News
Tinubu erred by removing Fubara, dep – Lawyers
Senior Advocates of Nigeria, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa and Abeny Mohammed on Tuesday faulted the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State.
The SANs described the declaration of emergency state as well as the removal of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, as unconstitutional and undemocratic.
Following the political crisis in Rivers State, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu yesterday declared a state of emergency in the oil-rich state and suspended Fubara, Odu and members of the state House of Assembly for a period of six months.
In a nationwide broadcast, the president nominated Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (rtd) as administrator to take charge of the affairs of the state.
Rivers State has been embroiled in a crisis since last year when the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike and the governor fell out with each other.
The situation led to the alleged defection of 27 members of the state assembly loyal to Wike. The lawmakers subsequently lost their seats but were later reinstated by the Supreme Court.
Before declaring the state of emergency, Tinubu had, earlier yesterday, met with Senate President Godswill Akpabio and House of Representatives Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas as well as National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu, service chiefs and heads of other security agencies at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
But a ranking senator said yesterday that the president meeting the leadership of the national assembly was not enough as there was the need for the input of other members
“Why the rush? Why putting a retired soldier to take over? It is wrong to encourage military incursion in politics in whatever guise.
What the president did amounts to error of judgement and it will escalate tension in the Niger Delta. It is illegal,” he said.
Lawyers speak
Adegboruwa (SAN) called on the president to rescind his decision to remove the elected government officials in Rivers State and allow democratic process to be applied in dealing with issues.
“The action of Mr President is premeditated and showed that he is biased,” Adegboruwa alleged.
“I don’t support the actions of the governor or the FCT minister, but the declaration has upended the democratic will of the people of Rivers State.“ The action of the president is unwarranted, undemocratic and uncalled for.”
Adegboruwa also questioned why Osun and Benue states, with issues of local government dispute and Lagos State where two speakers of the state assembly emerged in one day had not been met with a state of emergency.
Similarly, Abeny Mohammed said the action taken by the president was extreme and unconstitutional.
He stated: “The Rivers State governor was elected into office by the people in accordance with the constitution and can only be removed in accordance with the constitution.”
However, Dayo Akinlaja (SAN), said the matter was beyond legal analysis as the crisis in Rivers State was an “upshot of a political crisis.”
It’s political manipulation – Atiku
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar yesterday described the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State as political manipulation.
He accused the president of being a partisan actor in the crisis, saying “Anyone paying attention to the unfolding crisis knows that Bola Tinubu has been a vested partisan actor in the political turmoil engulfing Rivers.
“His blatant refusal — or calculated negligence — in preventing this escalation is nothing short of disgraceful,” Atiku said.
The presidential candidate of the PDP in the last election in a post on his verified Facebook page said, “Beyond the political scheming in Rivers, the brazen security breaches that led to the condemnable destruction of national infrastructure in the state land squarely on the president’s desk.
“Tinubu cannot evade responsibility for the chaos his administration has either enabled or failed to prevent.
“It is an unforgivable failure that under Tinubu’s watch, the Niger Delta has been thrown back into an era of violent unrest and instability — undoing the hard-won peace secured by the late President Umaru Yar’adua.
Years of progress have been recklessly erased in pursuit of selfish political calculations.
“If federal infrastructure in Rivers has been compromised, the president bears full responsibility.
Punishing the people of Rivers State just to serve the political gamesmanship between the governor and Tinubu’s enablers in the federal government is nothing less than an assault on democracy and must be condemned in the strongest terms.”
Why I declared state of emergency in Rivers – Tinubu
In his broadcast, the president said he was disturbed at the turn of events in the political crisis in the state.
He said, “With the crisis persisting, there is no way democratic governance, which we have all fought and worked for over the years can thrive in a way that will benefit the good people of the state.
“The state has been at a standstill since the crisis started with the good people of the state not being able to have access to the dividends of democracy.
”The president added, “Some militants had threatened fire and brimstone against their perceived enemy of the governor who has up till now not disowned them.
“Apart from that both the House and the governor have not been able to work together.
Both of them do not realise that they are in office to work together for the peace and good governance of the state.
“Latest security reports made available to me show that between yesterday and today there have been disturbing incidents of vandalisation of pipelines by some militants without the governor taking any action to curtail them.
I have, of course given stern order to the security agencies to ensure safety of lives of the good people of Rivers State and the oil pipelines.”
The president said based on the situation, he was invoking the provisions of Section 305(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) “to declare a state of emergency on the state and that it takes effect from Tuesday, March 18, 2025.
“By this declaration, the Governor of Rivers State, Mr Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Mrs Ngozi Odu and all elected members of the House of Assembly of Rivers State are hereby suspended for an initial period of six months,” he said.
News
JUST IN: A’Court Stalls SERAP, Oluwadare Defamation Appeals Over Late Briefs
The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Friday stalled the hearing of two appeals filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, against a ₦101 million judgment debt.
The appeals challenge the May 5 judgment of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which held that SERAP and Oluwadare defamed two Department of State Services (DSS) officials through a false publication on September 10, 2024.
A three-member panel led by Justice Danlami Senchi first took the SERAP appeal marked CA/ABJ/CV/1114/2026. When the related appeal by Oluwadare (CA/ABJ/CV/1105/2026) was called, counsel Hannah Ayanwale informed the court that it was not ripe for hearing. She said the appellant’s brief was only filed on Thursday and served on the respondents in court on Friday morning, just before sitting began.
The justices expressed displeasure that the court had not been informed earlier that the sister appeal was not ready. Because both appeals arose from the same judgment, the panel set aside the proceedings already conducted on the SERAP appeal and ordered that the two matters be heard together.
The court adjourned both appeals to October 13. It directed the respondents to file their briefs by October 12 and the appellants to file any reply briefs before the next sitting.
In the May 5 judgment, Justice Halilu Yusuf of the FCT High Court found that SERAP and Oluwadare made false claims on the organisation’s website and social media platforms alleging that DSS officials Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024, and subjected staff to harassment.
The judge held that the claimants established all the ingredients of defamation. He rejected the defence of justification, noting that the defendants admitted at trial that the DSS officials did not forcibly enter the premises or brandish weapons. Words such as “invasion,” “forceful entry” and “harassment” were therefore used inaccurately.
Justice Yusuf ruled that the publications injured the claimants’ professional reputation and standing. He awarded ₦100 million in damages and ₦1 million as costs, ordered a public apology to be published on SERAP’s website, its X handle, two national newspapers and two television stations, and directed that the judgment sum attract 10 per cent interest per annum until fully paid.
News
JUST IN: Omi Eko Project Debunks Claims of Zero Progress
The Omi Eko Project Management has dismissed as misleading a circulating online report claiming that no physical infrastructure has been delivered seven months after the project’s kick-off.
In a statement signed by Dr. Segun Alabi, Head of Communications and Media, the management said the narrative fails to recognise the established processes required for a project of this scale and complexity.
The Omi Eko Project is being implemented in line with global best practices for major infrastructure development. These involve a structured progression through planning and procurement, design, infrastructure development, implementation, and evaluation phases. Such preparatory stages are essential to ensure the project is technically sound, financially responsible, environmentally sustainable, and capable of delivering its intended benefits.
“The absence of visible physical structures at an early stage should therefore not be misconstrued as an absence of progress,” the statement noted. Infrastructure projects of this magnitude require extensive technical assessments, detailed engineering designs, procurement processes, stakeholder engagement, and other essential groundwork before major construction activities begin.
The Omi Eko Project is a transformative initiative aimed at modernising Lagos State’s waterways transportation system. It is being pursued with a long-term vision of delivering a safer, more efficient, and environmentally sustainable transport network for residents.
Project management urged the public and media practitioners to verify information through official channels rather than circulating narratives that could misrepresent the implementation process. It reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, accountability, and the successful delivery of the project for the benefit of Lagosians.
News
South African Human Rights Lawyer, Navi Pillay, Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize •”It must be a joke,”she reacts
The Nobel Prizes come with a financial award, which this year is 12 million Swedish kronor per prize, or about $1.2 million.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced on Friday the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize winner is Navi Pillay, a South African human rights lawyer.
Pillay is recognised for her “efforts to promote peace and international law”, the Norwegian Nobel Committee says.
After being told she has won, Pillay jokes that she doesn’t quite believe the news is real, going on to have a jibe at the US president: “If you clap a little bit more I may share this prize with Trump”
Ms. Pillay, formerly the United Nations’ top human rights official, also served as a judge at the International Criminal Court and on an international tribunal investigating the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
Last year, a United Nations commission led by Ms. Pillay determined that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, a finding that the Israeli government rejected.
“This year’s laureate has been instrumental in ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are prosecuted,” the Nobel committee said in a statement.
The prize is awarded annually to a person or organization that has advanced “fraternity between nations,” worked toward disarmament or promoted peace conferences, according to the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, the creator of the prize.
Over time the criteria for selection have expanded to include other areas, including championing human rights and environmental protections.
The Nobel Prizes come with a financial award, which this year is 12 million Swedish kronor per prize, or about $1.2 million.
Last year, the Nobel Peace Prize went to María Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader, for her efforts to advance democracy “in the face of ever-expanding authoritarianism” in the country, according to the Nobel committee.
In January, Ms. Machado presented her medal to President Trump after U.S. troops captured Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s president.
The Norwegian Nobel Institute said the award itself cannot be transferred.
-
News3 days agoTears, Embraces as Rescued NYSC Members Reunite with Families in Ibadan
-
Business3 days agoNaira Exchange Rates Friday, October 9
-
Business3 days agoManufacturers sitting on N40trn untapped opportunities, says report
-
News3 days agoAhmadu Bello University Hikes Fees Across Programme
-
Politics3 days ago2027: INEC Displays Voter Register, Begins PVC Distribution Today
-
News2 days agoJUST IN: Omi Eko Project Debunks Claims of Zero Progress
-
Sports3 days agoNational Sports Commission Changes Secretaries
-
Health3 days agoMillions of bedbugs crawl out of mattresses and walls in huge outbreak
