Connect with us

Opinions

VAT Debates And The Future of Nigeria’s Federalism

Published

on

5 Views

By Muhammad Jibrin Barde

The ongoing Value Added Tax (VAT) debate in Nigeria exposes deeper issues about governance, fiscal responsibility, and the structure of federalism.

This debate isn’t just about revenue; it goes to the heart of how we understand and apply federal principles in the Nigerian context.

The push for a derivation-based VAT system raises critical questions about constitutional integrity, equity, and the economic realities of interdependence among states.

Amidst this discourse, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, has added a layer of inconsistency and hypocrisy to the debate.

While Oyedele acknowledges the importance of constitutional reforms, his stance on revenue-sharing mechanisms appears contradictory, prioritizing political expediency over sustainable federal principles.

Mr. Oyedele, in his capacity as a tax expert and reform advocate, has publicly emphasized the need for equity and fairness in tax administration.

However, his position on VAT appears to undermine these principles. His advocacy for a derivation-based sharing formula, particularly benefitting economically advanced states, disregards the constitutional framework and federal values of redistribution.

1.Contradictions in Equity Arguments:

Oyedele often stresses the importance of supporting less-developed regions through equitable tax policies.

Yet, his support for derivation in VAT allocation contradicts this stance, as it would disproportionately benefit wealthier states like Lagos and Rivers while marginalizing less-developed states that rely heavily on VAT allocations for public services and infrastructure.

2.Ignoring Interdependence:

VAT is a consumption tax that thrives on the interconnectedness of Nigeria’s economy.

Wealthier states benefit significantly from goods and services supplied by less-developed regions.

By advocating for derivation, Oyedele fails to acknowledge the contributions of these regions to the broader economic ecosystem.

3.Political Expediency Over Principles:

Oyedele’s position appears to align with powerful political interests rather than sound fiscal principles.

This inconsistency weakens the integrity of his broader reform agenda and raises doubts about the credibility of the committee he leads.

At the Heart of the Debate: Federalism and Revenue Allocation

The VAT debate transcends Oyedele’s inconsistencies, touching on fundamental questions about Nigeria’s federal structure:

1. Current VAT Collection and Allocation

VAT is centrally administered by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and distributed as follows:

•15% to the Federal Government,

•50% to State Governments,

•35% to Local Governments.

Allocation to states is based on population, equality, and landmass—not derivation.

This structure aligns with the revenue-sharing principles enshrined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended), ensuring redistribution to promote equitable development.

2. The Push for Derivation-Based Sharing States like Lagos and Rivers argue for a derivation-based VAT model, claiming that states generating the most VAT should retain a higher share.

However, this argument overlooks the unique nature of VAT as a consumption tax that reflects economic interdependence.

Extending the derivation principle to VAT would require a constitutional amendment.

The principle currently applies only to resource revenues, such as oil, where 13 percent is allocated to resource-producing states.

Attempting to apply it to VAT without constitutional reform undermines the legal framework of the federation.

3. Risks of a Derivation Model Introducing derivation-based VAT sharing raises serious economic and equity concerns:

•Widening Inequalities: Wealthier states would benefit disproportionately, exacerbating regional disparities and leaving less-developed states unable to meet basic developmental needs.

•Undermining Interdependence:

The interconnected nature of Nigeria’s economy means that VAT generated in one state often relies on contributions from others. A derivation model ignores this synergy.

•Threatening National Cohesion:

A derivation-based model could deepen divisions among states, fostering resentment and undermining the unity of the federation.

The Way Forward: Constitutional Reform

The VAT debate highlights the need for a comprehensive review of Nigeria’s fiscal and constitutional framework. Key steps include:

1.Clarifying Revenue Allocation Principles:

The Constitution must explicitly define how VAT revenues should be allocated, balancing fiscal autonomy with redistribution.

2.Addressing Regional Disparities:

Fiscal reforms should prioritize reducing inequalities, ensuring that all states, regardless of their economic capacity, have access to resources for development.

