all regions.
Opinions
Setting The Record Straight on Recent False Reports About Sylva, by Julius Bokoru
While the Defence Headquarters has already debunked the swirling rumours of a coup in Nigeria, it is important to state emphatically that Chief Timipre Sylva, CON, has no involvement whatsoever—either in planning or in logistics—with any such plot.
• Timipre Sylva
In the past forty-eight hours, I have been inundated with calls from members of the press, political associates, and concerned individuals regarding a circulating report alleging that His Excellency, Chief Timipre Sylva, has “fled” the country in connection with certain purported matters.
For the avoidance of doubt, it is true that the residence of His Excellency, Chief Timipre Sylva, was recently subjected to a raid by individuals believed to be operatives of the Defence Headquarters.
During the said operation, considerable damage was inflicted upon the property.
Despite sustained efforts, I have been unable to ascertain the reasons or authorisation for this raid.
To the best of my knowledge, the officers involved did not provide any categorical explanation for their actions, either at the time or subsequently.
It is important to state unequivocally that His Excellency, Chief Timipre Sylva, and his esteemed wife, Her Excellency, Alanyingi Sylva, were both outside the country at the time of the incident.
As at my last communication with His Excellency, he was engaged in a routine medical check-up in the United Kingdom, after which he was scheduled to proceed to Malaysia to attend a professional conference.
The next development I was made aware of, regrettably, were reports circulating across social media and other platforms concerning the raid on his residence.
While the Defence Headquarters has already debunked the swirling rumours of a coup in Nigeria, it is important to state emphatically that Chief Timipre Sylva, CON, has no involvement whatsoever—either in planning or in logistics—with any such plot.
Chief Sylva is a thoroughbred democrat, whose entire political journey has been defined by his faith in democratic processes and institutions.
From the 1990s, when he was first elected into the Old Rivers State House of Assembly, to his tenure as Governor of Bayelsa State, Sylva has achieved every milestone through transparent, democratic engagement and the will of the people.
His unwavering support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a matter of public record.
It remains fresh in memory how he mobilized the entire Bayelsa APC structure to unanimously endorse President Tinubu at the APC Bayelsa Expanded Stakeholders’ Meeting.
These rumours are nothing more than the handiwork of desperate and narcissistic politicians, already consumed by ambitions for 2027, who see Sylva as their last real obstacle—a man whose political presence and credibility continue to expose their dark, self-serving ambitions.
• Julius Bokoru
Special Assistant on Media and Public Affairs to H.E. Timipre Sylva
Opinions
Those Who Sin Big, Laugh Best: A Nation’s Story of Mercy And Mischief
But in truth, this flood of forgiveness may not be entirely spiritual. Many believe it is political, a careful prelude to 2027.
By Babs Daramola
Image credit: City Arts & Lectures
Mercy, in its pure form, is one of humanity’s noblest virtues. But in Nigeria, mercy has taken a new career path: political, profitable, and proudly selective.
The gates of our prisons have opened once again, and out have walked some of the nation’s most accomplished offenders: drug barons, kidnappers, fraudsters, illegal miners, and yes, even that beautiful wife who so savagely sliced her husband’s blossom.
Her crime was passionate, her punishment heavy, but five years of some theatrics and intrigues, she too has found salvation.
The kind that comes with a presidential signature.We are told this is compassion…an exercise in humanity.
We are told it is meant to decongest our correctional centres, as though the cure for a broken roof is to burn down the house.
Yes, our prisons are overcrowded, but that is because our justice system is slow, our police corrupt, and our facilities a disgrace.
True reform begins with structure and sincerity; not with grand gestures that let the most dangerous walk free while the poor rot behind bars.
The defenders of this mercy mission insist that many of the freed have changed.
They have shown remorse, embraced morality, and in some cases, even enrolled in university programmes.
It’s inspiring, really. So perhaps this is the new gospel: repent theatrically and study strategically.
If you’re serving time, the new get-out-of-jail-free card is simple: write JAMB, attend church or mosque, quote scripture, and look remorseful on visitation days.
