Business
BREAKING:Globacom CEO Ahmad Farroukh Resigns Amid Governance Challenges
Globacom’s leadership void following Farroukh’s departure will raise questions about the company’s ability to navigate its ongoing internal challenges and regain its competitive edge.
Ahmad Farroukh, the CEO of Nigerian telecom giant Globacom, has resigned after just one month in the role, multiple sources close to the matter confirmed.
While Globacom has not issued an official statement or communicated the resignation internally, several industry insiders suggest the decision was linked to significant challenges within the company’s organizational structure.
Techcabal reports that Farroukh’s departure was tied to problems with the organizational setup. A top-level executive at the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) who asked not to be named confirmed Farroukh’s exit but declined to share specifics.
Farroukh’s abrupt resignation highlights significant internal challenges at the company, which has long been criticized for its centralized decision-making process.
According to a former Globacom executive, the company’s founder, Mike Adenuga, is key to most decisions within the company.
Adenuga has managed the telecom giant alongside his other business interests, including oil and gas, financial services, and real estate, with minimal structural separation between his other ventures and Globacom’s operations.
This approach has historically worked for the company but may have presented obstacles for Farroukh, whose experience at more structured organizations like MTN and Airtel might have led him to expect a different level of operational autonomy.
Farroukh’s departure also comes when Globacom is facing heightened regulatory scrutiny.
In late 2024, the NCC’s sector audit revealed that over 40 million subscribers were not properly registered with their National Identification Numbers (NIN), violating government regulations.
This led to a significant loss of market share, with Globacom’s share of the Nigerian mobile market shrinking by approximately 60%, leaving it with just 12%.
Globacom has also faced ongoing cybersecurity issues, including a high-profile hack in 2023 that exposed the personal data of millions of its subscribers.
These issues may have created an environment where Farroukh’s leadership efforts could not make a meaningful impact quickly.
“A CEO leaving in one month is unprecedented in the industry. The NCC can investigate the reason for his exit. The commission can seek an explanation from the CEO, who is not obligated to respond, or from the company because this is about corporate governance, which the NCC Act covers,” said Ayoola Oke, a former Adviser to the former Executive Vice-Chairman of NCC, Ernest Ndukwe.
Globacom’s leadership void following Farroukh’s departure will raise questions about the company’s ability to navigate its ongoing internal challenges and regain its competitive edge.
Without significant structural changes, it is unclear how Globacom can address the organizational weaknesses that led to Farroukh’s exit.
Business
The companies making billions from the Iran war – BBC
Here are some of the sectors and companies making billions while the Middle East conflict continues.
As households across the globe count the costs of the US-Israel war in Iran, some companies have been counting bumper profits instead.
The uncertainty sparked by the conflict, and Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, is driving up the cost of living and hitting the budgets of firms, families and governments.
But while some have been pushed to the brink, others, whose core businesses are more profitable in a war or who benefit from volatile energy prices, have seen record earnings.
Here are some of the sectors and companies making billions while the Middle East conflict continues.
1. Oil and gas
The biggest economic impact of the war so far has been a surge in energy prices. Around a fifth of the world’s oil and gas is transported through the Strait of Hormuz, but those shipments effectively ground to a halt at the end of February.
The result has been a rollercoaster of price movements on energy markets, with some of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies benefiting.
The main beneficiaries have been European oil giants, who have trading arms so have been able to gain from sharp price movements boosting profits.
BP’s profits more than doubled to $3.2bn (£2.4bn) for the first three months of the year, after what it called an “exceptional” performance in its trading division.
Shell also beat analysts’ expectations when it reported a rise in first-quarter profits to $6.92bn.
Another international giant, TotalEnergies, saw its profits jump by almost a third, to $5.4bn in the first quarter of 2026, driven by volatility in oil and energy markets.
US giants ExxonMobil and Chevron saw their earnings fall compared with the same period last year, due to supply disruption from the Middle East, but both beat analysts’ forecasts and expect their profits to grow further as the year goes on, with the price of oil still significantly higher than when the war broke out.
2. Big banks
Some of the biggest banks have also seen their profits boosted during the war in Iran.
JP Morgan’s trading arm made a record $11.6bn of revenue in the first three months of 2026, helping the bank overall to its second biggest ever quarterly profit.
Across the rest of the “Big Six” banks – which includes Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo, as well as JP Morgan – profits all rose substantially in the first quarter of the year.
Overall, the banks reported $47.7bn in profits for the first three months of 2026.
“Heavy trading volumes have benefited investment banks, in particular Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs,” Susannah Streeter, chief investment strategist at Wealth Club, said.
The major Wall Street lenders have been boosted by a surge in demand for trading, with investors rushing to drop riskier stocks and bonds and pile their cash into assets that are seen as safer. Trading volumes have also been lifted by investors seeking to capitalise on the volatility in financial markets.
3. Defence
One of the most immediate beneficiaries in any conflict is the defence sector, according to Emily Sawicz, senior analyst at RSM UK.
