The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has accused the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led administration under President Bola Tinubu of normalising unacceptable practices in governance, citing a series of recent events that it says undermine institutional integrity, national security, and Nigeria’s international standing.

In a strongly worded press statement issued on Thursday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Comrade Ini Ememobong, the PDP highlighted what it described as an “unending series of absurdities” in recent weeks.

The opposition party called for a comprehensive investigation into alleged discrepancies between the tax reform laws passed by the National Assembly and the versions subsequently gazetted by the government.

The issue was first raised by Hon. Abdussamad Dasuki, a PDP member of the House of Representatives, who flagged inconsistencies during a plenary session on December 17.

“This disparity must be comprehensively investigated and not treated with the customary levity that this administration has shown toward very serious issues of governance,” the statement read.

“Nigerians are interested in knowing how the insertions and substitutions got into the gazetted copy.

“The PDP commended Hon. Dasuki for his vigilance and demanded a six-month postponement of the Tax Act’s commencement date, originally set for January 1, 2026, to allow time for a thorough probe, publication of the correct enacted version, and public enlightenment campaigns.

The party also criticised the administration over Nigeria’s declining global influence, pointing to the recent detention of a Nigerian Air Force C-130 aircraft and 11 personnel in Burkina Faso following an emergency landing on December 8.

The crew was released after diplomatic interventions led by Foreign Affairs Minister Yusuf Tuggar.

Additionally, the PDP referenced new U.S. visa restrictions announced by the White House on December 16, which impose partial limitations on Nigerian nationals for certain immigrant and non-immigrant categories, citing security concerns and visa overstay rates.

“This is a sad commentary on the current leadership of our country, who have paid more attention to politics than governance,” the statement said, noting Nigeria’s drop in military rankings and politicisation of security issues.

The PDP further questioned President Tinubu’s absence from the 68th Ordinary Session of the ECOWAS Heads of State and Government, hosted in Abuja on December 14, where he was represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima.

The summit addressed regional insecurity and political instability.While acknowledging the President’s right to delegate, the party argued that his attendance at a subsequent political event signalled a deprioritisation of regional stability.

In its conclusion, the PDP urged the government to focus on governance rather than 2027 election preparations, calling for increased investments in security, education, infrastructure, and healthcare.

“The stakes are too high for business as usual. Our legislative integrity, international standing, and regional leadership are not partisan issues; they are national imperatives.

Nigerians deserve solutions, not excuses,” the statement emphasised.

• Senate screening of ambassadors nominees presided by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio.

The Senate on Tuesday approved the nomination of three ambassadorial nominees—Ayodele Oke, Colonel Kayode Are (rtd), and Amin Dalhatu for appointment as envoys.

The resolution of the Senate followed its consideration of the report of the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs presented by its chairman, Senator Abubakar Sani Bello, during plenary.

Oke is a former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and ex-Nigerian Ambassador to the Commonwealth Secretariat in London.

Are is a former Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS).

Dalhatu is Nigeria’s immediate past Ambassador to South Korea.

The trio were unanimously endorsed by lawmakers when the Senate President Godswill Akpabio put their nomination to a voice vote during today’s plenary.

In his comment, Akpabio urged the ambassadors-designate to bring to bear their wealth of experience in their new roles.

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has reacted to the apex court’s judgement today which upheld that the President has the constitutional power to impose a state of emergency, in this case Rivers State.

PDP, in its reaction, describe the judgement as “a dangerous democratic bend,” saying , “While we respect the authority of the apex court and recognise its finality within our jurisdiction, we are nevertheless compelled to draw attention to the grave dangers that can emanate from the interpretation of the reasoning in this judgement on the political landscape of our country.”

In a statement signed by Comrade Ini Ememobong, National Publicity Secretary of the party, noted :

” Earlier today, a full panel of the Supreme Court finally delivered a split judgment (six to one) in the suit filed by the Attorney-General of Adamawa State and others against the Attorney-General of the Federation and the National Assembly.

The suit marked SC/CV/329/2025, challenged the powers of the President to suspend democratically elected officials like the Governor and Deputy Governor, and democratic institutions such as the Rivers State House of Assembly.

The Apex Court struck out the suit based on an absence of a cause of action but, went on to comment on the issues raised in the suit therein.

Their comments have been largely interpreted as upholding President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State earlier this year.

Our concern is anchored on the age-long principle of law that the express mention of one thing excludes others (expressio unius est exclusio alterius), and the clear constitutional position that no person or institution(other than the State House of Assembly or a court of law), is empowered to remove a Governor from office, even temporarily, during the subsistence of a constitutional term.

To hold otherwise is to create a pathway by which a President, with the active support of the National Assembly, can compel political alignment or compliance through the instrumentality of emergency powers in ways not envisaged by the Constitution.

We submit that the interpretation of this judgment has the potential to reverse the hard-won democratic gains by unwittingly making state governments completely subservient to the Federal Government, forcing them to seek to ‘connect to the centre’ by joining the ruling party, as we are already witnessing.

More troubling is the fact that the logical extension of this reasoning based on the provision of Section 305(3)(c) “extraordinary measures to restore peace and security” could, in the future, be interpreted to justify the suspension of other constitutional institutions, including the judiciary itself.

We cannot reconcile how in a federation (not a unitary state) an elected President can be empowered to dismantle the democratic structures of a federating unit, sack elected officials and appoint leaders there, without consciously promoting authoritarianism and entrenching tyranny.

As a political party wholly committed to the protection and consolidation of democracy in Nigeria, we hereby call on the National Assembly to urgently initiate constitutional and legislative safeguards that clearly define and limit the scope of emergency powers of the president, to prevent imminent abuse and preserve Nigeria’s federation.

We also urge Nigerians, civil society organisations, the media, and the international democratic community to remain vigilant in the defence of constitutionalism, federalism, and the sanctity of the electoral mandate.

We remain hopeful that, at the next opportunity, the Supreme Court will have cause to extensively clarify the constitutional boundaries of emergency powers, in the overriding interest of justice, democracy, and the long-term stability of our Republic.”