3.Strengthening Federalism:

The debate underscores the importance of cooperative federalism, where states recognize their interdependence and work towards shared goals.

Conclusion: Building a Fair and Sustainable Federal System

The VAT debate is not merely about tax revenue; it is a question of how we interpret and apply federal principles within our governance framework.

Changes to revenue-sharing mechanisms like VAT must emerge from a broader constitutional review that reflects the realities of Nigeria’s federal structure.

Anything short of this risks undermining the legal and institutional foundation of the federation. Mr. Oyedele’s position exemplifies the dangers of politicizing critical fiscal debates.

For Nigeria to move forward, leaders must prioritize principles over expediency, ensuring that fiscal policies promote equity, sustainability, and national cohesion.

The proper course of action is constitutional reform—not short-sighted adjustments—that uphold the integrity of our federal system and ensure equitable development for all regions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

One Million Teachers (1MT) Sparks National Policy Conversation with Transformative Education Model

Let There Be Teachers” Conference is expected to gather over 60,000 teachers—the largest congregation of educators ever on African soil.

Published

on

By

21 Views

At a time when Nigeria’s education system faces unprecedented challenges, 1 Million Teachers (1MT) is offering not just hope—but a proven, homegrown solution.

With an ambitious vision to train and empower one million teachers across underserved communities, 1MT is redefining how education can transform society by placing teachers at the heart of national development.

Rooted in the belief that empowered teachers are the foundation of any thriving society, 1MT’s model has already reached over 100,000 educators across Africa. Its bold target?

One million teachers within five years—creating a ripple effect that will impact millions of learners and entire communities.

A Multi-Pronged Strategy Anchored in Innovation 1MT’s growth is built on five core pillars:

• Blended Learning: A hybrid training model combining online courses with offline community hubs for maximum reach.

• Gamified Teacher Development: The 1MT Blackbelt Program motivates teachers to grow through a merit-based, badge-earning system.

• Community Mentorship: Graduates become mentors, creating self-reinforcing networks of leadership and support.

• Strategic Global Partnerships: Collaborations with institutions like Queen’s University, HP, and Girl Rising extend 1MT’s footprint and credibility.

• Anchor Schools: Designated excellence hubs that serve as real-world laboratories for pedagogy and innovation.

The 1MT Village: Turning Vision into Tangible ChangeMore than just a campus, the 312-acre 1MT Village is a living, breathing demonstration of what happens when visionary thinking meets localised, Afrocentric action.

The Village serves as the “flywheel” of the 1MT mission—its engine room and proving ground.

• A Talent Pipeline: It houses the Centre for Teaching Excellence, Blackbelt educator residencies, the Green School, and a vocational institute—all designed to nurture future education leaders.

• A Regenerative Revenue Model: With businesses in agriculture, tourism, and cultural enterprise, the Village funds its growth sustainably.

• A Magnet for Global Collaboration: Donors, researchers, government officials, and major brands like HP and Mastercard Foundation are drawn to its tangible impact.

• A Policy Laboratory: The Village tests and demonstrates education reforms—from curriculum co-creation to budget simulations—grounded in local realities and teacher leadership.

As Nigeria seeks answers to its educational crisis, 1 Million Teachers are not waiting for change.

Let There Be Teachers’ Conference:

National Advocacy on a Global Stage Slated for September 20, 2025, at Tafawa Balewa Square, Lagos, the “Let There Be Teachers” Conference is expected to gather over 60,000 teachers—the largest congregation of educators ever on African soil.

Aiming for a Guinness World Record, the event is more than symbolic; it’s strategic.

The conference will spotlight the 1MT Blackbelt Graduation—a celebration of master educators trained through the 1MT model—and push for policy reforms including:

• Teacher-led education ministries.• Increased education funding

• Higher entry standards for teacher colleges

• Curriculum design co-owned by teachers.