“The conflict has reinforced gaps in air defence capability, accelerating investment in missile defence, counter drone systems and military hardware across Europe and the US,” she told the BBC.
As well as highlighting the importance of defence firms, the war creates a need for governments to replenish weapons stocks, boosting demand.
BAE Systems, which makes products including F35 fighter jet components, said in a trading update on Thursday it expects strong growth in sales and profits this year.
It cited growing “security threats” around the world pushing up government defence spending, which has in turn created a “supportive backdrop” for the company.
4. Renewables
The conflict has also highlighted the need to diversify away from reliance on fossil fuels, Streeter said.
This has “supercharged interest in the renewable sector” even in the US, she said, where the Trump administration has popularised the “drill, baby, drill” slogan encouraging greater fossil fuel usage.
Streeter said the war has led to renewable investment being seen as increasingly important to stability and resilience to shocks.One firm that has been boosted is Florida-based NextEra Energy, which has seen shares surge by 17% so far this year as investors pile in on its mission.
Danish wind power giants Vestas and Orsted have also reported surging profits, highlighting how the fallout from the Iran war is also boosting renewable energy firms.
In the UK, Octopus Energy recently told the BBC the war had caused a “huge jolt” in solar panel and heat pump sales, with solar panel sales rising by 50% since the end of February.
The surge in petrol prices has also boosted demand for electric vehicles, with Chinese manufacturers in particular making the most of the opportunity.
Business
For stable electricity, should Nigeria invite China to manage Power Sector for 20 years ?
Goje was reacting to the new Minister of Power, Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe ‘s comment that he cannot promise Nigerians uninterrupted electricity immediately but pledged to deliver noticeable improvements in the sector within a short period.
Image: collage of power grid/ Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe
Senator Muhammed Danjuma Goje thinks so.
Goje was a former minister of state for power and steel between 1999-2001; former governor of Gombe State 2003-2011, and now a senator representing Gombe Central.
He emphasised the need this week during the screening of minister -designates at the National Assembly.
Goje told fellow lawmakers that the federal government had better handover Nigeria’s power sector to China or another advanced country for 20 years to achieve stable electricity.
Goje was reacting to the new Minister of Power, Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe ‘s comment that he cannot promise Nigerians uninterrupted electricity immediately but pledged to deliver noticeable improvements in the sector within a short period.
Addressing lawmakers, the minister-designate said he would rather focus on realistic and measurable progress than make promises he cannot keep.
“If I am confirmed, the Senate President, Distinguished Senators, I will not stand here and say tomorrow I will give you 24-hour electricity.
” But what I will tell you about the very honest approach, I will ensure that visible improvement is seen across the country in the shortest time possible. I will commit that we will replace uncertainties for Nigerians with clarity”,Tegbe said.
Tegbe identified distribution challenges as one of the major issues affecting the power sector, noting that inefficiencies remain across the electricity value chain.
Business
Nigeria missing among top four African economies sustaining industrialisation – Report
The RED Index identifies that Morocco, Egypt, South Africa and Mauritius emerge as the only economies with the alignment required to sustain industrial growth.
Image credit : BCAfrica.
The Business Council for Africa (BCA) has released its 2025 RED Index of Industrial Development in Africa.
In the report, only four African economies are structurally positioned to sustain high-growth industrialisation.
The RED Index identifies that Morocco, Egypt, South Africa and Mauritius emerge as the only economies with the alignment required to sustain industrial growth, while Rwanda and Nigeria show meaningful progress but remain incomplete in their trajectory.
The report further indicated that the majority of African economies are classified as either vulnerable or stalled.
The Index evaluates each economy across three decisive dimensions: Engines of Industrialisation, representing foundational capabilities; Accelerators, determining the pace of transformation; and Decelerators, the structural constraints that can stall or reverse progress.
Commenting on the report, Chairman of the Business Council for Africa, Arnold Ekpe said:“This is not just an index. It is a call to action for African policymakers, investors, and businesses to take ownership of Africa’s industrial future and commit to the structural changes required to deliver sustained growth.
”As global capital seeks scalable and resilient growth opportunities, the RED Index provides a lens for identifying where industrialisation is viable, where structural risks remain elevated and where targeted intervention can unlock long-term.”
-
Sports3 days agoNFF appoints new Golden Eaglets, Flying Eagles coaches
-
News3 days agoNECO Expands Global Reach as FG Moves to Computer-Based Exams by 2027.
-
Business3 days agoNigeria missing among top four African economies sustaining industrialisation – Report
-
Entertainment3 days agoDavido to be inducted into Black Music Walk of Fame
-
Politics3 days agoJUST IN: Federal High Court adjourns ADC leadership suit indefinitely
-
Sports3 days agoGermany defender Sule to retire this summer aged 30
-
Politics3 days agoJonathan challenges suit seeking his disqualification from 2027 race
-
Business3 days agoFor stable electricity, should Nigeria invite China to manage Power Sector for 20 years ?
