The Pan-African Manufacturers Association (PAMA) has attributed the rising prices of cement in Nigeria to a combination of production, energy, foreign exchange, financing and distribution challenges confronting manufacturers.

As of October 2026, the retail price of a standard 50kg bag of cement in Nigeria generally ranges between ₦11,000 and ₦15,000, depending on the brand, location and volume purchased.

While Dangote Cement sells between ₦12,000 and ₦15,000 per bag, BUA Cement goes for between ₦11,500 and ₦14,500. Lafarge Africa (HBM) sells between ₦10,500 and ₦13,500.

Co-Interim Secretary-General of PAMA, Segun Ajayi-Kadir, explained that cement manufacturers face numerous production and distribution challenges, which contribute significantly to the rising prices of the commodity across the country.

According to him, beyond tariffs, infrastructure deficits, exchange-rate volatility and high interest rates, cement manufacturing is inherently energy-intensive, capital-intensive and relatively expensive to transport.

“Raw materials are often locally available, but energy, maintenance, equipment, logistics and finance can materially affect the economics of production. Scale also matters because fixed costs must be spread across sufficient output,” he said.

Using Dangote Cement as a case study, Ajayi-Kadir disclosed that the company operates in about 11 African countries, with an installed production capacity of 55 million tonnes.

In 2025, the company produced 26.79 million tonnes and sold 27.47 million tonnes of cement and clinker.

Energy Costs Drive Manufacturing Expenses

An examination of the company’s financial statements provides an insight into the cost pressures confronting cement manufacturers.

Dangote Cement’s manufacturing costs stood at ₦1.634 trillion in 2025, with fuel and power accounting for ₦681.9 billion, representing approximately 42 per cent of total manufacturing expenses.

Materials accounted for about 24 per cent, plant maintenance 10 per cent, salaries and related expenses nine per cent, while depreciation and amortisation represented another nine per cent.

Using the 2025 average official exchange rate of approximately ₦1,555 to the dollar, the company’s total manufacturing costs amounted to roughly $1.05 billion, equivalent to about $39 per tonne produced.

Fuel and power alone accounted for approximately $439 million, or $16.4 per tonne.

The figures underscore the significant influence of energy costs on cement production.

For instance, a 20 per cent increase in fuel and power expenses, assuming other variables remain unchanged, would add approximately $88 million to the company’s manufacturing costs, equivalent to an additional $3.3 per tonne.

This would increase manufacturing costs per tonne by approximately eight per cent.

The implication is that addressing energy costs requires more than reducing electricity tariffs. Manufacturers must also explore energy efficiency, alternative fuels, captive power generation, improved production processes and a more diversified energy mix.

Ultimately, reliable and affordable energy remains essential to competitive industrial production.

Foreign Exchange and Local Sourcing

Foreign-exchange exposure is another major consideration.

Dangote Cement operates across several African countries with different currencies, while its consolidated financial statements are reported in naira.

Consequently, imported machinery, spare parts and other production inputs expose the company to exchange-rate fluctuations, which can increase operating costs.

However, the company’s procurement strategy offers an indication of how local sourcing can help reduce such exposure.

In 2024, more than 75 per cent of its procurement expenditure went to local vendors, reflecting efforts to reduce import dependence and foreign-exchange risks.

Nevertheless, local sourcing can only improve manufacturing competitiveness when domestic suppliers are capable of delivering quality materials at competitive prices and in sufficient quantities.

The priority, therefore, should be to develop competitive domestic supplier networks and strengthen local productive capacity rather than merely replacing imports without building the necessary industrial capabilities.

Transportation and Distribution Challenges

Logistics also play a significant role in determining the final price of cement.

Dangote Cement’s 2025 administration and selling expenses increased to ₦943.9 billion, with higher haulage costs identified as a major contributing factor.

Given the weight and bulk of cement, transportation costs are particularly significant. Factory locations, road infrastructure, access to ports, proximity to raw materials and distance to major consumer markets all influence the final delivered price.

The company’s expansion across African markets also illustrates the importance of production location in reducing distribution costs.

Its three-million-tonne-per-annum grinding plant in Côte d’Ivoire, commissioned in 2025, increased its group production capacity to 55 million tonnes.

The facility sold 60,400 tonnes during its initial production ramp-up period.

The investment demonstrates how establishing production facilities closer to regional markets can improve supply efficiency and reduce dependence on transporting products over long distances from a single production base.

The Policy Imperatives

The cost structure of cement manufacturing highlights the need for a more targeted industrial policy response.

Governments should prioritise reliable and affordable industrial energy, efficient road and port infrastructure, predictable foreign-exchange and trade policies, access to long-term industrial financing and the development of competitive domestic suppliers.

Regional economic integration also offers opportunities to improve manufacturing efficiency by enabling companies to access larger markets, increase production volumes and achieve economies of scale.

For Nigeria, the challenge goes beyond making cement available at affordable prices. It involves creating an industrial environment in which manufacturers can produce competitively, expand capacity, invest in technology and deliver products to consumers at reasonable costs.

Rather than relying excessively on incentives, policymakers must address the underlying structural constraints driving production and distribution expenses.

Reducing these costs is essential not only to making cement more affordable but also to supporting construction, infrastructure development, housing delivery and Nigeria’s broader industrialisation agenda.

The African Democratic Congress Presidential Campaign Council (ADC-PCC) said on Friday Nigeria is practically comatose in all aspects, declaring that history will not forgive the 10th National Assembly if it stands by while the country is plunged deeper into a cycle of unsustainable indebtedness.

Kola Ologbondiyan
Director, Media and Publicity
ADC PCC, was reacting to statement credited to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, through his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, declaring that “The Question Is What We Build, Not How Much We Borrow.”

The ADC-PCC challenged President Tinubu to identify what his administration has actually built with the mountain of loans it has accumulated since he assumed office in 2023 insisting that Nigerians have seen little or no tangible returns on the country’s growing debt burden.

Ologbondiyan said it was particularly disturbing that Mr Onanuga would attempt to dress the President in borrowed garments by speaking about infrastructure and development when, according to the ADC-PCC, the administration has failed to demonstrate commensurate achievements despite unprecedented borrowing.

He alleged that the only visible project associated with the administration’s concern for electricity is a solar farm installed to guarantee power supply within the comfort of the Presidential Villa, while millions of Nigerians continue to grapple with unreliable electricity.

Ologbondiyan pointed out that “For three and a half wasted years, Tinubu government has borrowed without restraint and built nothing. No value, no legacy, no impact.

“Except for projects inherited from the late President Muhammadu Buhari, many of the projects being advertised by the Tinubu administration are nothing but audio projects.

They exist only on paper, as conceptual designs or as announcements on newspaper pages and television screens.

“Under Tinubu, virtually every project exists in a press statement.
“Where is the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway? Where is the Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway?

Where is the Trans-Sahara Superhighway? Where are the promised electricity grid upgrades? All propaganda, no commensurate progress, just media hype from Bayo Onanuga and his team.

“Even the Abuja-Kaduna-Kano Highway, awarded more than eight years ago, remains a source of concern to motorists. Its prolonged construction and delays tell the story of APC governance.

“Mr President must wake up and confront the reality facing Nigerians, if there is still left between now and January 16.

Citizens are hungry and enduring excruciating hardship. People are dying from hunger, insecurity and deprivation, while the government remains preoccupied with propaganda and self-congratulatory statements.

“These are the real signposts of what the Tinubu administration has built in almost four years.

“Today, ministries are barely functioning, agencies are struggling, and critical directorates are failing to deliver. Nigeria is practically comatose.

“The Tinubu Presidency came into power without a convincing blueprint or workable ideas and, after almost four years, has offered Nigerians little beyond failure, hardship, poverty and insecurity.

“If borrowing is truly for development, let President Tinubu show Nigerians one tangible project his administration has delivered with its trillions of naira in loans, beyond the solar farm in the Presidential Villa.

“The only thing this administration has successfully built is hardship.
“We appeal to international donors, development partners and financial institutions to exercise greater scrutiny and insist on accountability, transparency and prudence before extending further loans to Nigeria.
“Borrowing is not inherently wrong when the benefits translate into improved living conditions for citizens. What is unacceptable is a situation in which the country continues to accumulate debts without corresponding benefits for the people.
“Nigerians must not be compelled to continue financing the luxury, proligacy and privileged lifestyle of those in power while ordinary citizens wallow in poverty.

“Future generations should not be burdened with debts incurred without demonstrable benefits to them.

“The National Assembly must rise to its constitutional responsibility and save the country from being mortgaged through indiscriminate borrowings. It must stop acting as a rubber stamp for every loan request and defend the economic future of Nigeria.

Trustfund Pensions Limited and Premium Pensions Limited have approached the final stages of their merger and integration, as Premium Trustfund Pensions Limited (PT Pensions).

This is disclosed in its latest Newsletter emailed to its customers across the country .

” While our name is set to change, our commitment to you remains steadfast,” said the statement.