A little performance and a little paperwork might earn you a handshake from heaven, or at least from the presidency.
But in truth, this flood of forgiveness may not be entirely spiritual. Many believe it is political, a careful prelude to 2027.
A strategic rehearsal of compassion designed to warm hearts, build networks, and purchase goodwill long before the next election season.
And to make it look credible, a few genuinely deserving names are sprinkled among the unholy, like sugar on a bitter meal.
Never in the history of this country’s exercise of the presidential prerogative of mercy have so many drug barons, fraudsters, murderers and violent offenders been shown such lavish compassion. It is mercy on an industrial scale.
Generous, convenient, and suspiciously well-timed.It all fits neatly, of course, into the Renewed Hope Agenda. That shining slogan of our times.
Perhaps this is what renewal truly means: renewed freedom for the guilty, renewed despair for the innocent, renewed hope for every criminal who still believes in second chances; not from God, but from government.
If this is the face of hope, then despair must be taking notes.Of course, not all inmates are so fortunate.
The poor man who stole food, the woman imprisoned for a petty debt, the teenager wrongfully accused.
They will remain where they are. They have no sponsors, no connections, no access to the corridors of mercy.
In this land, forgiveness has a hierarchy. The deeper your crime, the higher your chances of redemption; provided you know someone who knows someone.
And yet, we are urged to clap. We are told that this is justice.
Maybe justice redefined. But how do you convince a grieving family that the woman who butchered their son has been “forgiven”?
How do you explain to the international community that convicted drug barons are now enjoying presidential compassion, even as the country claims to be fighting a war on drugs?
What message does that send to our youth: that crime is just ambition with bad timing?
With such highly controversial presidential pardon and clemency, Nigeria’s reputation has just bled a little more.
We make ourselves look unserious before the world. We have just upped our reputation as a nation that punishes honesty but forgives criminal brilliance.
The same government that preaches anti-corruption and moral revival has just declared open season on accountability.
Perhaps this is what renewal truly means: renewed freedom for the guilty, renewed despair for the innocent, renewed hope for every criminal who still believes in second chances; not from God, but from government.
It’s as though the war on drugs, kidnapping, and fraud were mere slogans, conveniently forgotten when the culprits are close enough to power.This is not mercy. It is mockery dressed in compassion.
It is the reckless abuse of one of the most solemn powers granted to leadership: the prerogative of mercy. That power was meant to right wrongs, to ease the pain of those unfairly convicted, or to help the truly reformed rejoin society.
It was never meant to excuse hardened offenders or to reward notoriety.But here, we have turned mercy into policy, and policy into parody.
The state now plays God, handing out forgiveness like party souvenirs.
Our prisons are not being decongested; our conscience is. We are emptying cells but filling the streets with lessons in impunity.
So, to all remaining inmates, take heart. There is still hope. Dust off your notebooks, register for JAMB, join the prison choir, and master the fine art of public repentance.
With enough effort and the right blessings, your own miracle of mercy might soon arrive.
And to the rest of us, the lesson is clear: if you must offend, offend boldly. Small crimes waste time; big crimes get attention. If you must sin, sin memorably: the kind of sin that deserves a headline and a pardon.
For in today’s Nigeria, virtue may earn you respect, but vice might just earn you release.
Mercy, they say, is divine. But in our own creed, is pardon now reserved only for the powerful and the connected — while those truly deserving rot behind the bars?
Perhaps only the politically ungrateful would fail to appreciate this fresh gospel of renewed hope, where crime meets compassion, and both walk free.
Opinions
65 Years of Nigeria’s Economic Journey, by Muda Yusuf
Nigeria’s economic history at 65 is one of resilience, missed opportunities, and enormous untapped potential.
Nigeria’s economic journey over the past 65 years has been one of profound transformation — shaped by cycles of boom and bust, far-reaching reforms, recurring crises, and enduring struggles with diversification.
As the nation marks 65 years of independence, reflecting on this trajectory is essential to chart a more sustainable, competitive, and inclusive path for the future.
