Connect with us

Business

BREAKING: Interest Rate, Increase to 15-Year High – Bank Of England

Published

on

770 Views

The Bank of England on Thursday lifted its key interest rate to the highest level since the 2008 financial crisis, noting inflation remained stubbornly high but that the economy would now avoid recession this year.

The BoE hiked the rate by a quarter-point to 4.5 percent — its 12th increase in a row with UK annual inflation stuck above 10 percent, fuelling a cost-of-living crisis across Britain.

Global policymakers are battling elevated inflation caused largely by runaway energy bills following last year’s invasion of Ukraine by major oil and gas producer Russia.

Following a regular policy meeting, the BoE warned of “considerable uncertainties” on when UK inflation would return to its two-percent target, as soaring food prices offset sharp drops to energy costs.

At the same time, the central bank made a record upgrade to its British GDP forecast, adding there would be only a small impact from recent turmoil in the commercial banking sector.

“Six months ago, we were expecting a shallow but long recession,” BoE governor Andrew Bailey told a press conference.

“Since then, energy prices have fallen substantially and economic activity is holding up much better than expected.”

– ‘Modest but positive’ growth –

Bailey said the UK would this year experience “modest but positive economic growth and a much smaller increase in unemployment.

“We think inflation will fall quite sharply over the coming months,” he added.

Official data Friday is expected to show the UK economy grew during the first quarter of this year after narrowly avoiding recession in the last three months of 2022.

The rate decision comes one week after UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s Conservative government suffered a drubbing in local elections, as voters gave their verdict over rampant living costs despite government efforts to partly subsidise energy bills.

The nation has been plagued by strikes as high inflation erodes the value of wages. Train staff will walk out again on Friday following months of industrial action across the private and public sectors.

The latest BoE hike is set to deepen the crunch in living standards as retail banks pass on the increase, resulting in higher repayments on loans, including mortgages.

At the same time, those who can afford to save will benefit for increased fixed returns on investments.

“Although it is good news that the Bank of England is no longer forecasting recession, today’s interest rate rise will obviously be very disappointing for families with mortgages,” said British finance minister Jeremy Hunt.

– Highest inflation in G7 –

Thursday’s news took British borrowing costs to a level last seen in October 2008, before rates were slashed during the global financial crisis.

The BoE has ramped up borrowing costs from a record-low of 0.1 percent in December 2021.

Its latest hike came one week after the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve implemented quarter-point rate increases as inflationary pressures ease only slightly in the eurozone and the United States.

UK annual inflation stood at 10.1 percent in March, the highest level in the Group of Seven richest nations.

Sunak and the BoE blame the high level in part on rises to pay and have urged employers to show restraint.

BoE chief economist Huw Pill recently stated that Britons need “to accept that they’re worse off and stop trying to maintain their real spending power by bidding up prices via higher wages”.

AFP

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigeria Is Practically Comatose – ADC, Tasks NASS, Onanuga

If borrowing is truly for development, let President Tinubu show Nigerians one tangible project his administration has delivered with its trillions of naira in loans, beyond the solar farm in the Presidential Villa.

Published

on

By

28 Views

The African Democratic Congress Presidential Campaign Council (ADC-PCC) said on Friday Nigeria is practically comatose in all aspects, declaring that history will not forgive the 10th National Assembly if it stands by while the country is plunged deeper into a cycle of unsustainable indebtedness.

Kola Ologbondiyan
Director, Media and Publicity
ADC PCC, was reacting to statement credited to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, through his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, declaring that “The Question Is What We Build, Not How Much We Borrow.”

The ADC-PCC challenged President Tinubu to identify what his administration has actually built with the mountain of loans it has accumulated since he assumed office in 2023 insisting that Nigerians have seen little or no tangible returns on the country’s growing debt burden.

Ologbondiyan said it was particularly disturbing that Mr Onanuga would attempt to dress the President in borrowed garments by speaking about infrastructure and development when, according to the ADC-PCC, the administration has failed to demonstrate commensurate achievements despite unprecedented borrowing.

He alleged that the only visible project associated with the administration’s concern for electricity is a solar farm installed to guarantee power supply within the comfort of the Presidential Villa, while millions of Nigerians continue to grapple with unreliable electricity.

Ologbondiyan pointed out that “For three and a half wasted years, Tinubu government has borrowed without restraint and built nothing. No value, no legacy, no impact.

“Except for projects inherited from the late President Muhammadu Buhari, many of the projects being advertised by the Tinubu administration are nothing but audio projects.

They exist only on paper, as conceptual designs or as announcements on newspaper pages and television screens.

“Under Tinubu, virtually every project exists in a press statement.
“Where is the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway? Where is the Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway?

Where is the Trans-Sahara Superhighway? Where are the promised electricity grid upgrades? All propaganda, no commensurate progress, just media hype from Bayo Onanuga and his team.

“Even the Abuja-Kaduna-Kano Highway, awarded more than eight years ago, remains a source of concern to motorists. Its prolonged construction and delays tell the story of APC governance.