• Official recognition of October 5 (World Teachers’ Day) as a national holiday.

One Movement, Many Voices

The synergy of 1MT, the Village, and the Conference is no accident. Together, they form a powerful ecosystem:

• 1MT is the heart—training teachers with world-class tools.

• The Village is the body—housing the mission in a living curriculum.

The Conference is the voice—speaking truth to power and the world.

As Nigeria seeks answers to its educational crisis, 1 Million Teachers are not waiting for change.

It is building it—acre by acre, teacher by teacher, voice by voice.Let there be teachers. Let them breathe. Let them lead.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Who Will Bell The Cat? By Emeka Monye

Whether we belong to one religious group, political party or ethnicity is inconsequential because the harsh economy is hitting hard on everyone.

Published

on

By

23 Views

The phrase “Who will bell the cat?” originates from a medieval fable about mice who decided to put a bell on a cat to warn them of its approach.

However, they realize that the difficult part is finding a volunteer to actually bell the cat.

The story is a classic fable that teaches a valuable lesson about courage, responsibility, and the challenges of implementing a good idea.

In modern usage, the phrase is often used metaphorically to ask who will take bold action or assume responsibility for a difficult or risky task.

In the story, a group of mice gather to discuss ways to protect themselves from a sly cat that has been terrorizing them.

One clever mouse suggests attaching a bell to the cat’s neck, so the mice can hear it coming and scurry to safety.

The plan seems brilliant, but when the mice are asked who will actually bell the cat, no one volunteers.

Here lies the challenge, everyone was scared of being the victim. The mice realize that it’s easy to propose a plan, but much harder to put it into action, especially when it involves risk.

This fable highlights the importance of considering the practicalities and potential consequences of a plan, as well as the need for courage and willingness to take action.

This is the reality we have found ourselves in modern day Nigeria.

Everyone is complaining, complaining and lamenting about the harsh economic and political disequilibrium, yet no one is bold enough or has summoned the gut to take charge and offer a real solution to the present socio-economic quagmire.

Every day on various social media, the ranting is hitting the high heavens, ceilings are being shattered and walls are being broken by people, mostly the common man, about the state of affairs in the country.

Unfortunately, and like the proverbial mice, no one seems to have summoned the courage to face the Intimidators of the large chunk of the people.

Many of those caught in this web of animal oppression have been divided along fault lines, including politics, tribe, ethnicity and worst of all, religion.

Whether we belong to one religious group, political party or ethnicity is inconsequential because the harsh economy is hitting hard on everyone.

Everyone is complaining, complaining and lamenting about the harsh economic and political disequilibrium, yet no one is bold enough or has summoned the gut to take charge and offer a real solution to the present socio-economic quagmire.

People are on a daily basis dropping dead, either by committing suicide or accidental, because they cannot afford the basic needs of life such as food.

While the political leaders have been fingered as the architect of this present economic circumstance, the reality existing among the followers who in this context can be likened to the mice, is that most of them have not been able to summon the courage to take action.

At best what we hear is false courage on social media, people hiding under pseudonyms to call on unsuspecting and naive Nigerians to go out and cause mayhem, yet these same faceless groups of people oftentimes turn around to betray the people’s trust.

And When groups or individuals in positions of power prioritize their own interests over the trust placed on them, it can lead to feelings of betrayal and disillusionment.

This phenomenon can be seen in various contexts, including politics, business, and social movements.

When leaders or representatives fail to uphold their responsibilities or act with integrity, it can erode trust and undermine the relationships between those in power and the people they serve.

To mitigate these risks, it’s essential to establish robust systems of accountability, transparency, and checks and balances.

This can help ensure that those in power act in the best interests of the people they serve and not make them live like the proverbial MICE seeking for a VOLUNTEER to bell the CAT

Emeka Monye Is A Journalist And Works With ARISE NEWS

Continue Reading

Opinions

Macron Got Slapped And the World Laughed, This is Why Men Don’t Report Abuse, By Halima Layeni

If the roles were reversed, if President Macron had slapped or pushed Brigitte Macron, there would be protests.

