Connect with us

Politics

Timi Frank says Trump’s letter not political ‘endorsement’ of Tinubu

He questioned the authenticity of the document being celebrated by the Federal Government, maintaining that even if the letter exists, it should not be interpreted as political support for Tinubu or his administration.

Published

on

3 Views

• Collage of President Trump, and President Tinubu

Former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Timi Frank, has expressed doubts about the letter United States, President Donald Trump, reportedly sent as an endorsement of President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

Frank, who described the letter as a routine diplomatic correspondence acknowledging security cooperation between Nigeria and the United States, dared the Presidency to publish the letter, insisting that any genuine communication from the American President should bear the official White House seal and President Trump’s signature.

“The letter is not from the White House. If it doesn’t have the White House seal and the signature of the President of the United States, it appears dubious at best,” Frank said in a statement.

He questioned the authenticity of the document being celebrated by the Federal Government, maintaining that even if the letter exists, it should not be interpreted as political support for Tinubu or his administration.

“The letter only commended Nigeria for partnering with the United States in addressing insecurity. That is the only reason President Trump may have written it.

It was not an endorsement of President Tinubu’s leadership, his economic policies or his administration. It did not say the Trump administration is backing President Tinubu or supporting him for any election in Nigeria.

The Presidency is only trying to change the narrative by presenting it as something more than it is,” he said.

Credit: Daily Trust

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Fashola declares, “I’m not interested in becoming President of Nigeria”

Fashola, made the declaration during an appearance on TVC News, on Wednesday.

Published

on

By

7 Views

The former Lagos State Governor and former Minister of Works, Babatunde Fashola, has ruled out contesting for presidency.

Fashola, made the declaration during an appearance on TVC News, on Wednesday.

Fielding question on if he would contest for president of Nigeria, he replied, “No” emphasising that he is content with his current role at home and would rather allow history to judge his public service.

Reflecting on his more than two decades in public service, the former minister described his journey as an extraordinary privilege.

“My journey has been an unimaginable privilege, and I hope that it, in some way, inspires another generation about the possibilities of this country,” he said.

He noted that Nigeria also has countless stories of people rising from humble beginnings to positions of prominence.

Source: TVC

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC to test- run election technology for 2027 polls

The INEC chairman said that the initiatives were part of broader efforts to improve technological reliability, including the continued deployment of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), as well as an ongoing review of the Commission’s cybersecurity architecture covering system redundancy.

Published

on

By

74 Views

INEC Chairman, Prof Joash Amupitan has said that the Commission was considering a full audit of its electoral systems and a mock presidential election to test the readiness of its processes and technology ahead of the 2027 polls.

Amupitan disclosed this on Thursday while receiving the British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Dr Richard Montgomery, during a courtesy visit to the Commission’s headquarters in Abuja.

Amupitan said that the proposals, which were under consideration by the Commission, were informed by concerns arising from the 2023 general election, particularly over the reliability of election technology.

According to him, although the proposed exercises were not included in INEC’s budget, the Commission would explore ways to implement them because of their potential to enhance the credibility of the elections.

The INEC chairman said that the initiatives were part of broader efforts to improve technological reliability, including the continued deployment of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), as well as an ongoing review of the Commission’s cybersecurity architecture covering system redundancy.

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court restores INEC’s timetable for 2027 elections

The three Justices unanimously agreed that Justice Mohammed Garba Umar of the Federal High Court, who on May 20 nullified the guidelines on the ground that they violated some provisions of the Electoral Act, did so in gross error and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.‎‎

Published

on

By

74 Views

‎‎The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Thursday validated the guidelines issued by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the conduct of the 2027 general elections.

‎‎In a unanimous judgment delivered by the justices , the appellate court voided and set aside the May 20 judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had nullified the guidelines and barred their implementation.

‎‎In the lead judgment, prepared by Justice Adebukola Banjoko and read by Justice Okon Abang, the Court of Appeal held that the Youth Party (YP), which instituted the case against INEC, lacked the legal standing (locus standi) to do so.‎‎

Justice Banjoko stated that the party did not explain how the guidelines affected it and its members in the conduct of its primary elections for the nomination of candidates for the 2027 polls.‎‎

The Court also held that the YP failed to establish how the guidelines affected the submission of its nominated candidates to INEC.‎‎

The three Justices unanimously agreed that Justice Mohammed Garba Umar of the Federal High Court, who on May 20 nullified the guidelines on the ground that they violated some provisions of the Electoral Act, did so in gross error and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.‎‎

INEC, which filed the appeal against the High Court decision, had argued that the lower court erred in law when it failed to pronounce on the jurisdictional issue of the suit being hypothetical and academic, and a denial of fair hearing to the appellant.

‎‎INEC, through its lead counsel, Alex Izinyon SAN, had asked the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court which nullified part of the election guidelines put in place by the agency for the conduct of the 2027 general elections.‎‎

The lawyer said the lower court erred in law when it held:

“It is clear from the wording of Sections 29(1), 82, and 84 of the Electoral Act, 2026, the following can be understood. Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026 mandates political parties to submit the names of candidates first in the prescribed forms of the candidates who emerged from its valid primaries, which such political party intends to sponsor at the elections, not later than 120 days before the date of the General election.‎‎

“What is required of political parties to do under the Electoral Act, 2026 is to notify the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) 21 days before the holding of its primaries, congresses, or conventions, conference, or meeting convened for the election of its executive committees, other governing bodies, or nominating candidates.‎‎

“The defendant is not mandated to impose a timeframe for political parties to conduct their primaries, provided that it will be done and submitted not later than the 120 days provided by the Electoral Act, 2026. See Section 82(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026.”

Continue Reading

Trending