“Mr President must wake up and confront the reality facing Nigerians, if there is still left between now and January 16.

Citizens are hungry and enduring excruciating hardship. People are dying from hunger, insecurity and deprivation, while the government remains preoccupied with propaganda and self-congratulatory statements.


“These are the real signposts of what the Tinubu administration has built in almost four years.

“Today, ministries are barely functioning, agencies are struggling, and critical directorates are failing to deliver. Nigeria is practically comatose.

“The Tinubu Presidency came into power without a convincing blueprint or workable ideas and, after almost four years, has offered Nigerians little beyond failure, hardship, poverty and insecurity.

“If borrowing is truly for development, let President Tinubu show Nigerians one tangible project his administration has delivered with its trillions of naira in loans, beyond the solar farm in the Presidential Villa.

“The only thing this administration has successfully built is hardship.
“We appeal to international donors, development partners and financial institutions to exercise greater scrutiny and insist on accountability, transparency and prudence before extending further loans to Nigeria.
“Borrowing is not inherently wrong when the benefits translate into improved living conditions for citizens. What is unacceptable is a situation in which the country continues to accumulate debts without corresponding benefits for the people.
“Nigerians must not be compelled to continue financing the luxury, proligacy and privileged lifestyle of those in power while ordinary citizens wallow in poverty.

“Future generations should not be burdened with debts incurred without demonstrable benefits to them.

“The National Assembly must rise to its constitutional responsibility and save the country from being mortgaged through indiscriminate borrowings. It must stop acting as a rubber stamp for every loan request and defend the economic future of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Business

Trustfund rebranding to PT Pensions

“While our name is set to change, our commitment to you remains steadfast,” said the statement.

Published

on

By

29 Views

Trustfund Pensions Limited and Premium Pensions Limited have approached the final stages of their merger and integration, as Premium Trustfund Pensions Limited (PT Pensions).

This is disclosed in its latest Newsletter emailed to its customers across the country .

” While our name is set to change, our commitment to you remains steadfast,” said the statement.

Continue Reading

Business

Who Owns Temu? Inside PDD Holdings and Its Business

The “Shop Like a Billionaire” slogan promotes affordable abundance, but the practical distinction is simple: The platform owner and the seller of a particular product aren’t necessarily the same company.

Published

on

By

33 Views

If you’re wondering who owns Temu, the answer is PDD Holdings Inc., the parent company behind both Temu and Pinduoduo.

But that doesn’t mean one person owns the shopping platform outright: PDD Holdings is a publicly traded company with many shareholders.

Howstuffworks reported that the corporate ownership becomes clearer when you separate three things: the shopping brand, the companies operating it and the holding company above them.

How PDD Holdings Owns Temu

Think of PDD Holdings as the corporate umbrella.

Temu and Pinduoduo are separate e-commerce platforms within that group, not two names for the same storefront. Pinduoduo serves the Chinese market, while Temu targets shoppers internationally.

The parent completed its initial public offering in July 2018 as Pinduoduo Inc. It changed its name to PDD Holdings Inc. in February 2023.

Today, PDD stock trades on Nasdaq under the ticker PDD; the U.S.-listed securities are American depositary shares, each representing four Class A ordinary shares.

Buying those securities gives investors an interest in the parent, not a separately listed Temu business.

To understand major shareholders, institutional investors and voting rights, consult the company’s SEC filings.

Share ownership and voting power aren’t necessarily identical.

Where Colin Huang Fits In

Colin Huang, also known as Huang Zheng, founded Pinduoduo in 2015.

The company founder stepped down as chief executive officer in July 2020, when Chen Lei succeeded him, and left the chairman’s role in March 2021. Both departures came before PDD Holdings introduced Temu in September 2022.

That timing matters: Huang founded the business from which the group developed, but describing him as Temu’s sole owner confuses company history with corporate ownership.

Why Temu Has Several Geographic Connections

The corporate structure spans several jurisdictions. PDD Holdings has Cayman Islands incorporation, while its 2024 annual report identifies its principal executive offices in Dublin, Ireland. A legal home and company headquarters can be different places.

Whaleco Inc., a Delaware-incorporated subsidiary within the group, operates Temu in the United States.

Temu has described Boston, Massachusetts, as its base. Whaleco Technology Limited, an Irish group company, operates Temu in certain other markets.

None of those addresses erases the group’s Chinese roots. They describe different pieces of an international business, rather than competing answers to who owns it.

What Temu’s Marketplace Actually Does

Temu’s 2022 U.S. launch began its global expansion. Its business model centers on an online marketplace connecting shoppers with third-party sellers, including Chinese manufacturers and merchants, rather than manufacturing everything itself. Cross-border e-commerce — selling goods across national borders — helped underpin that growth.

The “Shop Like a Billionaire” slogan promotes affordable abundance, but the practical distinction is simple: The platform owner and the seller of a particular product aren’t necessarily the same company.

Source: Howstuffworks

Continue Reading

Trending