Published

on

By

24 Views

Earlier today, a clip surfaced online showing French President Emmanuel Macron being pushed on the cheek by his wife, Brigitte Macron.

What should have sparked outrage, concern, and deep conversations around domestic violence was instead reduced to meme fodder and crude jokes.

The reaction has been as swift as it has been disturbing: mockery, laughter, judgment, and the ever familiar chorus of

“That’s what he gets for marrying his teacher.”And just like that, a moment that should have highlighted a very real issue, domestic violence against men, was drowned in ridicule. No hashtags. No public outcry.

No feminist organizations stepping forward. No nonprofit issuing a statement. Just silence. Deafening silence.Abuse is abuse, regardless of the gender of the perpetrator or the victim.

If the roles were reversed, if President Macron had slapped or pushed Brigitte Macron, there would be protests.

There would be hashtags. There would be fire and fury from advocacy groups.

The world would come to a standstill demanding accountability and protection for women, and rightly so.

But when it is a man, a world leader no less, experiencing what can only be described as a moment of public humiliation and physical aggression, the same voices fall silent.

Why? Because society has normalized the idea that men are too strong to be victims.

That their pain is comical. That their abuse is somehow deserved. And so, they suffer not just in silence but in isolation and shame.

President Macron has long been the subject of public scrutiny because of his marriage.

This age gap, had the roles been reversed, would be celebrated as empowerment or love defying the odds. But for him, it is used as a weapon to justify abuse.

And now, when a moment of violence occurs, it is brushed off with a laugh, as if his choices have made him unworthy of dignity or protection.

This is the very heart of the crisis.

Men continue to die in silence because the world refuses to see them as victims. They are mocked when they cry out. They are told to “man up” when they break down.

They are dismissed when they seek help. This stigma is not only cruel; it is deadly. Because behind the jokes are real men, fathers, brothers, sons, husbands, who endure violence every day with no one to fight for them, no one to believe them, and no safe space to heal.

Domestic violence affects men in ways that are deeply traumatic but rarely acknowledged.

Male victims often experience depression, anxiety, post traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation.

They are less likely to report abuse due to fear of not being believed or being seen as weak.

Many have nowhere to go. There are far fewer shelters for men, far fewer support systems, and almost no targeted campaigns offering help.

Men are suffering, and they are doing so alone.We need more men’s initiatives, more safe houses, more trained professionals who understand the psychological and emotional toll of abuse on men.

We need funding for shelters that serve male survivors, just as we fund shelters for women. These are not competing needs.

They are shared needs. Human needs.Mainstream media must rise above the culture of mockery and begin to treat violence against men as the serious issue it is.

This is not a laughing matter. When men are assaulted, their experiences should not become viral punchlines.

They should become urgent stories, stories that call us to confront our biases and open our eyes to the full scope of domestic abuse.

Governments also have a role to play. Policy must reflect the reality that domestic violence affects all genders.

This is not a laughing matter. When men are assaulted, their experiences should not become viral punchlines

Funding for prevention, shelters, legal aid, and trauma support should be inclusive.

It is unjust to pour millions into protecting women while completely overlooking the pain of men.

Protection should never be selective. Support should never be conditional.

If a government truly cares about the safety and mental health of its citizens, then male victims of abuse must be seen, heard, and supported with the same energy and investment.

President Macron’s case was domestic violence on full display, and it is not acceptable.

The world watched it happen. And the world laughed.

But one day, maybe not today, we must ask ourselves what kind of society we are building, one where men’s suffering is the punchline, or one where every victim matters.

It is time we stop treating abuse as a gendered issue and start treating it as a human one.

Because until we do, men will keep dying in silence, while the world keeps laughing.

Halima Layeni Men’s Mental Health Advocate Executive Director Life After Abuse Foundation

halimalayeni@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending