Connect with us

News

Tribunal: Atiku, PDP Indicates Plans To Call 100 Witnesses

Published

on

836 Views

Both the Peoples Democratic Party and it’s candidate, Atiku Abubakar are challenging the declaration of the President-elect, Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), in the February 25 election.

Both PDP and Atiku have indicated plans to call “not more than 100 witnesses” to the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal.

Counsel for Atiku and the PDP, Chris Uche, addressing the court in Abuja on Saturday, said all the parties had met, and considered and agreed on the numbers of witnesses, duration and examination of witnesses.

Uche added that though the new time given them to call the witnesses is seven weeks, they would need three weeks, since the issues were getting narrower.

All the parties in the suit agreed to streamline the numbers of witnesses as well as the duration of each party to call witnesses.

For the evidence in chief, they categorised them into 30 minutes for the lead witness because they will tender and identify documents.

They also proposed 15 minutes for each respondent for cross-examination and five minutes for re-examination of the lead witness of the petitioners. In addition, 10 minutes was proposed for other witnesses of the petitioners, as well as 10 minutes for cross-examination of these witnesses, by the respondents.

The star witnesses of the respondents — the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Tinubu and the APC — 30 minutes was proposed, while 30 minutes was proposed for cross-examination of the respondents’ witness, by the respondents.

INEC said it has two witnesses that will testify, while the counsel to President -elect said it had 39 witnesses ready.

For the President-elect, the report of any star witness should be made available 48 hours before hearing.

The schedule of documents to be filed must be given to other parties before the hearing and calling of witnesses.

Examination of experts/star witnesses was fixed for 20 minutes, while cross-examination by respondents was scheduled for 30 minutes. Re-examination was fixed at five minutes.

Furthermore, examination of non-experts/star witness was scheduled for 10 minutes; cross-examination, 15 minutes; and re-examination at five minutes.

The same applies for the APC. The only difference is the number of witnesses — it has 25 witnesses set to testify.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

JUST IN: A’Court Stalls SERAP, Oluwadare Defamation Appeals Over Late Briefs

Published

on

18 Views

The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Friday stalled the hearing of two appeals filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, against a ₦101 million judgment debt.

The appeals challenge the May 5 judgment of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which held that SERAP and Oluwadare defamed two Department of State Services (DSS) officials through a false publication on September 10, 2024.

A three-member panel led by Justice Danlami Senchi first took the SERAP appeal marked CA/ABJ/CV/1114/2026. When the related appeal by Oluwadare (CA/ABJ/CV/1105/2026) was called, counsel Hannah Ayanwale informed the court that it was not ripe for hearing. She said the appellant’s brief was only filed on Thursday and served on the respondents in court on Friday morning, just before sitting began.

The justices expressed displeasure that the court had not been informed earlier that the sister appeal was not ready. Because both appeals arose from the same judgment, the panel set aside the proceedings already conducted on the SERAP appeal and ordered that the two matters be heard together.

The court adjourned both appeals to October 13. It directed the respondents to file their briefs by October 12 and the appellants to file any reply briefs before the next sitting.

In the May 5 judgment, Justice Halilu Yusuf of the FCT High Court found that SERAP and Oluwadare made false claims on the organisation’s website and social media platforms alleging that DSS officials Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024, and subjected staff to harassment.

The judge held that the claimants established all the ingredients of defamation. He rejected the defence of justification, noting that the defendants admitted at trial that the DSS officials did not forcibly enter the premises or brandish weapons. Words such as “invasion,” “forceful entry” and “harassment” were therefore used inaccurately.

Justice Yusuf ruled that the publications injured the claimants’ professional reputation and standing. He awarded ₦100 million in damages and ₦1 million as costs, ordered a public apology to be published on SERAP’s website, its X handle, two national newspapers and two television stations, and directed that the judgment sum attract 10 per cent interest per annum until fully paid.

Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Omi Eko Project Debunks Claims of Zero Progress

Published

on

18 Views

The Omi Eko Project Management has dismissed as misleading a circulating online report claiming that no physical infrastructure has been delivered seven months after the project’s kick-off.

In a statement signed by Dr. Segun Alabi, Head of Communications and Media, the management said the narrative fails to recognise the established processes required for a project of this scale and complexity.

The Omi Eko Project is being implemented in line with global best practices for major infrastructure development. These involve a structured progression through planning and procurement, design, infrastructure development, implementation, and evaluation phases. Such preparatory stages are essential to ensure the project is technically sound, financially responsible, environmentally sustainable, and capable of delivering its intended benefits.

“The absence of visible physical structures at an early stage should therefore not be misconstrued as an absence of progress,” the statement noted. Infrastructure projects of this magnitude require extensive technical assessments, detailed engineering designs, procurement processes, stakeholder engagement, and other essential groundwork before major construction activities begin.

The Omi Eko Project is a transformative initiative aimed at modernising Lagos State’s waterways transportation system. It is being pursued with a long-term vision of delivering a safer, more efficient, and environmentally sustainable transport network for residents.

Project management urged the public and media practitioners to verify information through official channels rather than circulating narratives that could misrepresent the implementation process. It reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, accountability, and the successful delivery of the project for the benefit of Lagosians.

Continue Reading

News

South African Human Rights Lawyer, Navi Pillay, Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize •”It must be a joke,”she reacts

The Nobel Prizes come with a financial award, which this year is 12 million Swedish kronor per prize, or about $1.2 million.

Published

on

By

26 Views

The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced on Friday the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize winner is Navi Pillay, a South African human rights lawyer.

Pillay is recognised for her “efforts to promote peace and international law”, the Norwegian Nobel Committee says.

After being told she has won, Pillay jokes that she doesn’t quite believe the news is real, going on to have a jibe at the US president: “If you clap a little bit more I may share this prize with Trump”

Ms. Pillay, formerly the United Nations’ top human rights official, also served as a judge at the International Criminal Court and on an international tribunal investigating the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

Last year, a United Nations commission led by Ms. Pillay determined that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, a finding that the Israeli government rejected.

“This year’s laureate has been instrumental in ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are prosecuted,” the Nobel committee said in a statement.

The prize is awarded annually to a person or organization that has advanced “fraternity between nations,” worked toward disarmament or promoted peace conferences, according to the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, the creator of the prize.

Over time the criteria for selection have expanded to include other areas, including championing human rights and environmental protections.

The Nobel Prizes come with a financial award, which this year is 12 million Swedish kronor per prize, or about $1.2 million.

Last year, the Nobel Peace Prize went to María Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader, for her efforts to advance democracy “in the face of ever-expanding authoritarianism” in the country, according to the Nobel committee.

In January, Ms. Machado presented her medal to President Trump after U.S. troops captured Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s president.

The Norwegian Nobel Institute said the award itself cannot be transferred.

Continue Reading

Trending