Foundations and Lessons from the Early Years
At independence, Nigeria’s economy was largely agrarian, productive, and inclusive.
Agriculture contributed an estimated 60 percent of gross Domestic Product [GDP] and employed the majority of the country’s workforce.
The export economy was anchored on cash crops — cocoa, groundnuts, palm oil, and rubber — and citizens were actively engaged in the entire value chain.
Governance was decentralized, with regions controlling resources and revenues, which promoted balanced development, accountability, and healthy competition.
This early experience offers an enduring lesson: decentralization and local ownership of resources drive innovation and inclusive growth.
Restoring a more fiscally federal structure could once again foster subnational competitiveness, stimulate innovation, and encourage states and regions to take greater ownership of economic outcomes.
The Oil Boom and Structural Distortions
The discovery and commercialization of crude oil in the late 1960s radically altered Nigeria’s economic and political trajectory.
By the 1970s, oil had become the dominant source of public revenue and foreign exchange.
The oil boom delivered significant wealth but also created structural vulnerabilities.
Agriculture was neglected, leading to food import dependence.
Corruption and rent-seeking behavior escalated, while import-substitution industrialization became overly dependent on imported inputs, leaving domestic value chains underdeveloped.
This dependence made the economy acutely vulnerable to oil price shocks — a weakness that continues to destabilize public finances to this day.
The key lesson is clear: resource wealth must be managed prudently and counter cyclically through well-governed stabilization funds and sovereign wealth investments, while industrialization must be firmly rooted in domestic value chains rather than external dependence.
Nigeria has experienced eight recessions since independence — in 1967, 1975, 1978, 1981–1983, 1993, 2016, and 2020 — largely triggered by oil price shocks, fiscal mismanagement, or global crises.
Adjustment, Liberalization, and Social Costs
The oil price collapse of the early 1980s triggered fiscal and balance-of-payments crises that forced Nigeria to adopt the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) in 1986.
This shift introduced currency devaluation, trade liberalization, financial sector reform, and privatization of state-owned enterprises.
While SAP nudged Nigeria toward a market economy, it also came with significant social costs — rising poverty, inflation, and industrial underutilization. Import dependence worsened in the absence of robust domestic production.
The lesson here is that reforms must be carefully sequenced and complemented with strong institutional frameworks and social protection mechanisms to avoid deepening poverty and inequality.
Recurring Recessions and Structural Weakness
Nigeria has experienced eight recessions since independence — in 1967, 1975, 1978, 1981–1983, 1993, 2016, and 2020 — largely triggered by oil price shocks, fiscal mismanagement, or global crises.
Each downturn revealed the same structural fragilities: heavy reliance on oil revenues, weak non-oil exports, and excessive import dependence.
Building resilience will require export diversification, fiscal discipline, and the creation of credible stabilization mechanisms to ensure stability of government spending during periods of revenue volatility.
Oil and Gas Governance: From Crisis to Opportunity
For decades, Nigeria’s oil and gas sector was plagued by poor governance, corruption, and rent-seeking, leading to the collapse of state-owned refineries, heavy dependence on imported petroleum products, and widespread crude oil theft.
This mismanagement undermined fiscal stability and reduced the sector’s developmental impact.
Cheerfully, recent developments — notably the Dangote Refinery and petrochemical complex and ongoing industry reforms — signal a potential turnaround.
These efforts, if sustained, could restore value to the sector, enhance energy security, and catalyze new downstream and petrochemical investments.
Security and Productivity
The last two decades have seen a deterioration in national security — insurgency, banditry, kidnapping, ethnic and religious conflicts, farmers herders clashes and armed robbery — which disrupted agriculture, manufacturing, and mining, and eroded investor confidence.
Restoring security is therefore not just a social imperative but an economic one, necessary to rebuild productivity and unlock investment in the real economy.
Emerging Bright Spots
Despite persistent challenges, Nigeria has achieved notable successes.
The ICT and telecommunications sector has grown from fewer than 20,000 telephone lines in 1960 to over 165 million active lines today, transforming commerce, banking, and governance.
Financial services have deepened, fintech has flourished, and capital markets have expanded.
Nollywood and Afrobeats have turned Nigeria into a global cultural powerhouse.
Broadcasting has grown from one TV station and a few government-owned radio stations at independence to more than 740 broadcast stations today, while e-commerce is reshaping consumer markets.
These sectors demonstrate Nigeria’s potential for non-oil-led growth. Unlocking further progress will require strengthening infrastructure, power supply, broadband penetration, and regulatory consistency to attract and sustain private sector investment.
Macroeconomic and Fiscal Challenges
Persistent macroeconomic instability continues to weigh on growth.
The naira’s dramatic depreciation — from being stronger than the U.S. dollar in the 1970s to ₦1,600/$ in 2024 — has eroded purchasing power, raised production costs, and discouraged investment.
Rising public debt and unsustainable debt-service-to-revenue ratios have constrained the fiscal space, limiting governments’ capacity to fund critical infrastructures.
Policy priorities must focus on restoring currency stability through credible monetary policy, expanding foreign exchange supply by growing non-oil exports, improving public spending efficiency, plugging fiscal leakages, and raising non-oil revenue without stifling private enterprise.
The good news is that the economy is beginning to experience remarkable degree of stability over the last one year.
Demographics, Infrastructure, and Future Growth
Nigeria’s population of an estimated 230 million is both a significant opportunity and a daunting challenge. Infrastructure — roads, power, housing, education, and healthcare — remains grossly inadequate, undermining productivity and competitiveness.
Aggressive infrastructure investment, leveraging public-private partnerships and innovative financing models, is no longer optional but an urgent necessity.
Reform Agenda and the Way Forward
In the last two years, the government has implemented bold reforms, including exchange rate unification, fuel subsidy removal, and tax policy adjustments.
These measures have imposed short-term pain — high inflation and reduced household purchasing power — but early signs of macroeconomic stabilization are emerging.
To sustain reform momentum, these measures must be complemented by targeted social protection programs — cash transfers, food security interventions, and job-creation initiatives — to shield vulnerable households and maintain public support.Strategic Priorities for the Next Decade
Looking ahead, Nigeria must focus on:Deepening economic diversification: Scaling up value addition in agriculture, manufacturing, and solid minerals.
Strengthening governance and institutions: Enhancing transparency, reducing the cost of governance, and improving fiscal responsibility and management.
Investing in human capital: Prioritizing education, health, and vocational training to harness the demographic dividend.
Accelerating infrastructure development: Power, transport, and broadband must be prioritised through PPPs and innovative finance.
Ensuring inclusive growth:
Embedding poverty reduction, job creation, and social protection in fiscal and monetary policy.
Conclusion
Nigeria’s economic history at 65 is one of resilience, missed opportunities, and enormous untapped potential.
The current reform agenda presents a rare opportunity to reset the economy on a path of stability, competitiveness, and shared prosperity.
Seizing this moment will require consistent policies, institutional strengthening, and a deliberate effort to ensure that economic growth translates into improved living standards for citizens.
• Dr Muda Yusuf is the Director/ CEO, Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, CPPE.
-
Business2 days agoNigeria’s GDP growth not reflecting in citizens’ living standards – Sanusi
-
News2 days agoDSS Sacks 115 Officers (Photos)
-
Entertainment1 day agoRegina Daniels Declares Family Crisis, Calls Ned Nwoko Ex-Husband, Vows to Fight for Her Children [VIDEO]
-
News1 day agoChristians Killing in Nigeria: US Lashes back at China
-
Entertainment1 day agoWhy I don’t make political music – Angelique Kidjo
-
Health1 day agoFCTA Resident Doctors Acknowledge Partial Implementation of Demands, Vow to Continue Indefinite Strike
-
Business2 days agoRite Foods Mark Corporate Compliance & Ethics Week 2025
-
News1 day agoLocal Contractors Protest at N/Assembly over debts
