Connect with us

Politics

Busari-Akinnadeju Confirms DLA Refund of N10.8m Presidential Nomination Fee

” I thank the Nigerians who stood with me through the past week, who read, who watched, who shared, who wrote, and who made it impossible for this story to be treated as private.”

Published

on

143 Views


Abisayo Busari-Akinnadeju has confirmed that the Democratic
Leadership Alliance (DLA) has refunded the Presidential nomination fee she paid to the Party in April 2026, in respect of her aspiration for the Office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the 2027 general election.
The refund was received by bank transfer on 3rd of June 2026.

Mrs. Busari-Akinnadeju resigned from the DLA on 28 May 2026, citing, among other matters, the imposition of a
consensus candidate by means that did not comply with the Electoral Act 2026 and the use of a disciplinary process to remove her as a cleared aspirant when she would not endorse that
consensus.
In response to the refund, Mrs. Busari-Akinnadeju issued the following statement.
“I acknowledge receipt of NGN 10,800,000 of the Presidential nomination fee I paid in April 2026, and I note that a further NGN 1,200,000, also paid in April, remains outstanding.

I am grateful that the Party has chosen to do the right thing in this respect.”
“It is important, however, that the meaning of this refund is not misunderstood.
The return of the money does not return the integrity of the process. It is an
acknowledgement that the original collection was indefensible. It is not a remedy for what was done in the weeks between the collection and the return.”
“The systemic questions raised by my experience remain open. An intentional
attempt to debar me from being screened, a disciplinary action to complete the process after screening, the State Chairmen of the Party were directed not to attend the Presidential primary at the Headquarter, but to transmit figures to the National Secretariat so that a candidate could be produced by a purported
consensus.

The Electoral Act 2026 does not permit this without the written
consent of every cleared aspirant.

My removal, through a disciplinary process convened on three days notice and conducted without particulars, was the route by which that statutory obstacle was cleared.

Those facts are not undone by a bank transfer.”
“My concern is no longer about my own money. It is about the next aspirant, in
this Party or any other, whose money may not come back so quickly because
she does not have the standing or the platform to demand it.

The right to a fair
contest is not a privilege of the well-resourced. It is a constitutional entitlement of every Nigerian who participates in the political process, and it must be enforceable by every one of them.

“I thank the Nigerians who stood with me through the past week, who read, who watched, who shared, who wrote, and who made it impossible for this story to be treated as private.

The strength of public attention is what made this refund possible.

The same strength will be needed for the larger work.

“The Office of the Nigerian Citizen is open. The Dare Agenda is in motion. The country cannot wait until 2027, and I will not be waiting until then to do the work I am here to do.”

Mrs. Busari-Akinnadeju confirmed that she remains in non-partisan public life and that the citizens’ platform she announced on 29 May 2026, the Office of the Nigerian Citizen, continues its work under the Dare Agenda framework.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

INEC to test- run election technology for 2027 polls

The INEC chairman said that the initiatives were part of broader efforts to improve technological reliability, including the continued deployment of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), as well as an ongoing review of the Commission’s cybersecurity architecture covering system redundancy.

Published

on

By

58 Views

INEC Chairman, Prof Joash Amupitan has said that the Commission was considering a full audit of its electoral systems and a mock presidential election to test the readiness of its processes and technology ahead of the 2027 polls.

Amupitan disclosed this on Thursday while receiving the British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Dr Richard Montgomery, during a courtesy visit to the Commission’s headquarters in Abuja.

Amupitan said that the proposals, which were under consideration by the Commission, were informed by concerns arising from the 2023 general election, particularly over the reliability of election technology.

According to him, although the proposed exercises were not included in INEC’s budget, the Commission would explore ways to implement them because of their potential to enhance the credibility of the elections.

The INEC chairman said that the initiatives were part of broader efforts to improve technological reliability, including the continued deployment of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), as well as an ongoing review of the Commission’s cybersecurity architecture covering system redundancy.

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court restores INEC’s timetable for 2027 elections

The three Justices unanimously agreed that Justice Mohammed Garba Umar of the Federal High Court, who on May 20 nullified the guidelines on the ground that they violated some provisions of the Electoral Act, did so in gross error and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.‎‎

Published

on

By

58 Views

‎‎The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Thursday validated the guidelines issued by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the conduct of the 2027 general elections.

‎‎In a unanimous judgment delivered by the justices , the appellate court voided and set aside the May 20 judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had nullified the guidelines and barred their implementation.

‎‎In the lead judgment, prepared by Justice Adebukola Banjoko and read by Justice Okon Abang, the Court of Appeal held that the Youth Party (YP), which instituted the case against INEC, lacked the legal standing (locus standi) to do so.‎‎

Justice Banjoko stated that the party did not explain how the guidelines affected it and its members in the conduct of its primary elections for the nomination of candidates for the 2027 polls.‎‎

The Court also held that the YP failed to establish how the guidelines affected the submission of its nominated candidates to INEC.‎‎

The three Justices unanimously agreed that Justice Mohammed Garba Umar of the Federal High Court, who on May 20 nullified the guidelines on the ground that they violated some provisions of the Electoral Act, did so in gross error and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.‎‎

INEC, which filed the appeal against the High Court decision, had argued that the lower court erred in law when it failed to pronounce on the jurisdictional issue of the suit being hypothetical and academic, and a denial of fair hearing to the appellant.

‎‎INEC, through its lead counsel, Alex Izinyon SAN, had asked the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court which nullified part of the election guidelines put in place by the agency for the conduct of the 2027 general elections.‎‎

The lawyer said the lower court erred in law when it held:

“It is clear from the wording of Sections 29(1), 82, and 84 of the Electoral Act, 2026, the following can be understood. Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026 mandates political parties to submit the names of candidates first in the prescribed forms of the candidates who emerged from its valid primaries, which such political party intends to sponsor at the elections, not later than 120 days before the date of the General election.‎‎

“What is required of political parties to do under the Electoral Act, 2026 is to notify the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) 21 days before the holding of its primaries, congresses, or conventions, conference, or meeting convened for the election of its executive committees, other governing bodies, or nominating candidates.‎‎

“The defendant is not mandated to impose a timeframe for political parties to conduct their primaries, provided that it will be done and submitted not later than the 120 days provided by the Electoral Act, 2026. See Section 82(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026.”

Continue Reading

Politics

ADC cheerful over successful upload on INEC portal

Hon Nafiu Bala Gombe, National Chairman, ADC confirmed the development on Monday .

Published

on

By

102 Views

The African Democratic Congress, ADC, has successfully completed the upload of its Presidential, Vice-Presidential, and National Assembly candidates on the INEC portal for the 2027 General Elections.

Hon Nafiu Bala Gombe, National Chairman, ADC confirmed the development on Monday .

“This achievement demonstrates our Party’s firm commitment to safeguarding the interests of our founding and legacy members in the face of anti-democratic tendencies.

As a Party, the ADC remains resolute in its mission to field credible, competent, and people-centered candidates who will provide purposeful leadership, promote good governance, and bring hope to the Nigerian people.”

Continue Reading

Trending